|
Showing posts with label petition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label petition. Show all posts

April 15, 2013

Press release by Citizens for Justice and Peace on the protest petition filed by Mrs Zakia Jafri (15 April 2013)

The text of the press release put out by the Trustees of the Citizens for Justice and Peace on the protest petition filed by Mrs Zakia Jafri

A cold-blooded and clear-cut conspiracy to manipulate the tragic Godhra incident -- from the moment of the terrible news  -- was planned and executed by Chief Minister Mr Narendra Modi (Accused no 1), in close consultation, especially with then Health Minister Mr Ashok Bhatt (accused no. 2) , Urban development minister, IK Jadeja (accused no 3) and other co-accused cabinet colleagues and especially VHP leader Mr Jaydeep Patel (accused no 21), with whom the CM was first in touch with soon after the tragic Godhra incident. This was aimed at ensuring that the tragedy at Godhra becomes ready fuel for the meticulously planned massacre of innocent Muslims all over Gujarat.
Mrs Zakia Ahsan Jafri today filed her Protest Petition praying for the rejection in toto of the SIT final report dated 8.2.2012, making a cogent case for the charge-sheeting of all 59 accused listed in her complaint dated 8.6.2006, beginning with Mr. Modi the chief minister of Gujarat.
The protest petition that runs into 514 pages also has three volumes of annexures and ten CDs. The Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) with its entire legal team has assisted in this painstaking and voluminous exercise.
The Petitioner strongly argues that the Supreme Court appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) had adequate documents and statements to come to a prima facie finding against all the accused. SIT, however decided to cover up the crimes and has gone out of its way to misguide the Court and give a clean chit to the accused.
Phone call records show Mr Modi (accused no 1, A-1) to have been in close touch with Mr Jaideep Patel (A-21) immediately after information of the Godhra tragedy comes in, even before he meets home department officials and ministers. Thereafter, there is a hasty and publicly conducted post-mortem at Godhra, out in the public against all law and procedure while a crowd of VHP workers was present. Mr Modi is present while this happens.
Thereafter, while passions are being cynically stoked, another sinister decision to hand over the dead bodies of Godhra victims to VHP strongman Mr Jaideep Patel (A-21) is taken at a mini-cabinet meeting presided by Mr Modi in Godhra, at which co-accused ministers are physically present. Mr Jaideep Patel too is present at the meeting. Then Godhra district magistrate, Mrs Jayanti Ravi has clearly stated that Mr Jaideep Patel was present at the meeting.
The Protest Petition goes into great detail, relying on documents from the investigation papers, on how the administration and police were deliberately paralysed and neutralised by the conspiracy hatched by Mr Modi, Co-accused, then Gujarat DGP Mr K Chakravari (A-25), then police commissioner, Ahmedabad, PC Pande (A-29), then additional chief secretary, home, Mr Ashok Narayan (A-28) and other key members of the bureaucracy and police who connived as co conspirators in the conspiracy.
Key field reports from the SIB (state intelligence bureau) from all districts were given to the SIT by January 2010, i.e., full three and a half months before the SIT submitted its first investigation report to the Supreme Court on 12.5.2010. These reports reveal a grim ground level reality: gross provocations and bloodthirsty slogans by VHP workers from 4 p.m. onwards on the afternoon of 27.2.2002 (“Khoon ka badla khoon se lenge”, blood for blood) while Mr Modi had still not left for Godhra.
Phone records of the chief minister’s office (CMO) reveal that he went to the airport to catch a helicopter for Godhra via Meghaninagar where the massacre at Gulberg society the next day was organized. Phone records of the CMO also show that after landing in Ahmedabad from Vadodara by aircraft (where he had travelled by road from Godhra on his return journey) too, Mr Modi and officials of the CMO who accompanied him are located at Meghaninagar late evening (mobile phone call records).
Just a week before the Godhra incident, on  22.2.2002, Mr Modi had won in the Rajkot bye-election by a slender margin (a few thousand votes). The glory of his victory had been dimmed with minority votes going heavily against him. Former CPI leader and later Parliamentarian from the Congress, Ahsan Jafri had been an active campaigner against Mr Modi in the bye-election lived in Gulberg Society, in Meghaninagar.
In a sinister furtherance of the conspiracy, the late night meeting at Mr Modi’s residence effectively neutralised the police and administration from doing its constitutional duty. The Protest Petition states that the credibility of the evidence related to the critical 27.2.2002 meeting must be tested during trial and that it was not the job of the investigating agency to pre-judge the issue, acting like a court overstepping its jurisdiction to protect and save powerful accused.
Evidence from Police Control Room (PCR) records submitted by Mr. PC Pande to the SIT after 15.3.2011 reveal cynical and cold-blooded mobilization of RSS workers and VHP men at the Sola Civil hospital from 4 a.m. onwards on 28.2.2002 in aggressive anticipation for the arrival of the dead bodies. Repeated PCR messages, that the home department under Mr. Modi (A-1, who held the home portfolio) and Mr PC Pande (A-21) were trying to conceal, show that both in Ahmedabad and in several locations all over Gujarat crowds were mobilized to aggressively parade bodies with bloodthirsty sloganeering, inciting mobs to attack innocent Muslims.
The then joint police commissioner, Ahmedabad, Mr Shivanand Jha, also an accused in the complaint (A-38), was jurisdictionally in charge of Sola Civil Hospital in Zone 1. As the messages extracted below show, repeated PCR messages desperately ask for bandobast; they speak of the staff and doctors of the hospital being under threat; of a 5,000-6,000 strong mob accompanying the bodies and finally one message also says that “riots have broken out.”
Yet Mr Modi, the entire Home department and the accused under him and individuals accused including Mr Chakravarti (A-25) and Mr PC Pande (A-29) in collaboration with the SIT have strived hard to conceal this evidence. While such aggressive funeral processions were allowed in Ahmedabad, an equally explosive situation prevailed simultaneously in Khedbrahma, Vadodara, Modasa, Dahod, Anand etc. A cynical government under Mr Modi and his co-accused conspirators has done their level best to conceal this evidence.
The PCR records -- that the SIT was trying hard to conceal -- also reveal that while the Ahmedabad police under Mr PC Pande and the home department  under Mr Modi and then MOS, home Mr Gordhan Zadaphiya (A-5 ) had enough forces to escort a VHP leader known for his inciteful slogans, Acharya Giriraj Kishore, from the airport to the Sola Civil hospital to accompany the processionists, shouting filthy hate speeches and murderous slogans. But they did not have enough forces to send to Naroda Patiya where 96 persons were massacred in broad daylight (charge-sheet figures in the Naroda Patiya case, though more deaths have been recorded) and 69 persons at Gulberg society the same day and around the same time aggressive processions were being allowed. Mr Modi allowing and openly supporting the bandh and neutralising his administration, decided to give the RSS, VHP, BD mobs a free run of the Gujarat streets to massacre innocents.
As bad or worse were the provocations and hate speeches that were cynically allowed and encouraged by Mr. Modi and his administration. PCR messages of Ahmedabad and SIB messages from all over the state are testimony to this incendiary mobilisation.
Warnings Ignored (from SIB and PCR messages)
12:30 pm on the 27th February: An SIB officer through fax no 525 communicated to the headquarters that there were reports that some dead bodies would be brought to Kalupur Hospital station in Ahmedabad city. "So communal violence will occur in the city of Ahmedabad; so take preventive action."
Another SIB message numbered as Out/184/02 again warned about communal incidents if bodies were brought to Ahmedabad. "Communal violence will occur in the city. So take preventive action."  The same message said that karsevaks had given explosive interviews to a TV station at Godhra and had threatened to unleash violence against the Muslims.  
At 1:51 hours and again at 1:59 hours on the 28th February there were panic messages by wireless police vans positioned at Sola Hospital demanding immediate protection from Special Reserve Police platoons and the presence of DCP Zone 1.
Message at 2:44 hours on 28.2.2002: the motor cavalcade has reached Sola Civil Hospital.
Page No. 5790 of Annexure IV, File XIV reveals that at 04:00 am a mob comprising of 3,000 swayamsevaks, that is the members of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), had already gathered at the Civil Sola Hospital.
At 7.14 a.m. the PCR van again informs the Police Control Room that a large mob had assembled at the hospital. (Page 5796 of Annexure IV, File XIV of the documents).
Again, another message three minutes later at 7:17 a.m. (Page 5797 of Annexure IV, File XIV of the documents) says that a mob of 500 people was holding up the traffic.
Ten bodies were taken to Ramol, an area near Naroda and a massive funeral rally of over 5,000-6,000 mourners took the bodies to Hatkeshwar crematorium in the afternoon.
At 11:55 am a PCR message is sent out saying that the Hindu mob had become violent and had set a vehicle on fire and was indulging in arson on the highway.
Message at 11.55 a.m. on 28.2.2002 (Page No. 6162 Annexure IV File XV) saying that “Sayyed Saheb, the Protocol Officer had informed Sola-1 that riots have started at Sola civil hospital at the High Court where the dead bodies were brought.”
Again, there is another message with no indication of time (Page No..6172 of 28.2.2002) that states that the officers and employees of the hospital had been surrounded by a 500 strong mob and they could not come out”. The message also made a demand for more security for the civil hospital at Sola.
Annexure IV File XIV- Message No. 5907 and 5925 at 11:58 a.m. on 28.2.2002 shows that when 10 dead bodies were taken from Ramol Jantanagar to the Hatkeshwar cremation ground, a crowd of 5,000-6,000 persons accompanied this procession.
On the morning of 28.2.2002, a SIB message (on page 258 of Annexure III File XIX, message No. Com/538/28/2/02) says that a funeral procession was allowed to take place at Khedbrahma, a town in Sabarkantha district. The message adds that soon after the funeral procession 2 Muslims on their way to Khedbrahma were stabbed and the situation had become very tense.
The subsequent message at page No. 262 of the same file (Annexure III File XIX) mentions that 150 Bajrang Dal workers were on their way from Ayodhya to Khedbrahma.
Another message at page 254 (Annexure III file XIX) – Com/574/2002 sent out at 15.32 p.m. on 28.2.2002 states that one more victim of the tragic train burning at Godhra, Babubhai Harjibhai Patel, resident at Vaghrol, Tal. Vadali in Sabarkantha was brought back and a funeral procession was organised in the town.
Warnings about the deliberate mobilization
At page 365 of Annexure III File XXI( D-166) message No. 73/02 dated 28.2.2002 sent by the ACP(Intelligence) Surat Region to State Intelligence Bureau Headquarters at Gandhinagar, says that between 9-10 a.m. on the morning of 28.2.2002, a meeting was held at Sardar Chowk in Vapi Town where Dinesh Kumar Behri of VHP and Acharya  Brahmbatt of Bajrang Dal , Jawahar Desai of BJP and Vinod Chowdhary of RSS made inflammatory speeches regarding the incident at Godhra and called upon the Hindus to unite.
Another message at page 188 in Annexure III, File XVIII sent at 20:38 hours on the day of the Godhra train burning tragedy, i.e., 27.2.2002, mentions the following: “Dilip Trivedi, the General Secretary of VHP and Joint Secretary Dr. Jaideep Patel and Kaushik Mehta in a Joint Statement issued by them have declared that innocent Ram Bhatt’s have been attacked and hence Gujarat Bandh has been declared. They have also stated that the attack on the Ramsevaks returning from Ayodhya was pre-planned by the Muslims. Innocent ladies were molested and compartments were set on fire and Ramsevaks were burnt alive.”
The joint statement issued by the three senior-most office bearers of Gujarat VHP’s unit was clearly designed to stoke communal passion. A reasonable response would have been an immediate government clampdown on such public utterances and if required putting all these trouble makers under preventive detention.  But no such action was taken. The VHP called for a bandh on the 28th February and the BJP, the ruling party, openly supported the bandh call. The State, instead of clamping down on the bandh call, gave the VHP leaders and its cadres a free reign and a license to kill. 
At page 345, the message titled Vardhi No. 24 contained in Annexure III File XIX dated 27.2.2002 sent from D.O., Ahmedabad to the Intelligence Office at Virangam (Virangam is in Ahmedabad rural district) stated that 50 to 75 members of the VHP and Bajrang Dal had gathered at Virangam town chali and in the Golwada area and the situation was very tense.
Another message in the same file, i.e., Annexure III, File XVIII (D-160) at Page No. 19 Message No. 531 ifrom SIB Police to KR Singh at 1810 hours on 27.2.2002 said that, “on 27.2.2002 at 4.30 p.m. when the train arrived at the Ahmedabad Railway station, the kar sevaks were armed with ‘dandas’ and shouting murderous slogans ‘khoon ka badla khoon’ and ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’.”
Fax Mes. D-1/  HA/ Jaher Sabha/ Junagadh/ 311/02 dated.27.2.02 at10.12 pm sent by PI, CID, Int. Bhavnagar to IG, Guj. State IB, Gandhi Nagar said that Sadhu Samaj president Gopalnandji gave an agitated speech at Junagadh Kadva chowk, on dt.27.2.02 between19.30 to 21.00 hrs. The message then goes on to name specific local VHP leaders and says that they expressed their condolences to Kar Sevaks and then delivered hate speeches and urged all Hindus to unite and told the audience to chop the hands and legs of our enemies. They said in their speech that the incident that occurred at Godhra in the morning at 7.30a.m., yet there was no reaction from the Hindus which was very unfortunate. “Muslims who live in India with sincerity and patriotism, we don’t have any agitation against them. But we have objections against those who lived in India and favour Pakistan and carried out activities against the country. Anti- national activities are being done in Madrasas. We have objection against it. We do not have any kind of objection against spiritual religious education to the children. Pooja prathna at the temple and pray in the Masjid but Pakistan Zindabad is not right. Above mention ideas were expressed by them.”
Fax Mes. Com/HM/550/ 02 Dt.27.2.02 23:59 Out No.398 from ACP, Int. G’nagar Region to IG, Guj. State IB, Gandhi Nagar says that 50 Karsevaks travelling by a special bus from Ahmedabad reached Modasa centre in village Vadagam at Taluka Dhansura at around 18:30 pm on 27.2.02. “They were received by a mob of 500 people and these kar sevaks addressed the mob and told the people how the compartment of Sabarmati Express was attacked. People present in the mob got excited and at 21:30 p.m. people from around the village gathered and the mob swelled to a huge size. To maintain law and order the force was not sufficient and about 10 paan bidi shops were set on fire. Vehicles like Jeep, Maruti and Ambassador were set on fire. Vehicles and shops seem to belong to Muslims. One Yasinbhai Multani’s shop at Kalol center TaKadi, Bavlu PS village Kalyanpur was burnt down by the mob”.
Throughout February 28, 2002 while fires were set all over Ahmedabad city, PCR records show that repeated calls from different areas to the Fire Brigade drew went answered.
Table of Phone Records 
Call Type
Cell-No (Name)
Duration Secs
Date-Time
Dialed / Received No – Name
Outgoing
9825037439
A P Patel
(Accused No 1, Mr Modi)
77
27.2.2002
09:39:38

9825023887
Mr Jaideep Patel VHP General Secretary
(Accused No 21)
Outgoing
9825037439
A P Patel
(Accused No 1, Mr Modi)
20
27.2.2002
09:41:39
9825023887
Mr Jaideep Patel VHP General Secretary
(Accused No 21)
 The Protest Petition prays for the charge sheeting of all the accused, a transfer of the further investigation to an independent agency and an admitting of the Petition.
(Trustees, Citizens for Justice and Peace)
I.M. Kadri                              Taizoon Khorakiwala                  Nandan Maluste      
Cyrus Guzder                        Arvind Krishnaswamy                Javed Akhtar
Alyque Padamsee                  Anil Dharker                             Ghulam Peshimam             
Rahul Bose                            Javed Anand                            Teesta Setalvad
Cedric Prakash

The colour Maps are annexed to Protest Petition

October 23, 2011

News report on upcoming protest against censorship of History syllabus at Delhi Univ on 24 Oct 2011

From: Outlook

Ramayana Essay: Protest, Signature Campaign in DU

PTI | New Delhi | Oct 23, 2011

Groups of teachers and students will come together tomorrow to voice their displeasure and protest the removal of scholar A K Ramanujan's essay on Ramayana from the history syllabus even as an online signature campaign against the decision gathers steam.

The group of mostly Left-bent organisations, with participating teachers and students from Delhi University and outside, will hold a protest march starting from the Vivekananda Statue and culminate at the Vice Chancellor's office to resist what they call an attack on history by right wing groups.

The issue was first raised way back in 2008 when a group of ABVP members stormed the history department to protest the inclusion of Three Hundred Ramayana's in the curriculum.

It came to life again earlier this month when the University Academic Council decided to do away with the essay over-ruling the history department council's recommendation in favour of its continuation.

An online signature campaign too began, with a protest note addressed to the Vice Chancellor, already signed by over 960 people as on Sunday. Notable among the names who have singed the online petition are Prof Bipin Chandra, Prof Romila Thapar and Prof Mridula Mukherjee.

"To delete it (the essay) from the syllabus is an act that is deeply disturbing, an instance of thought policing. Such a measure will only encourage sectarian groups to try and prevent intellectuals from expressing their ideas freely," reads the petition.

The essay, which offers a number of tellings of the epic story of Lord Rama, including the Jain, Buddhist and Kannada narratives, had not gone down well with sections of the right wing, some of whom called it "blasphemous".

The groups that will join tomorrow's protest include the All India Democratic Students Organisation (AIDSO), All India Students Federation (AISF), All India Students Association (AISA), Students Federation of India (SFI) and Democratic Teachers Front (DTF) among others.

"Should we allow the rightist forces to abolish the subject of history itself by replacing historical inquiry with assertions of faith?" asks a leaflet circulated by the agitating groups.

The Department Council of History faculty had met last week to discuss the issue and to condemn the decision taken by the university's top academic body.

The decision in the Academic Council too had been made in a stormy meeting and at least nine members had raised strong dissent over the issue.

"Hundreds of Ramayana stories popular in India and elsewhere in Asia are part of our shared and diverse heritage ... Should we bury those Ramayanas that are unacceptable to the self appointed custodians of Hindu morality," asks the statement.

January 11, 2011

March 27, 2010

India: Daughter of Ahsan Jafri Petitions Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

27 March 2010

PRESS RELEASE

Daughter of the murdered M.P. Ahsan Jafri urges Supreme Court Justice K.G. Balakrishnan not to preside over the convocation where Chief Minister Modi will be Chief Guest

A petition started by the daughter of Ahsan Jafri, the former M.P. who was murdered during the Gujarat massacre of 2002, and signed by hundreds of peace loving Indians and other world citizens, is submitted to Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India, and Justice Ahmed Musa Ebrahim, the Former Judge of the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe, urging them not to share the platform with the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Shri Narendra Modi.

Justice Balakrishnan and Justice Ahmed Musa Ebrahim are invited by the Gujarat National Law University to preside over its first annual convocation, to be held on Sunday, the 28th of March, where CM Narendra Modi would be the Chief Guest.

Outlining the concerns of the victims of Gujarat massacre of 2002, the petition says, “An association of the Chief Justices of India and Zimbabwe with a person who is being examined for his role in the killing of innocent people, under the directives of the Supreme Court will send out wrong signals and undermine the process of justice in Gujarat.”

It further states, “we are at an important threshold of the justice process in Gujarat against the Chief Minister Narendra Modi, in the case for conspiracy into mass murder (Zakia Ahsan Jafri and Citizens for Justice and Peace). For the first time in the history of this country the chief minister will be questioned by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) into direct allegations of his complicit role in the 2002 violence.”

The Petition applauds the role played by the Supreme Court in ensuring justice in Gujarat, “You have been a staunch supporter of this struggle”, and reminds the Justices, “Not long ago, Supreme Court of India had called the Chief Minister Narendra Modi a modern day “Nero”.
_________________________

The Petition is located at: http://www.petitiononline.com/cjp2010/petition.html

December 09, 2009

A Transnational Platform To Take on the Fundamentalists : Call / Sign-on Statement

Text of Charter of International Bureau for Laicite

International Bureau for Laicite*

Considering that:

-- The so-called theory of ’clash of civilisations’ between a ’Christian West’ on the one hand, and a ’Muslim Orient’ on the other, is gaining ground, in total disregard of all people the world over, who have been fighting in favour of a political model founded on principles of secularism,

-- In the name of defending the ’right to difference’, numerous states are legitimizing differences of rights between citizens depending on their faith, thereby fueling communalisms,

-- With the help of religions, governments try to draw people into warlike confrontations

-- In addition to fighting against existing disparities between men and women, women have to unceasingly defend their hard won rights, notably equality in the realm of social and professional rights and bodily rights,

-- That, in many countries, the rise of different fundamentalisms has come to increase the subordination of women

-- Despite a movement towards secularisation and the decline of religions, globalisation of neoliberal policies (favoured by the Washington consensus) that emerged in the 80’s, stimulated the march towards privatisation and commoditisation of all human activities, and exacerbated inward looking communalism (the disengagement of the state necessitated the recourse to traditional forms of solidarity, substituing national solidarity with the principle of charity),

-- The alliance that a communalized Left does not hesitate to make with religious organisations, in the name of fighting ’western imperialism’, is damaging, as is the neoliberal disinvestment by the State from the social sphere that has allowed religious organisations to occupy that space

-- The current economic crisis has accentuated inequalities and poverty,

-- However, there has been a convergence of secularist, feminist and social struggles, everywhere in the world ;

The organisations and persons listed below have come together to set up the International Bureau for Laïcite, based on the present resolution, in order to promote secularism internationally.

1. We affirm our commitment to secularism. The principle of secularism, notably the strict separation of State and religion, guarantees the non interference of religion in the sphere of state authority; as well as a real independance of religious and faith based organisations of civil society vis-a-vis the state. Secularism guarantees to citizens the absolute freedom of conscience: the right to believe, the right to disbelieve, the right to change faith, as well as the right to freedom of expression. Consequently, the right to criticize religions is not to be put into question and it takes precedence above all moves to institute ’ defamation of religions and their prophets’ as a crime.

2. We affirm our commitment to the principle of equality and the universality of rights. We believe in a republican conception of citizenship, and we reject all systems which, in the name of particularisms, segment the body politic, either by privileging one category of citizens or by excluding it. Therefore we intend to fight against all forms of discriminations, notably those faced by women and the minorities.

3. We refuse the globalized predatory and destructive neoliberal policies which accentuate pauperisation, whose first victims are women and children; state disengagement fosters the retreat of national solidarity in favour of traditional solidarities of ’communal’ type. In wake of neoliberalism, we call for the internationalisation of struggles.

On the 9th of December 2009**, we call on organisations and individuals who identify with the principles of this statement to support and sign it, and join us.

To sign up : http://laicity.info/bli/

*After consultation, we finally resolve to use the French concept/word ‘Laicite’ in the name of our platform. The reason for it is that the word ’secularism’ in English conveys the notion of equal tolerance of the state vis a vis all religions, rather than the notion of separation between ’Churches’/religions and the state as well as the total disinvestment of the state regarding religions, which is embeded into the French concept of laicite. Rare scholars have of late started to use the neologism ‘Laicity’, but we feel that it is not known to activists and to public at large.

** On the 9th of December 1905, France voted the Law of Separation of Churches and State

The founders of the BLI :
Coalition for a Secular State, Serbia
Collectif citoyen pour l’égalité et la laïcité (CCIEL), Montréal
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain
Development Alternatives with Women for A New Era (DAWN), international network
Equal Rights Now – Organisation against Women’s Discrimination in Iran
Iran Solidarity
Iranian Secular Society
MAREA, feminist journal, Genova, Italy
Parti pour la Laïcité et la Démocratie (ex MDSL), Algérie
Protagoras, Croatia
One Law for All Campaign against Sharia Law in Britain
Organization for Women’s Liberation (OWL), Iran
Secularism Is A Women’s Issue (SIAWI), international network
Union des Familles Laïques (UFAL), France
Women’s Initiative for Citizenship and Universal Rights (WICUR) international network
Women in Black - Belgrade (WIB), Serbia
Women Living Under Muslim Laws (WLUML), international network

and

Zarizana Abul Aziz, lawyer, human rights activist, Malaysia
Samia Allalou, journaliste, Algérie/France
Hakim Arabdiou, militant laïque, Algérie/France
Soheib Bencheikh, théologien, spécialiste des religions et de la laicité, ancien mufti de Marseille, France
Djemila Benhabib, auteure de Ma vie à contre-Coran, récipiendaire du Prix des écrivains francophones d’Amérique et finaliste pour le prix du gouverneur général 2009, Québec
Codou Bop, journaliste, Dakar, Sénégal
Caroline Brancher, co-responsable du secteur féminisme et laïcité de l’UFAL, France
Ariane Brunet, co-fondatrice de Urgent Action Fund, Montréal,Québec
Sonia Correa, co-coordinator of Sexuality Policy Watch and Research -Associate at ABIA (Brazilian Interdisciplinary Association for AIDS (Brazil)), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
Yvonne Deutsch, feminist peace activist, Jerusalem
Lalia Ducos, présidente de WICUR, Algérie/France
Aldo Facio, Feminist Human Rights Activist and Lawyer, Costa Rica
Gigi Franscisco, coordinator of the DAWN international network, Manila, The Philippines
Pierre Galand, président du Centre d’action laïque (CAL), Belgique
Nadia Geerts, initiatrice du R.A.P.P.E.L. (www.le-rappel.be/FR)
Laura Guidetti, President and co-founder of MAREA, Genova, Italy
Marieme Helie Lucas, Fondatrice du WLUML et coordinatrice de SIAWI, Algérie/France
Hameeda Hossein, co-chair of South Asians for Human Rights and Chairperson of Ain o Salish Kendra, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Ayesha Imam, Sociologist, human rights activists, Nigeria
Harsh Kapoor, founder of South Asia Citizens Web (sacw.net), India/France
Sultana Kamal, lawyer and human rights activist, Executive Director of Ain O’Salish Kendra, former Advisor to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh,
Cherifa Kheddar, présidente de l’association " Djazairouna" des Familles -Victimes du Terrorisme Islamiste, Algérie
Catherine Kintzler, philosophe de la laïcité, Paris, France
Monica Lanfranco, journalist, co-founder of MAREA, Genova, Italy
Azar Majedi, Présidente de l’OWL, Iran/U.K
Maryam Namazie, Campaigner, Iran/U.K
Fariborz Pooya, Iranian Secular Society, Iran/U.K
Venita Popovic, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Mary Jane Real, lawyer and human rights activist, Manilla, The Philippines
Rhoda Reddock, feminist scholar, Trinidad and Tobago
Henri Pena Ruiz, philosophe de la laïcité, France
Nina Sankari, Présidente de l’Initiative Féministe Européenne (IFE), Pologne
Aisha Shaheed, historian and women’s rights activist, Canada/Pakistan/UK
Mohamed Sifaoui, journaliste, Algérie/France
Fatou Sow, sociologue au CNRS, Dakar, Sénégal
Gila Svirsky, Women In Black, Jerusalem
Lino Veljak, Professor of philosophy, University of Zagreb, founder of PROTAGORAS, Croatia
Vivienne Wee, anthropologist and women’s rights advocate, Singapore and Hong Kong, China
Stasa Zajovic, founder of WIB-Belgrade, coordinator of the Coalition for a Secular State, Serbia

September 15, 2009

Petition to Oman to disallow Modi's visit

Friends:

The Sultanate of Oman is inviting Gujarat CM Mr. Narendra Modi to lead a business delegation (http://tt.ly/2q) to develop a port in Gujarat.

In February-March 2002, as Chief Minister of Gujarat, Mr. Modi presided over and orchestrated widespread riots in which about 2000 innocent men, women, and children were massacred and more than 200,000 were rendered homeless. Tens of thousands of displaced Muslims are still unable to return to their homes for the fear of further attacks. The process of justice has been subverted in Gujarat in order to deny justice to the Gujarati minorities. There have been many incidences of harassment of Christians and burning of their Churches.

Now Mr. Modi wants to become the Prime Minister of India some day. Indian electorate, however, has rejected his politics of hate at the last national election. So he is desperately courting foreign investments and collaborations to mend his image as a progressive leader towards that goal of becoming the prime minister. If Mr. Modi succeeds in moving to the Center, it would be a slap in the face of all those who care for human rights and seek justice for the victims of Gujarat genocide.

The US and larger Europe have shut the door on Modi by denying him the visa. He is courting smaller countries in a hope that once the door opens, even if slightly, in time it will open wide enough to propel him to the Center. We have to stop that. That process starts by signing this petition.

Please sign the petition to Oman government to show your concerns about their invitation to Mr. Modi. The petition URL is: http://www.petitiononline.com/modi2009/petition.html

September 10, 2009

After Ishrat Jehan, truth must come out in the Batla House Encounter: Sign petition to reiterate Demand for Judicial Probe

Dear Friends,

After the revelation that ishrat jehan was killed in cold blood, it is time again for us to re-assert that a fair and independent probe must be held in the Batla House 'encounter'. Note that a magisterial enquiry was blocked by the government through the refusal of the Lt. Governor of Delhi to allow for the same. Please sign the petition below and forward it to others on your mailing list.


http://www.PetitionOnline.com/jtsa2009/petition.html

In solidarity,

Manisha
Jamia Teachers' Solidarity Association
0- 9811625577

March 28, 2009

LSE-SOAS Statement Against the Campaign of Varun Gandhi

Statement

We, the faculty, staff, students and alumni of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), wish to dissociate our institutions from the values recently expressed by the politician Varun Gandhi. We note with chagrin that Varun Gandhi's association with these institutions is being used as a testament to his ethics and quality as a politician. His statements are antithetical to the values promoted by our institutions, and to our beliefs about responsible leadership in electoral democracy.

Varun Gandhi is a young politician whose great-grandfather, grandmother and uncle have each been Prime Minister of India. His branch of the family is no longer associated with the Indian National Congress, but instead with the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). He holds a degree from the LSE (BSc in Economics), earned through a distance-learning provision, although he was never admitted to LSE's own undergraduate body. Later he was enrolled at SOAS (MSc in Sociology) but never completed the degree.

The general election to India's parliament will be held over the next month. Varun Gandhi is currently campaigning as the BJP candidate from Pilibhit constituency in Uttar Pradesh. Excerpts from his speeches, widely reported and viewable on the internet, include these statements:

*

"This is the hand of the Lotus [the symbol of the BJP]. After the elections, the hand of the Lotus will slit the throat of Muslims."
*

"Ask all Hindus to unite if you want to save this area from turning into Pakistan."
*

"I am contesting for Hindus. I don't want a single Muslim vote, either from Khalistan [the state sought by Sikh separatists; the Congress candidate is a Sikh] nor from Pakistan."
*

"If somebody lifts a hand against Hindus, or thinks they are weak, there is nobody behind them, then I swear on the Bhagvad Gita that I will cut off that hand."

The Central Election Commission has studied the recordings, found them to be genuine, and informed the BJP that it 'expected' Varun Gandhi to be dropped as a candidate. Despite this, the BJP national executive has refused to cancel Varun Gandhi's candidacy. In doing so, it has given implicit endorsement to a kind of electoral campaigning that severely damages the fragile social relations between religious communities in India. Uttar Pradesh has a long history of violence between religious communities, much of it the result of inflammatory political appeals, which have a demonstrated role in mobilizing religious pogroms.

By our signature here, we emphatically dissociate our institutional values from the ones expressed by Varun Gandhi in the recordings, and condemn his statements.

January 16, 2009

petition against Tatas, Ambanis and Mittal's supporting Modi

Dear Friend

The collective amnesia of the captains of Indian industry, Messrs.Tata, Mittal and Ambani embracing Narendra Modi and endorsing his candidature as future PM of India, disturbed me immensely.

This petition is my humble effort to engage the conscience of corporate India and make it known to them that the Indian citizen is not to be trifled with.Just as we can vote for or against the poitician, we can pinch the corporate bottom-line in order to engage their attention to mend their ways.

It is not an easy task for us to keep our cell phones and Blackberries switched off for an entire day on January 30th,- the 61st anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi's assassination.

However, it ought to be sufficient to get the message across to corporate India that we will not tolerate the endorsement of fascists as future Prime Ministers.

May I request you visit the link below to sign and thereafter circulate the petition below, if you feel as strongly about this matter

sincerely
Ranjan Kamath

The petition title is: Cellular Silence Day_30th January 2009.
The petition URL is: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/30JAN09/petition.html

The petition is directed to: India Inc.
The start date is: ..January 15th, 2009
The end date is: ..January 30th, 2009

The petition statement says:


Dear Messrs, Ratan Tata, Sunil Mittal and Anil Ambani


I am one of a billion Indian citizens.

I am somewhere in the middle of that pyramid that you wish to give voice - from bottom to top - through wealth creation.

I am proud of the brands you represent that have made India proud.

I am one of the burgeoning Indian middle-class that share your aspirations of mutating India from indolent elephant to thundering tiger.

It ends there...

I have hitherto been accused of being indifferent and apathetic, simply because I am overawed and felt overwhelmed in a system replete with Goliaths.

But when I saw you embrace the fascist mastermind of state sponsored genocide as a future Prime Minister and endorse the Modi-fication of India, it was disappointingly apparent that the brands that aspire to make India rich shall continue to languish in ethical poverty.

While I am filled with revulsion at your endorsement of Narendra Modi, I must respect your right to do so as a fellow citizen.

In writing this petition I am a mere David amongst the mightiest corporate Goliaths but I feel empowered to address your collective amnesia - through recollection of the Gujarat pogrom of 2002 - by the true Goliath among Gujaratis in particular and Indians in general - Mohandas Gandhi.

All those who sign this petition will switch off their Tata Indicomm, Airtel and Reliance cellular phone and broadband connections from midnight on January 30th 2009.

It is eminently possible that I might be the one voice in a billion who will observe the 61st death anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi on as Cellular Silence Day.

Then again, there might be close to a billion who could join me on January 30th, 2009 expressing their solidarity and silently insisting that the captains of India Inc adopt an ethical, compassionate path to wealth creation rather than the single-minded pursuit of the bottom-line.


We shall know that by the end of 30th January, 2009

September 26, 2007

Text of Petition - Condemning Communalisation of Sethuraman Project

COASTAL STRUGGLE SOLIDARITY
A124/6, First Floor, Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-16
Ph, +91 9871880686 Email: css@movingrepublic.org

With the recent debate on Sethusamudram and the subsequent violence in Bangalore, we feel that there is a conscious attempt to take over a genuine issue concerning environment and fisherpeople's lives by the communal forces. The secular forces and fisherpeople's organisations in this country have expressed their strong dissent against these developments. We are enclosing a statement by a large number of concerned people, fisherpeople's organisations and civil society groups on the recent debate on Sethusamudram Project. We request you to provide adequate coverage in you pubication and support the spirit of secularism, ecology and coastal people's lives.

Thanking you,

Shree Prakash,
For Coastal Struggle Solidarity,
New Delhi
Mobile: 9871880686

--

CONDEMN KILLINGS!!
CONDEMN COMMUNALISATION OF SETHUSAMUDRAM PROJECT!!

We, the undersigned civil society groups, people's movements, human rights organisations and concerned individuals condemn the killings of innocent people and destruction of public property by Hindutva-inspired communal forces recently. A mob, now identified as members of Sangh Parivar organizations, attacked a Tamil Nadu public transport bus in Bangalore recently and burned down the vehicle that was carrying 26 passengers. Two passengers were killed and their bodies were charred beyond recognition. This attack was a part of conscious and systematic efforts of the religious fundamentalist forces to undermine the real issues concerning Sethusamudram Project and to make political capital by flaring up the emotions of the people and dividing them on religious and provincial lines.

The Sethusamudram Project was introduced by the BJP while they were in power at the centre without considering the ecological and human problems. The Sethusamudram Project will endanger a rich biosphere reserve with 400 endangered species, including sea turtles, dolphins, dugongs and whales. The project will destroy the livelihood of 15 Lakh people who depend on fishing and allied areas in the waters where the canal will be dug. Several fisher people's organisations and human rights groups had protested against the project for a long time without getting any recognition from the mainstream political parties. Today the effort by the communal-fundamentalist forces is to divert the real issues concerning the project and generate political gain in view of the forthcoming elections.

We feel that there is an immediate need to stop any further violence &
communalisation of this issue. Hence we call upon all secular forces and social
movements to take a strong stand to condemn these efforts of communal
forces and recognise the real struggles of fisher people. We call upon the civil
society to support the fisher people's struggles to protect the coast from all
destructive developmental projects including Sethusamudram project


The Undersigned

1. Just. H.Suresh, Formal Judge, High court Mumbai
2. Praful Bidwai, Journalist & Writer
3. Arundhati Roy, Activist, Writer
4. Aruna roy
5. Vinod Raina, BGVS, New Delhi
6. Gabriele Dietrich, NAPM
7. Shripad Dharamadhikary, Manthan
8. Bruce Rich, Environmental Defense
9. T.Peter, President KSMTF & Secretary, NFF
10.Gilbert, Tamil Nadu – Pondicherry Fisher people's Forum
11.Anton Gomez, National Union of Fisherpeople
12.R. Mangaiyarselvam, Founder, Meenavar Viduthalai Vengaigal
(Fisherpeople Liberation Tigers)
13.V. Gowrilingam, President, Kancheepuram District Fisher people
Federation,
14.Dr. M. E. Raja, Ph D, General Secretary, National Union of Fishermen,
15.J. Kosumani, President, Tamilnadu Fisherpeople Progressive Assoociation,
16.K. Bharathi, President, South Indian Fishermen's Welfare Association,
17.B. Maran, President, Tamilnadu Fisher People Movement.
18.Dunu Roy , Hazards Centre
19.Kamala Bhasin, SANGAT, New Delhi
20.Harsh Kapoor, South Asia Citizens Web
21.Dr. T.T Sreekumar, Academic, National University of Singapore
22.Madhumitha Dutta, Corporate Accountability Desk
23.Nityanand Jayaraman, Corporate Accountability desk
24. Anivar Aravind, moving Republic, Kerala
25. Wilfred D'Costa, INSAF
26.Benny Kuruvila, FOCUS on Global South Mumbai
27.Mohaji BHAP, Chandigad
28.Prasad Chacko, Action Aid
29.Jacob Nellithanam, Richaria Campaign
30.Mahendra Kumar Rauson, NCDHR, Bihar
31.K.P. Sasi, Visual Search
32.Jai Prakash, PEACE
33.I.K.Shukla, Writer, Los Angeles
34.Himanshu Upadhyaya, Intercultural Resources
35.P.T. George, Intercultural Resources
36.Abhishek Srivastava, Freelance Journalist
37.Navin Kumar, Star News
38.Lalit Batra, researcher
39. Hitendra, Human Rights Law Network
40.Amarjit Singh,
41.S. Majumdar, HRLN
42.Nandini Oza , Manthan, Badwani
43.Praveen, Delhi University
44.Anja K , Researcher
45.Geetanjali, NBA
46.Supriya , DU student
47.Ankitha, DU student
48.Amit , JNU student
49.Harsh Dobhal , Combat law
50.Renu Khanna , PUCL, Baroda
51.Debaranjan, PSSP, Kashipur
52.J.John, Centre for Education & Communication, New Delhi
53.Badar, PEACE, Delhi
54.Surekha, HRLN
55.Andrea Wright, TISS.MADS
56.Lalhlieupuii , JNU student
57.Lalrindiki , Student, Mizoram
58. Nima Lamu Yolmo, JNU student, Darjeling
59.Preeti, Activist
60.Rajesh rangarajan, Activist
61.Vidya Rangan, Activist
62.Sunayana JNU student
63.Simpreet Singh, NAPM
64.Sheena kanwar, Activist
65.Swastika Sanghmithra, Activist
66.Subir Dey , JNU Student
67.Kasturi Sharma, JNU Student
68.Shrikanth , HRLN
69.S. Hussaini, IT consultant
70.Sanja Sharma, HRLN
71.Sarojini, Samad
72.Ritwik
73.Anshu Malviya, poet, Activist, UP
74.Grace Pelly, HRLN
75.HR Hiramat, NCPNR, Karnataka
76.Smriti, HRLN
77.E.P Menon, IDF , Bangalore
78.Pradeep Kumar, SVP, UP
79.Jharna Jhavera, Janmadhyam
80.Mihir Engineer , BOSS institute Kolkotta,
81.Sulak Sivaraksa, SEM, Tailand
82.Irfan Ahmed, Lokmach, Insaf
83.Kousal K, Activist Bihar,
84.Binod Tyagi, Lok Manch, Bihar
85.Rakesh, PEACE
86.Jitendra C, PEACE
87.Anant Deo N, INSAF Bihar
88.Ganesh Prasad, INSAF, UP
89.Ranjeet Kumar Singh, PUCE, INSAF, UP
90.Chittaranjan Singh, PUCL, INSAF, UP
91.Raghavendra kumar Advocate MP
92.Jithendra Kumar, Journalist
93.Umpiliha DSW
94.Mohan Rao, JNU
95.Beena, SAMA
96.Sarojini, SAMA
97.Riwik, SAMA
98.Pakhi, SAMA
99.Jacqulin J, NAPM
100.Deepa Naveen, Activist
101.Swathi Mukharji, JMIICR
102.Mallika Virdi MAATI, Utharghand
103.Jasamia Sarma, Student
104.Anil Tharayath Varghese, NCAS, Pune
105.Ajay, People's watch, Kerala
106.Pradeep Esteves, Activist, Bangalore
107.Savad Rahman, Journalist, Kerala
108.Satyajit Roy
109.Pritham K Chakravarthy- Theatre Activist
110.Sukla Sen, EKTA (Committee for Communal Amity), Mumbai
111.Satya Sivaraman, Journalist
112.Nilanjana Biswas, Freelance Writer, Bangalore
113.Gaurav Dwivedi, Manthan, Badwani, MP
114.Shrish Khare, Manthan, Badwani, MP
115.Edwin, Openspace, Bangalore
116.Manohar.R, South India Cell for Human Rights Education &
Monitoring(SICHREM), Bangalore
117.Rohan D'Souza
118.Nasiruddin Haider Khan
119.Deepak Roy, Film Maker
120.Ranjana Padhi, Activist, Delhi
121.Renu Ghosh, Film maker, Kolkotta
122.K.C. Santhosh Kumar, Activist, Kerala
123. Anuja Jain, Student, New York University
124.Ranjit Thankappan
125.Madhuresh Kumar, CACIM, New Delhi
126.Ashim Jain, Bangalore
127.Souparna Lahiri, NFFPFW
128.K.M.Venugopalan. Writer & Activist, Kerala
129.Carol Geeta, SAMEEKSHA, Ajmeer
130. Raja Swamy, Bangalore
131.Soman Nair, Delhi
132.KH Hussain, Kerala Forest Research Institute
133.Rakesh Sharma, Filmmaker
134.Sushovan Dhar, Vikas Adhyayan Kendra, Mumbai
135.Bobby Kunhu
136.Tapas Ray, Researcher, Urban Affairs and Public Policy, University of
Delaware
137.Asmita Collective, Secunderabad, A.P.
138.Prathibha Ganesan , JNU Student
139.Ranjan Panda, Journalist and Social Worker
140.Ullash Kumar R K, Bangalore
141.Monica Narula, Sarai
142.Benny Francis, Journalist, Chennai
143.Ranjit Panicker, Centre for Post Graduate Studies, Thrissur
144. Raktim Mukhopadhyayu, Bangiya Unnayan Parishad
145.Rosemary Viswanath, EQUATIONS
146.Sukanya Kanarally, Gelathi e-monthly, Karnataka
147.Anindo Banerjee, PRAXIS
148.Aditi Chandra , University of Minnesota
149.Alpana Kannabiran – ASMITA
150.Dr.Pratiksha Baxi - Associate Prof Center for the Study of Law and
Governance, JNU
151.Aanchal Kapur – Kriti
152.Suman Bisht – Kriti
153.Priya Bajpai - Human Rights Law Network
154.Ram - Intercultural Resources
155.Mira Shiva - Initiative for health equity and Society
156.Rahul Chowdhary - Advocate, LIFE
157.Dr. Tapanj Kalita - G B Pant Hospital
158.Dr. Harish Chandra - G B Pant Hospital
159.S A Joshi - Chartered Accountant
160.Anil Patwal - Chartered Accountant
161.Vinay - All India Drug Action Network
162.Mukesh - Hazard Center
163.Niteesh Vikram
164.Priyanka Pandey
165.Rameeta Sagar
166.Sonal
167.Saharsha Sabharwal
168.Umaira Rizvi
169.Huma Maqsood
170.Dr. Yasir
171.Sivija Singh
172.Jagpreet
173.Himmat Singh
174.Reva Dutta
175.Shashvat Pandit
176.Shreya Kumar
177.Varun Tandon
178.Nanaki Singh
179.Phea Suri
180.Shalini Sharma
181.Sreejitha PV , Translator ,New Delhi
182.Sudeep.K.S , New delhi
183. V. Kumaravel, Vangakadal Meen Thozhilalar Sangam, TN
184.Biji, M.phil scholar, Mahatma Gandhi University

August 07, 2007

Punish the Guilty of the Anti Muslim Pogrom of 1992-1993

To: citizens of Mumbai, India and the world

Punish the Guilty of the Anti Muslim Pogrom of 1992-1993
Justice for All

The convictions of the accused in the 1993 Bombay blasts case are intended to be a form of redress for the 250 families who lost dear ones in the serial blasts and aim to send the message that the Indian system delivers justice for all crimes, especially mass crimes of unspeakable brutality. But the bomb blasts of March 12, 1993 were only the external symptoms of a cancer that had gnawed away at Mumbai's vital organs with the abject failure of the state machinery to protect the city's Muslim population during the horrendous communal riots of December 1992 and January 1993. More than three times as many Mumbaikars were killed in the riots that preceded the bomb blasts but the lack of action against the perpetrators of the riots ï¿∏ who are named in the Srikrishna report ï¿∏ is clear evidence of the operation of a double standard of justice, one for the majority community and the other for the minorities. India and it systems of democracy, executive, judiciary and legislature, need to reflect.

The bomb terror of March 12, 1993 must be recalled with the same horror as the mob terror of December 6, 1992, in Ayodhya, resulting in the loss of hundreds of lives all over the country. The causes of the blasts, too, must be revived in public memory. As the Srikrishna report observed: "The serial bomb blasts were a reaction to the totality of events at Ayodhya and Bombay in December 1992 and January 1993ï¿∏ The common link between the riots and the blasts was that of cause and effect."
Information obtained under the Right to Information Act makes it clear that successive state governments, no matter what their political persuasion, have decided to shield the guilty. The motivations of the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Shiv Sena parties in refusing to implement the recommendations of the Srikrishna Commission are obvious: among the individuals named in the report are several of their leaders and cadres, including Bal Thackeray, Manohar Joshi, Gopinath Munde and Madhukar Sarpotdar. What is more shocking is the role of the so-called secular parties. Though the manifestos of both the Congress Party and the Nationalist Congress Party in 1999 and 2004 promised to implement the recommendations of the report, these promises remain unfulfilled.

The report also lays bare the biased role played by 31 police officers, including RD Tyagi, who as then joint commissioner, shot dead nine persons at the Suleiman Usman Bakery labelling them "Kashmiri terrorists". Another senior police officer, NK Kapse was promoted after a departmental inquiry exonerated him of any guilt in shooting down seven persons at the Hari Masjid located at Rafi Ahmed Kidwai Marg. Save one policeman who was dismissed from service, all others have escaped lightly despite being found guilty of complicity in acts of murder and arson.

The RTI findings also demonstrate a complete absence of vigour in pursuing riot-related cases through the judicial system. Cases have been closed in a seemingly arbitrary fashion and appeals have not been filed against acquittals in the lower courts. If a genuine peace is to return to Mumbai, there must be justice. Continued injustices cause schisms to widen, wounds to fester. Justice can only be truly served by implementing the recommendations of the Srikrishna Commission report. We urge the state government to do so immediately. It must devote as much energy and resources to obtaining justice for the victims of the Mumbai riots as it mustered up for the victims of the Mumbai bomb blasts. We also believe that the process must be visible and transparent. Only then will the deep wounds caused by the targeted violence of 1992-1993 heal, bringing enduring peace.

Public Release of the Statement/Signature Campaign Indian Merchants Chamber, Churchgate August 9, 2007; 5.30 p.m.
Contact:
Justice For All Campaign, Telephone:
022-26602288/26603927
Email: sabrang@sabrang.com

SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN:
Vijay Tendulkar
Anil Dharker
Naresh Fernandes
Ram Rehman
Teesta Setalvad
Nandan Maluste
Arvind Krishnaswamy
Javed Anand

Sincerely,

To sign the petition, click on www.PetitionOnline.com/jus4all/petition.html