Resources for all concerned with culture of authoritarianism in society, banalisation of communalism, (also chauvinism, parochialism and identity politics) rise of the far right in India (and with occasional information on other countries of South Asia and beyond)
“Eco-terrorists”: right-wing populist media about “ecologists” and the public opinion on the environmental movement in Poland
Piotr Żuk
https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2055551
Explained: ‘Trads’ vs ‘Raitas’ and the Inner Workings of India's Alt-Right
by Alishan Jafri and Naomi Barton (The Wire, 11 Jan 2022)
In
the past few years, a significant number of young men and women in
India have been attracted to a dangerous alt-right digital ecosystem
called 'trad-wing', in which they serve as self-styled civilisational
warriors.
In August 2017,
acolytes of the “altright”
in the United
States held a rally
in Charlottesville,
chanting slogans
such as “Jews will
not replace us!” and
carrying torches like
those used at Ku
Klux Klan rallies.
IN A PHOTOGRAPHPOSTED to Facebook
in 2011, an American man named John Morgan stands on the banks of the
Ganga in Varanasi, wearing a white dhoti. He smiles, and holds a small
bag in his hand. The sun is setting over the river, into which, just
moments earlier, he had scattered the ashes of his beloved cat. When the
photo was taken, Morgan had been living in India for two years.
Several of his friends commented on the photo. “I didn’t know that
you are inclined towards Sahajiya Vaishnavism. Traditional Gaudiya
Vaishnavism sorts that path better,” one wrote.
“I’m interested in everything Vedic,” Morgan replied. “I’m not even
certain that I’m really a Gaudiya Vaishnava, since I find the Sri
Vaishnavas and even Advaita Vedanta fascinating.”
A few comments down, he responded to a friend’s speculation that he
may be a Saivite, a worshipper of the Hindu god Shiva. “Mahaprasade
govinde nama brahmani vaishnava…” Morgan wrote, invoking a prayer typically sung by the Hare Krishnas. “I chanted that as I read it,” his friend replied.
At first glance, Morgan may have seemed like any number of Western
tourists, travelling in India and trying on different styles of
spiritualism. But Morgan was not just another tourist. He is a
co-founder, and until recently, was the editor-in-chief, of Arktos—the
world’s largest and most influential publishing house for the
“alt-right.”
The alt-right—a loose affiliation of white nationalists, white
supremacists, neo-monarchists, masculinists, reactionaries,
conspiracists, neo-paganists and social-media trolls—has come to define a
new, extreme-right political discourse emboldened by Donald Trump’s
victory in the 2016 US presidential election. Obsessed with white
identity and perceived threats to it, the alt-right in the United States
and Europe generally yearns for the coming of a golden age—though the
nature of that golden age is internally disputed. For some, it is a
1950s America of strict gender roles and a racially divided society
before the expansion of civil rights for non-whites. For others it is a
resurrected Roman Empire, and for others still a resurrected Persian
Empire.
All of these longed-for ages, among various others, are models for a
supposed white utopia, either with tolerated cohabitation with
subordinate “non-Aryans,” or a territory cleansed of those undesirables.
Although such ideologies are clearly fascistic and Nazi-like, most
alt-righters categorically reject such taxonomy, preferring euphemisms
such as “identitarian,” “traditionalist” and “alt-right” itself. An
amorphous and factional group prone to territorial infighting, the
alt-right has nevertheless materialised in internet memes, street
violence and rallies designed to intimidate minorities. The far-right
broadly has a long-standing history of violence and terrorism, but the
alt-right claims to be different, and attempts to distance itself from
extremism. Yet one alt-right rally, in the US city of Charlottesville in
August 2017, resulted in the death of a 32-year-old woman, Heather
Heyer, and the injury of dozens, when an alt-right demonstrator plowed
his car into a crowd of peaceful counterprotestors. White supremacists
at the rally chanted “Jews will not replace us!” and carried torches
that harkened back to Ku Klux Klan lynching rallies around the turn of
the twentieth century.
Arktos was incorporated in November 2009, and was among the first to
translate and publish many of the international texts that have formed
the alt-right canon. The works it prints or resells have also begun to
creep into the mainstream, as right-wing politicians across Europe and
the United States adopt them. In January 2017, just days before Trump’s
inauguration, the company officially partnered with the de-facto face of
the alt-right, the neo-Nazi Richard Spencer, to found the “Alt-Right
Corporation”—an organisation created to foment, as Spencer was quoted as
saying in The Atlantic magazine, “a total integration of the
European New Right and the US alt-right.” Arktos is now based in
Hungary, and represents the European wing of the corporatised alt-right.
It has published in nearly every European language, and has produced,
according to the US-based non-profit the Southern Poverty Law Center,
nearly 180 unique titles.
But before all that, Arktos’s first home was India. The publishing
house’s presence in the country was no coincidence. Although Morgan and
his Swedish co-founder Daniel Friberg have both stated this was purely
for the sake of keeping operational costs down, evidence suggests
otherwise. Arktos has displayed a surprising affinity for religious
systems and philosophies rooted in India. The publishing house seems to
be inspired by certain strains of Hindu thought, although it often
refers to “Vedism” instead of “Hinduism,” and conceives of the ideas it
venerates as more “Aryan” than South Asian.
Arktos has also fostered direct connections with Indian politicians,
holding meetings with prominent members of the Hindu-nationalist
Bharatiya Janata Party and its parent organisation, the Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh, at least twice—though both meetings occurred several
months before the BJP came to power under Prime Minister Narendra Modi
in May 2014. On another occasion, Morgan has said, Arktos coordinated a
meeting between BJP officials and members of the far-right,
anti-immigrant Hungarian party Jobbík. Friberg claims to have conducted
over a hundred meetings with influential figures in India, including
politicians, religious leaders and publishers.
Beyond its first-hand connections with the BJP and Jobbík, as well as
the far-right Sweden Democrats, Arktos has links to the National Front
of France, the National Democratic Party of Germany, Ukraine’s Svoboda,
Greece’s Golden Dawn, the British National Party, Italy’s Lega Nord, and
others. Arktos has also bragged about its connections to the Trump
administration via Steve Bannon, the executive chair of the alt-right
media outlet Breitbart News, who served as Trump’s chief strategist
until August 2017. Though it is unclear what concrete results, if any,
have come from these links betweeen Arktos and global politicians, it
seems obvious that the publisher is intent on forging ties with radical
right-wingers across the world.
White-supremacist interest in India is not unique to Arktos. Lengthy
essays dedicated to South Asian religious texts appear on prominent
alt-right blogs. American Vanguard, an organisation that coordinated the
deadly Charlottesville rally in August, sold T-shirts with a Nazi
skull-and-crossbones wearing sunglasses and the slogan “Surf the Kali
Yuga” printed boldly below, referring to the Hindu notion that we are
currently living in a dark epoch. According to the Southern Poverty Law
Center, following the Charlottesville rally, the group Identity
Evropa—which was one of the event’s organisers—teamed up with Arktos to
“promote identitarian literature with university students.” Eli Mosley
Kline, Identity Evropa’s CEO at the time, had been previously
photographed wearing Vanguard America’s “Kali Yuga” shirt.
Just before the US election, as Trump was about to enter a final
presidential debate, Richard Spencer tweeted—referencing the avatar of
Vishnu who, it is believed, will appear at the end of the Kali Yuga to
battle evil forces—“Hopefully, Trump as Kalki the destroyer will end
them.” I FIRST REACHED OUT to Morgan via email in September
2016, just a day after Hillary Clinton, Trump’s opponent in the US
presidential race, brought discussion of the alt-right into the public
sphere by famously calling its acolytes a “basket of deplorables.” We
spoke in an unrecorded Skype interview, and he declined to speak with me
further after I questioned him on how close his beliefs were to Nazism.
I later interviewed Morgan in person, in January 2017, in Budapest,
where he lives. I met him in a small Hungarian restaurant near the US
embassy in the city. Soft-faced and sometimes sporting a thin goatee,
Morgan does not consider himself a hate-monger, although he has
acknowledged in public speeches and interviews that there are
hate-mongers present within his immediate circle. A nasal voice and
tendency to defer to authors or scholarship to explain his views seem to
have made him a largely unknown figure within the “alt-right,” and he
prefers to avoid the intensity and visibility of activism. He told me
that he has always been drawn to right-wing values through his “love of
ideas” rather than any innate prejudice.
Born in 1973 to upper-middle-class parents and raised on Long Island,
near New York City, Morgan is bookish, with a scepticism towards the
modern world. “I always had a sense very early on that there was
something wrong with society and culture in general, but I could never
really put my finger on it,” he said in a 2014 interview, published in
the Journal for the Study of Radicalism. Morgan said he briefly
flirted with leftist ideas before drifting to the right. He graduated
from the University of Michigan with a degree in literature in 1997.
In 1998, Morgan came across the book Hitler’s Priestess, a
biography of the esoteric Hitlerian Savitri Devi, written by the
historian Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke. A European woman, born in France as
Maximiani Portas, Devi spent her life blending Hindu spiritualism and
nationalism with Nazism. “Savitri Devi herself was an interesting, if
problematic figure,” Morgan said in the 2014 interview. But what really
interested him in that book, he added, were the author’s passing
mentions of other writers, whom Morgan called “the
traditionalists”—Julius Evola, René Guénon, and “all these figures who I
had never heard of before that time, or maybe had just heard
referenced, but didn’t know anything about them.”
In 2006, bored by his job as a “low-level administrator” at his alma
mater, Morgan became involved with a publishing house called Integral
Tradition Publishing with “some friends”—Patrick Boch and Jacob
Christiansen Senholt—while maintaining his day job at the university.
ITP was designed as a platform for “traditionalist” writers such as
Evola, who is now widely regarded as one of the most influential racial
fascists of the twentieth century. When I interviewed Morgan, he told me
that he was also drawn to ideas of the transcendent and the spiritual,
and even “flirted with Sufism for a little while.”
In November 2008, Barack Obama was elected as US president, following
George W Bush. Morgan disliked both of them. Fed up with politics in
the United States, he decided to relocate to India to work on ITP full
time. He had never left the United States except to go to Canada. In
February 2009, he joined Boch at an ashram in Mumbai that was affiliated
with the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, or ISKCON: an
organisation of the devotees of AC Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada,
commonly known as “Hare Krishnas.” Morgan began working full-time on ITP
and, that year, published the first English-language edition of an
autobiography of Evola.
Boch had just graduated from the University of Buckingham’s law
school in 2006 when he helped start ITP. When Arktos was registered in
the United Kingdom, Boch had provided an address in the Powai
neighbourhood of Mumbai as his own. He was listed as a director of the
company until 2010. Friberg recently said that Boch still lives in India
and is a practising Hare Krishna.
Eventually, Morgan made his way to a remote ashram in Salem, Tamil
Nadu, run by a controversial right-wing guru called Bhakti Vikasa Swami.
A white man who was raised in the United Kingdom, and joined ISKCON at
the age of 18, Vikasa Swami is known within ISKCON as a highly
conservative interpreter of scripture. He has been banned from at least
five temples in the United States, and has written a book that was
banned by the ISKCON Governing Body Commission, titled Women: Masters or Mothers?
The book proposes that girls should be married as children, no girl
should receive an education beyond cooking and cleaning, women must
never divorce, even if their husband is abusing them, and that it is stri dharma—womanly
duty—for women to essentially be slaves to their husbands. In an
interview with one devotee whose husband beat her, he advised, “Follow
your stri-dharma as far as possible. When he beats you a lot go and live
with your brother and then return. But you should follow stri-dharma in
spite of all circumstances.”
In India, Morgan lived the ascetic life typical of ashram existence.
He woke up at 4 am to pray, meditate and have breakfast, did
Arktos-related work throughout the day, and in the evening did work for
the ashram.
In a 2016 interview with the white-nationalist radio programme Red
Ice, Morgan recounted how, on a tour of South Asian holy sites, while
chanting mantras and waiting for a swami to speak, he saw a “short, dark
homeless guy” who was muttering to himself. “He walked up to me, and,
without saying a word, he knelt down in front of me and started pressing
his forehead against my feet,” Morgan recounted. “In south India, they
have these myths that white Gods would come across the ocean and bring
wisdom, and some people hold to these myths.”
Henrik Palmgren, the show’s host—and currently a partner in Friberg’s
Alt-Right Corporation—laughed, “Aryan! You have come to save me!”
Morgan laughed along.
Morgan left India in 2013, though he continued to refer to himself as
a Vaishnava Hindu in interviews, on web forums and on internet message
boards for several years afterwards. More recently, however, he has said
that he has abandoned ISKCON.
Eventually, Morgan and his partners at ITP connected with NFSE-Media
AB, a wide-ranging media project integral to several far-right cultural
websites, such as Metapedia, a far-right online enyclopaedia, which
declares that its mission is to counter “semantic distortion worldwide.”
Its entry on the Holocaust, for example, opens with “The Holocaust is
according to politically correct history a deliberate genocide by
National Socialist Germany in which approximately six million Jews were
killed.” The bulk of the entry contains a rundown of revisionist and
Holocaust-denialist perspectives.
Another initiative of NFSE-Media AB is Nordisk.nu, a popular neo-Nazi
forum frequented by the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik, who was
responsible for a massacre at a youth summer camp in 2011 that killed
77 people, many of them under the age of 18. (Breivik, in a 1,500-page
manifesto, praised Hindu nationalists as his allies, urging them to
fight alongside him and other white nationalists. This led some Hindu
leaders to deny any ideological connections with Breivik; the RSS’s Ram
Madhav called the manifesto “motivated propaganda.”)
Through NFSE-Media, Morgan connected with Daniel Friberg, one of the
co-founders of Metapedia. A Swedish skinhead who has grown out his hair,
traded in his jackboots for brogues, and is often seen wearing a suit,
Friberg has garnered support within the extreme right with his
well-coiffed appearance, and attempts to cultivate a genteel persona.
But where Morgan’s demeanour is milquetoast, Friberg relishes
aggression. He has trouble maintaining eye-contact and his mannerisms
are stiff. He thinks hard before he tells a joke, and his punchlines are
nearly always insults. On 31 December 2016, I attended a New Year’s
party that Friberg threw in his apartment, where I met him and many
others who are a part of the alt-right. I had declined to drink that
night, which led him to question if I was “a prude,” to which I
responded with uncomfortable laughter. Friberg countered that, since I
was laughing, I must be “a whore.” When I did not laugh at his other
jokes, he called me “autistic.”
A few days later, when I met Friberg for an interview, he told me to
meet him in the Kempinski Hotel lobby in the city centre—a modernist
construction of glass and steel, where he conducts all his press
interviews.
He told me he grew up in an upper-middle-class household with two
highly educated parents, both linguists. His father had a PhD in
linguistics and his mother, he said, “spent way too much time at the
university, studying all sorts of useless crap,” including eight
languages, among them Persian, Arabic and Greek. He described where he
grew up, outside of Gothenburg, as a “nice, homogenous” town that was
“tranquil.” He considered himself an anti-racist, listened to rap music
and was “a liberal” until he was 13, when he met migrant schoolmates,
whom he saw as corrupting delinquents. He said he soon came to terms
with being a nationalist, although he has vehemently claimed he never
has been a “neo-Nazi,” bristling at the term’s historical weight.
In his youth, Friberg was a member of a group originally called Swedish Young National Socialists (National Socialism, or Nationalsocializumus,
was the official ideology of the Third Reich), and police records show
he was arrested for several violent crimes, including throwing a rock
through the window of a Muslim man’s home, and having a stolen gun
hidden under his bed—an AK4, a type of automatic rifle exclusively used
by the Swedish army.
In the early 2000s, Friberg attended Gothenburg University. He never
graduated, although he has lied about this, widely claiming that he
holds an MBA from there. University records show that Friberg was a
mediocre student. When I asked Friberg about this via an emailed
questionnaire, he responded that he “never claimed” to hold an MBA,
despite countless examples where he does, including in a blog post he
wrote in response to a report I published in The Atlantic.
(After I emailed him, he changed the line where he claims to have earned
an MBA to a claim that he has a “degree in economics,” but his
university records indicate that although he completed some credits, he
truncated his studies before completing the requirements for any sort of
master’s degree. I also telephoned the university, in June, and spoke
with an administrator, who confirmed that Friberg does not have a degree
from Gothenburg University.)
Friberg worked until 2016 as the CEO of Wiking Mineral, a mining
company founded by Patrik Brinkmann, a Swedish businessman and far-right
political funder. He also has significant ties to the Sweden Democrats,
a nationalist, anti-immigration party. Erik Almqvist, a politician and
former Sweden Democrat, invested 600,000 kroner—nearly $75,000—in
Friberg’s Wiking Mineral, acquiring approximately 2.5 percent of the
company’s shares. He, like Friberg, has relocated to Budapest. Patrick
Ehn, once a prominent Sweden Democrat from Gothenberg, was kicked out of
the party for being too closely connected to neo-Nazis. This past
September, Arktos hired Ehn as its “Assistant Art Director.”
Friberg and Morgan formally connected soon after Morgan relocated to
India. Arktos absorbed ITP in 2009, and Friberg—who was named the CEO of
Arktos—joined Morgan in India in 2010.
Over the next three years, Arktos became the leading publisher of
translated and original materials of anti-democratic, anti-egalitarian
and anti-liberal writers. In that time, it had offices in several
locations in India, including Mumbai, Bengaluru and Goa.
Arktos has sought to avoid categorisation, claiming, on its website,
that its project is to “provide the resources for individuals of many
different inclinations to find alternatives to the onslaught of
modernity.” The publishing house has released books on topics such as
Hindu spiritualism and European paganism. Morgan has insisted that
Arktos is neither of the left nor the right, but moves beyond those
categories to intimate a deeper truth.
Friberg has always maintained that he is a publisher, not a
politician, concerned with “metapolitics” over party politics. In a book
he wrote called The Real Right Returns, Friberg explained,
“Metapolitics is the prerequisite of politics—the dynamic of power, as
it is manifested on the street and computer screen and up to the
government and parliament … In short, in all the channels which
communicate values perceived on an individual and collective level.”
Friberg and others of the alt-right hope to shift what they often refer
to as the “Overton window”—a concept of what type of discourse is
socially acceptable—to the right.
The account of how Morgan and Friberg ended up in India has changed
over the years. In a speech delivered in Stockholm in 2015, at the
“Identitarian Ideas” yearly conference funded by Friberg’s think tank
Motpol (which means “antithesis” in Swedish), Morgan said, “In the case
of India, where we were based for the first five years of our corporate
existence, the short answer is simply that we needed to be in a place
where we could afford to operate with the meagre funds we had at our
disposal in our early days. Although at the same time it was good to be
in a place where daily life is still for the most part an expression of
the traditional spirit rather than a liberal one.” THE COVER OF ARKTOS’S 2011 edition of The Arctic Home of the Vedas,
by Bal Gangadhar Tilak, shows a clear, rippling arctic sky against
jagged black mountain edges, which does little to suggest its content.
The book, first published in 1903, theorises that the North Pole was
home to an original Aryan race some 10,000 years ago. Tilak, dubbed the
“father of Indian unrest” for his advocacy of violent tactics against
British colonialists and inspiration to later Indian Hindu nationalists,
drew from Vedic hymns and Zoroastrian texts to support his theory.
The BJP and RSS have taken many cues from Tilak. For example, in 1939, the RSS leader MS Golwalkar, in his book We Or Our Nationhood Defined,
posited his own theory of Aryan racial origin. His view does not
challenge Tilak’s, in that it maintains that Aryans came from the North
Pole. But, Golwalkar added, at the time of the Aryans’ origin, the North
Pole was actually in India, located somewhere near Odisha and Bihar.
The book also reads Hindu texts as transmitting historical fact, and
says that India’s is the world’s most ancient civilisation.
Morgan and Friberg were inspired by Tilak’s Arctic theory as well,
although they interpreted it, and its implications, differently than
Golwalkar did. They chose Arktos’s name to evoke, according to Morgan,
“European tradition and ‘northernness.’” The term recalls the myth of an
Aryan arctic homeland now lost in snow and tundra—a genesis theory of
the white race as distinct from and superior to the rest of humanity. It
was briefly a popular intellectual curiosity in the early twentieth
century, and was later championed by Nazi esoterics and mystics.
Take, for example, Kristian “Varg” Vikernes, a Norwegian heavy-metal
musician whose books Arktos has sold. Vikernes believes that a superior
race came from Scandinavia, which he refers to as “Hyperborea.” His
book, according to Arktos’s web page, “explains the meaning of the
Norse-Germanic myths and elaborates on their importance today and their
impact on the Indo-European folksoul.” Convicted of burning several
churches in the 1990s in Norway, Vikernes explained his acts as paganist
revenge against Christianity. He also, in 1993, fatally stabbed a rival
musician 23 times. Arktos did mention his criminal record on its
website, but only barely, saying that Vikernes was “sentenced to prison
in the early 1990s in connection with his involvement with the black
metal scene”—which it defined as a subculture that, gently put, “carried
a rebellion against the mainstream.” Vikernes served 16 years in prison
and was arrested again in 2013 by French authorities on suspicion of
planning “a large terrorist act” after he was found with large weapons
stockpiles, and to have penned a letter to the convicted mass-murderer
Anders Breivik, chiding him for killing ethnic Norwegians instead of
going after Jews and foreigners. Arktos no longer sells Vikernes’s
books.
Vikernes identifies as an “Odinist,” a worshipper of the Nordic god
Odin. He rejects pan-Aryanism that includes South Asia, but there are
others who connect his Odinist worldview with Vedic texts, often citing
archaic, widely discredited race-science.
At his New Year’s party, Friberg asked me about my heritage.
“European, I guess. German, French. I’m not totally sure,” I responded.
The conversation quickly moved on to Aryan features, and suddenly
Friberg’s fingers were running against the back of my skull. He said he
was conducting a phrenological experiment, feeling for a ridge above my
neck, just at the base of my cranium. If I have that ridge, he said,
then I must be “Indo-European,” and therefore not a Jew. I passed the
test.
Arktos and Morgan are far from the first to have interests in both
right-wing political ideology and Eastern spirituality. Adolf Hitler’s
appropriation of the swastika as an Aryan symbol is one particularly
visible example, and many members of his core leadership had an affinity
for Eastern religions. Heinrich Himmler, who is generally regarded as
the architect of the Nazi party’s “final solution,” is perhaps the most
frequently cited such example; he was rumoured to have always carried a
copy of the Gita, calling it a “high Aryan canto.” He also formed the
SS-Ahnenerbe, a Nazi project tasked with finding polar evidence for the
origins of the Aryan race, echoing theories that Tilak proposed at the
turn of the century.
But as Blake Smith, a scholar of European orientalism, noted in the Los Angeles Review of Books,
the alt-right’s allusions to Hinduism are less inherited from the Third
Reich than they are from other esotericist thinkers sympathetic to
twentieth-century fascism and national socialism. These thinkers, Smith
argues, observed the Axis’s loss and came to view it as merely a battle
in a greater war—one that was being waged for the spirit of the world.
This idea was strongly championed by Savitri Devi and Julius Evola,
both of whom Arktos have prominently featured. Devi had little personal
experience within the Third Reich, though she venerated Hitler, and
considered him an avatar of Vishnu.
Devi first travelled to India in 1932, in search of a living pagan,
Aryan culture. A key figure in post-war Nazism, she connected with
high-level Nazi leaders in hiding, such as Otto Skorzeny and Hans-Ulrich
Rudel. Her works enjoyed numerous revivals by neo-Nazi publishers. In
1982, for a reprinted edition of her 1958 book The Lighting and the Sun,
the neo-Nazi publishing house Samisdat Publishers mailed out a notice,
reading: “THE HITLER CULT REVEALED. Discovered alive in India: Hitler’s
guru!”
“Decipher now the encoded workings of the Nazi mind,” the notice
read. “Perceive how Hitler saw the workings of the universe through:
Human sacrifice. Vegetarianism. Aryanism. The cyclic view of history.
The children of violence. The will to survive and to conquer. The seat
of truth. Gods on earth. Kalki, the avenger.”
Devi died soon after the notice was published, living out her last
days in an apartment on the outskirts of Delhi, surrounded by her cats.
Her book Impeachment of Man was reprinted in 1991 by the
far-right publishing house Noontide, run by the American
Holocaust-denier Willis Carto. Over two decades later, it is being sold
again by Arktos. Four of her works were republished between 2012 and
2013 by Counter-Currents, a white-nationalist outlet and publisher that
is partially based in Hungary. Excerpts from her books also appear on
the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi site whose name plays on that of the Nazi publication Der Stürmer. Devi’s ashes are interred in Wisconsin next to the body of George Lincoln Rockwell, an American Nazi Party leader.
According to Goodrick-Clarke’s book, Devi’s ideas were
“representative of a section of high-caste Brahmin that hated the Raj,”
and hoped for an alliance between India and Hitler in the struggle
against British imperial power. However, these ideas, “so foreign to the
actuality of National Socialism,” would likely fail to find support in
the West. Devi cited Tilak at length, and saw in India a paganism in
which dark-skinned Indians subordinated themselves to a strict caste
system, and light-skinned “Aryan” Brahmins ruled. Devi’s version of
Nazi-Aryan ideology, which attempted to transcend the parochialism of
German nationalism, gave the post-war far-right a struggle of “cosmic
significance,” Goodrick-Clarke wrote.
Devi’s periodic reintroduction to far-right literature points to a
recruitment tactic of enticing those whose primary concern is a disgust
and disillusionment with modernity rather than an adulation of Hitler or
a hatred of non-Aryans. Her invocation of Eastern religions as sources
of ancient wisdom, uncorrupted by a degenerate and alienating modernity,
appeals to many aspects of the New Age movement. And her elevation of
an “Indo-European” paganism that is neither uniquely Indian nor
European, but Aryan, is an appeal to those seeking a singular, prophetic
vision of history.
Arktos no longer sells books by Devi, although other publishing houses closely affiliated with Arktos do.
Arktos has also published five books by the Hindu godman Sri Sri Ravi
Shankar, whom it describes as a “humanitarian spiritual leader” whose
books “provide powerful tools to eliminate stress and improve
well-being.” Arktos’s website explains that “Sri Sri has rekindled the
traditions of yoga and meditation and has offered them in a form that
works in the 21st century.”
I emailed the godman’s company, the Art of Living, and received the
response: “Wanted to share that we have not published anything with
Arktos.” I responded with links to Sri Sri’s books’ listings on Arktos’s
website. A search on WorldCat—a comprehensive resource on published
books—also confirmed that Arktos has published the godman’s books. The
Art of Living did not respond.
Arktos has also published several other books related to Hinduism and India, such as Hare Krishna in the Modern World: Reflections by Distinguished Academics and Scholarly Devotees,
edited by Graham Dwyer and Richard J Cole, the “secretary of ISKCON’s
communication department” at Bhaktivedanta Manor, the largest ISKCON
centre in the United Kingdom. According to its website, but not any
public records, Arktos also published Return of the Swastika: Hate and Hysteria versus Hindu Sanity by Koenraad Elst, a book that, as reported in a 2008 piece in Outlook
magazine, was much appreciated by the BJP leader LK Advani for its
polemic against critiques of Hindu nationalism. Besides these, the books
Arktos at one point sold include the Gita, the Ramayana, the
Mahabharata, six books by ISKCON’s Prabhupada, and a book called Searching for Vedic India,
which, according to the description, “presents evidence that, contrary
to mainstream opinion, the Vedic civilization was a highly advanced
culture which encompassed the globe.”
The publishing house has also released The Saga of the Aryan Race,
written by Porus Homi Havewala, a technology professional and
“Zoroastrian Parsi native to Mumbai.” Arktos has also published books by
Steven J Rosen—“also known as Satyaraja Dasa,” according to Arktos’s
description—who wrote The Agni and the Ecstasy, a book of essays about Hinduism, and Jedi In The Lotus: Star Wars and the Hindu Tradition, “which discusses the many connections between the world of George Lucas’ Star Wars films and Hindu myth, history and metaphysics.”
But Arktos most consistently focusses on Julius Evola, who, like
Devi, finds the modern condition to be degenerate and hails Eastern
spiritualism as an antidote. In October 2017, Arktos launched a campaign
to raise enough funds to translate another five books of his into
English.
Little is known about Evola’s life, other than that he was born in
1898 in Rome, to an aristocratic Sicilian family, and that he was a
baron. In his writing, he argues that humanism and democracy are
deformations which transgress against a transcendental, perennial law.
His writings contain defences of both Italian fascism and German
national socialism, although he often noted that both were too
compromising in making populist appeals to the middle class.
Although Evola at times dismissed Nazism’s obsession with genetic
purity, these dismissals were shallow at best. He often sidestepped
biological racism by using phrases such as “aristocracy of the soul,”
superficially advocating a type of meritocracy, but, at the same time,
used the “caste system” as a means of explaining “natural law” and
hierarchy. In what is widely considered his magnum opus, Revolt Against the Modern World,
he wrote that, contrary to the belief that a caste system reproduces a
hierarchy that condemns each member of society to a predetermined fate,
“hierarchy was not a device of the human will but a law of nature.”
The caste system, for Evola, was not uniquely Indian, or even South
Asian at all. “The caste system is one of the main expressions of the
traditional sociopolitical order,” he wrote in a chapter called “The
Doctrine of the Castes” in Revolt. Caste, he held, is a feature
of all “traditional civilizations” of “Indo-Aryans.” In “the Hindu
civilization of historical times, we find a play of forms and meanings
that can be reduced respectively to the Aryan, boreal spirituality,” he
wrote. Evola, like Devi, envisioned an India in which whiteness placed
one within a natural, immutable hierarchy, where dark-skinned people
constituted a naturally servile class. “India,” as he saw it, was an
“Aryan India,” or the “Aryan East,” an entity separate from its
dark-skinned inhabitants.
European and American far-right political leaders, including Steve
Bannon, have cited Evola as well. In “An Establishment Conservative’s
Guide to the Alt-Right,” a piece published on Bannon’s outlet Breitbart
News, Evola is cited as one of the thinkers from whose ideas the
alt-right sprang. The piece was written by the infamous conservative
commentator Milo Yiannopoulos, and—as an exposé on Buzzfeed revealed
this October—was line-edited by some of the alt-right’s most openly
extremist elements.
Morgan and Arktos have borrowed enormously from Evola. Prior to 2017,
when Arktos’s advertisements began adopting the term “alt-right,” the
publisher avoided any clear label by which to define itself. But, as
Morgan said in Stockholm in 2015, if he had to pick a label for Arktos’s
political designation, “I would borrow the term ‘true right,’ which was
first coined by the Italian traditionalist philosopher Julius Evola,
who defined it as ‘those principles which were accepted and seen as
normal by every well-born person everywhere in the world prior to
1789’”—the start of the French Revolution.
Among Arktos’s fans, many seem to claim to have softer, more socially
acceptable reasons for supporting the publisher. I reached out to Phil
Reddall, who had “liked” posts about books by Tilak and Evola on
Arktos’s Facebook page, with questions about what drew him to them. “I
would like you to consider whether, despite great advances in
technology, we are happy in the west,” he replied to me over email.
Reddall also referred to consonances between different philosophies.
Hindus “refer to our present age as the Kali Yuga; an age of spiritual
and moral decline,” he said. “Northern Europeans use the term Wolf Age
to describe the same thing.” South Asian texts or religions, to Reddall,
seem to be divorced from the culture they were born from in place of a
mythical, non-historical past: “The Vedas are helpful to us as a part of
our study alongside other texts such as the Eddas,” he wrote, referring
to medieval Icelandic texts and the main sources of Norse mythology.
The interest in India for many of the readers and authors of Arktos’s
books seems to have little to do with South Asia and everything to do
with what Evola called the “Aryan East,” framing South Asian culture as
not anything of its own making, but rather an offshoot of a vast Aryan
racial civilisation.
The Kali Yuga, and other references from Hinduism, have also become
minor memes on the internet of the alt-right. Arktos has participated in
this as well, including in an advertisement for the publishing house
uploaded to Facebook that used the slogan “Preparing you for the end of
the Kali Yuga.” Some bloggers have even tried to explain the hierarchy
of the alt-right movement via the caste system. In one example, the
“Brahmins” of the alt-right are the “thought leaders,” a category which
includes people who work for publishers such as Arktos, the “Kshatriyas”
are the “faceless troll armies,” the “Vaishyas” are the “alt-lite”
(those who are typically anti-immigration but do not cross the line into
open racism or anti-Semitism), the “Shudras” are the “listeners,
readers” and finally the “Dalits” are the dreaded “untouchable
normies”—people who do not identify with the alt-right at all. IN A 78-PAGE SCREED called “A Normie’s Guide to the
Alt Right,” released on the Daily Stormer in August 2016, Andrew Anglin,
the site’s webmaster, wrote, “The Alt-Right views the struggle for the
continued existence of the White race as a global battle between Whites
and the Jews. The internet has allowed for us to connect globally with
as much ease as we can connect to someone down the street or in the next
room, and this has fostered a sense of worldwide unity of cause for
White people.”
Friberg and Morgan, however, have shown that this “worldwide unity”
does not merely play out online, in forums and chatrooms, but also in
real political partnerships between powerful players—including ones in
India.
According to a post on Arktos’s Facebook page, on 26 October 2013, a
“delegation” from Arktos, comprising Friberg and the former Swedish
politician Patrick Ehn, paid an official visit to the BJP’s Bengaluru
headquarters. Ehn had been ousted from the far-right Sweden Democrats
party just five months earlier, for his neo-Nazi connections, and was
now Arktos’s “director of marketing.”
In Bengaluru, they were greeted by Aravind Limbavali, the BJP’s
general secretary for Karnataka, who, according to the Karnataka BJP’s
website, has been an RSS worker for 35 years. The Facebook post said
that Friberg and Ehn were welcomed with “flowers and gifts,” and that
they discussed “possibilities for cooperation between traditionalist and
conservative movements in Europe and Asia, as well as potential
strategies to counter liberal globalist hegemony, and of course, future
book projects.”
Two months after meeting Limbavali, Friberg and Ehn travelled to
Delhi and, according to another Facebook post, from 18 December, had
“successful meetings” with Ram Madhav, who was then a spokesman for the
“grassroots Hindu nationalist organization RSS,” and Ravi Shankar
Prasad, who was then the deputy leader of the BJP. The post discusses
how the BJP is “expected by many analysts to take power in the coming
2014 national elections.”
In the years since they met leaders of Arktos, both Madhav and Prasad
have risen to some of the highest positions in the ruling government.
Madhav, now the BJP’s national general secretary, is one of the most
powerful members of the RSS due to his proximity to the prime
minister—he has been called Modi’s “ambassador at large,” and is widely
considered one of the most influential men in India. Prasad is a union
minister who holds two prestigious portfolios: law and justice, as well
as electronics and information technology.
On the same Delhi trip, the post claims, Arktos also “met with the
manager of the Voice of India, a Hindu nationalist publishing company,
with the purpose of negotiating new and exciting book contracts.” Voice
of India has frequently published Koenraad Elst as well as other “out of
India” migration theorists such as David Frawley. I called VOI and
spoke with its editor, Aditya Goel, who confirmed that VOI had met with
Arktos, but said that there was no follow-up or collaboration after the
meeting.
Friberg and Ehn also met with Sri Sri Ravi Shankar at his “Art of
Living” centre in Bengaluru. A photograph of Sri Sri welcoming them by
gifting them sashes is uploaded to a Facebook album on Friberg’s page
called “Bangalore 2013,” which also includes images of his room at Sri
Sri’s Art of Living ashram, where he wrote that he stayed for a few
days, and a visit that he made to an Art of Living-run school. Also
included is a photograph of the interior of a colonial-style restaurant,
which Friberg captioned: “Revisiting my favorite restaurant from last
year in Bangalore, a colonial style restaurant in the form of a train.
‘Here Sahibs and Memsahibs are still treated as royalty’”—“Sahibs” and
“Memsahibs” are colonial-era terms for white men and women. Friberg’s
caption continues: “‘At Sahib Sindh Sultan, very little has changed
since 1853.’ (I.e. everything is as it should be.)”
Just half a year after Arktos’s two documented meetings with
Hindu-nationalist politicians, the BJP, led by Narendra Modi, became
India’s ruling party, winning the May 2014 general election in a
landslide. Internationally, the rise of the BJP sparked concerns from
human-rights organisations in view of persistent questions about Modi’s
culpability in the state’s 2002 riots, classified by numerous scholars,
researchers and journalists as state-sponsored pogroms against Muslims.
More than 20,000 homes and businesses were damaged or destroyed in the
violence, leaving some 200,000 people displaced. Official numbers put
the death toll at around 1,000, while unofficial reports place it closer
to 2,000.
Modi, as Gujarat’s chief minister at the time, was widely implicated
in organising attacks on Muslims. Later, a sting operation by Tehelka magazine
further implicated high-level BJP and Gujarat government officials
working under Modi. In 2005, the United States went so far as to impose a
visa ban on Modi for his role in the riots, and high-ranking Western
officials would not meet with him for nearly a decade.
On the fifteenth anniversary of the Gujarat riots, this past March,
an RSS leader boasted: “You killed 56, we sent 2,000 to the graveyard.”
Meanwhile, Madhav has praised Modi for making a “riot-free India,”
despite ongoing religious tensions and violence throughout the nation.
Despite multiple phone calls and emails to the offices of Limbavali,
Madhav and Prasad, none responded to my request for comment on Arktos.
I emailed Morgan, Ehn and Friberg for comment as well. Morgan never
responded; Ehn said he would get back to me, though he never did; but
Friberg answered the specific questions I emailed him. When asked about
his two meetings with BJP politicians in India, Friberg said that those
meetings “are really just the tip of the iceberg. I met with over a
hundred different politicians, gurus, publishers, authors, journalists
and other influencers during my time in India.”
By the time the BJP came to power, Friberg and Morgan had both
relocated to Budapest. There, they have continued to meet with far-right
politicians, making connections with Hungary’s Jobbík, which is widely
recognised as a neo-Nazi party.
In fact, Arktos has orchestrated a meeting between far-right players
in India and Hungary. In Morgan’s 2015 speech in Stockholm, he stated,
“In 2013, while we were still in India, we facilitated a meeting between
representatives from Jobbík and the BJP.” Friberg, in his response to
my email, claimed that this was “not an accurate depiction of events,”
but did not offer further details. I emailed Marton Gyöngyösi, a leading
Jobbík politician who has met with Morgan and Friberg on multiple
occasions, and who is known internationally for his comments urging the
Hungarian government to “tally up people of Jewish ancestry” who live in
the country. When I asked him about the meeting with BJP politicians,
he responded, “As the meeting was informal, I do not wish to comment.”
But, he added, “as an opposition MP of a small country I would any time
gladly fly around the world to meet informally some influential MPs of
one of the largest countries of the worlds—especially if they are bound
to win the next elections.”
Jobbík, like the BJP, has its own history of complicity in violence
against minorities—in their case, often Jews and Roma. Although
Hungary’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, is not from Jobbík, he is also
from a right-wing party, and the country has proclaimed itself an
“illiberal state” under his rule, routinely engaging in a campaign of
xenophobia against refugees in the country, most of whom are Muslim.
Arktos was welcomed to Hungary with a tour of the country’s
parliament by the Jobbík leader Gabor Vona, and Vona also wrote the
introduction to Arktos’s edition of Evola’s A Handbook for Right-Wing Youth. Friberg
has also been photographed having a candlelit dinner with Gyöngyösi. In
interviews with me, both Arktos leaders and the politicians mentioned
have either dismissed or downplayed their relationships to each other as
unremarkable and unworthy of scrutiny, despite numerous examples of
collaboration and contact.
In August 2007, the Magyar Gárda, a paramilitary wing of Jobbík, was
founded. In the 18 months after that, over a dozen Roma homes were
burned with Molotov cocktails. In February 2009, a Roma man and his
four-year-old son were gunned down as they fled their firebombed home.
Two months later, a 54-year-old grandfather was shot on his doorstep as
he was on his way to his nearby factory job. Jobbík and the Gárda denied
involvement in the violence and deaths. The international European
Court of Human Rights found the Gárda to be illegal in 2009, but that
did not stop copycat groups from forming.
The question of violence is one that often elicits from Jobbík
leaders a stern look and disavowal, followed by an eliding grin and
reiterations of who the “true violent criminals” are, namely “gypsies”
(a racial slur for Roma) or “Jewish globalists.” In an official
statement after the evacuation of Gyöngyöspata, when neo-Nazi groups
widely thought to be connected to Jobbík held several Roma settlements
essentially under siege for three months, Jobbík said that the portrayal
of Roma “living in fear due to the aggressive attitude of the majority
population” was “misleading,” and continued on to say that “members of
the Gipsy minority are becoming more and more frequently responsible for
killing innocent, lonely elderly people in the countryside.”
Islamophobia, like racism, is also at the heart of the alt-right’s
ideology. This is most visible in its opportunistic treatment of the
recent “refugee crisis”—the influx of refugees, many of them Muslim,
into Europe from west Asia and Africa. Riding this wave of xenophobia,
many once-fringe groups, including Jobbík, have slithered out of
relative obscurity and into mainstream debates about immigration. “From
my point of view we’ve had a migrant crisis for 30 years,” Friberg said
to me when I interviewed him in January 2017. He went on to explain how
it was anti-immigrant prejudice that drew him into the alt-right in the
first place. “Being against immigration got me interested,” he said.
The BJP and RSS also often peddle anti-Islam ideology, portraying
Muslims as invaders and colonisers, and therefore illegitimate Indian
citizens. In RSS-supported historical revisionism, the Mughal dynasty,
which ruled India from 1526 until the arrival of the British
colonialists, is increasingly omitted from school textbooks, with the
justification that its leaders were tyrants or “invaders.”
“History is critical to the creation of an ideology,” Aditya
Mukherjee, a professor of history and social sciences at Jawaharlal
Nehru University, said when I interviewed him in December. The RSS and
other Hindu-nationalist players, he said, “want to project distorted
history in order to validate their current politics.”
Mukherjee also spoke about the connections between Hindu nationalism
and the types of Western ideologies being celebrated by the alt-right.
“The link between the BJP-RSS thought and the fascist thought that arose
in Europe is very similar,” he said. “It is an aggressive nationalism,
it is a homogenising nationalism, it is an identity-based nationalism.”
In his 2015 Stockholm speech, Morgan said, “If we are to defeat our
liberal globalist enemy, we ourselves must adopt an alternative form of
globalism, seeking alliances and common ground with individuals and
groups who share our desires everywhere, even outside of Europe. … The
narrow, ethnocentric viewpoint is a relic of the past. Only together, by
working with nationalists and traditionalists everywhere, can we
succeed. Toward this end, Arktos seeks to represent as many of these
facets of the struggle as possible, which is one reason why we have
published several books pertaining to the traditions of India, for
example.”
In a New Year’s Facebook post to their followers, rounding out 2013
and rolling into 2014, Arktos wrote that it “intends to become the
Indian Right’s gateway to the Western world.” This would be, they hoped,
“fruitful for our friends in India” and their friends worldwide. I ARRIVED AT Friberg’s apartment for his birthday
party in January 2017, several days after his New Year’s party. He
snickered when he opened the door. “Oh, it’s you,” he said. “I almost
forgot about you. Well, I’m glad the entertainment for the evening has
arrived.”
The party guests came from all over: France, Sweden, the United
States. Morgan was there, and next to him was Matt Forney, a notorious
misogynist and white-nationalist who had built a modest following online
by writing articles with headlines such as “How to Beat Your Girlfriend
or Wife and Get Away With It,” or “The Case Against Female
Self-Esteem.” Under a pseudonym, in an essay titled “The Necessity of
Domestic Violence,” he wrote that women “should be terrorized by their
men; it’s the only thing that makes them behave better than chimps.”
That night, Forney recounted a story about taunting a homeless black
man in Chicago, pulling out a five-dollar bill and throwing it on the
subway train tracks, only to laugh at the expression of humiliation and
desperation on the man’s face. Morgan laughed along at this anecdote.
At this point, recently relocated from Chicago, Forney had only been in Hungary for three days, but had long-term plans to stay.
“What do you think of Hungary so far?” I asked, changing the subject.
“Oh I love it. No kikes, spics or dindus,” Forney responded, using
slurs to refer to Jews and Latinos. I did not recognise the last word.
“What’s a dindu?”
Forney and Morgan exchanged a glance and laughed. “It’s another word for ‘nigger,’” Morgan explained.
“Yeah, like ‘didn’t do nuffin,’” Forney clarified.
“Why not just say ‘nigger,’ then?”
Forney seemed to fumble and he and Morgan exchanged glances. “More polite in mixed company, I guess.”
Throughout the evening, Friberg kept pulling me aside or interrupting
my conversations to relay commands to me. When his friend spilled a
drink on my hand, Friberg told his friend to pat my breasts as the drink
must have spilled there as well. The hors d’oeuvres for the evening
were slices of brie wrapped in prosciutto. “Eat ten of those! Prove
you’re not a Jew,” he told me.
Tor Westman, Arktos’s marketing director, reassured me, “Don’t worry,
we already all think you’re a Jew,” citing my German last name and
saying that “real Germans all changed their names when they went to
America.”
At one point, Friberg pulled me down by my shoulder to sit next to
him on the couch. A music video by Emily Youcis, a young woman who was a
well-known food vendor at a baseball stadium in Philadelphia, but who
was fired for her white-nationalist politics, was playing. It was a
cover of the classic song “Somewhere Over the Rainbow,” with a far-right
twist.
Somewhere, over the rainbow, way up high There’s a Reich that I’ve heard of Once in a lullaby…
“This is a real independent woman for you to admire,” Friberg said to
me. He grasped the back of my neck to turn my head towards the
television. “Pay attention.”
Somewhere, over the rainbow There’s no Jews…
As I squirmed under his grip, his fingers touched the back of my skull, this time not looking for a ridge to confirm my race.
Someday I’ll wish upon the sun And wake up when the race war’s done Sieg Heil-ing…
“Stop,” I said, pulling away. His grip tightened. I repeated the word
louder, and then yelled it. In response, Friberg tugged my hair so hard
that I screamed in pain.
Hitler flew over the rainbow, Why, oh, why can’t I?
The room looked over, and Friberg laughed. I excused myself to the restroom, and soon attempted to make a polite exit.
Markus, a red-haired Swede, eyed me as I was trying to leave. “Are you triggered?” he asked.
My blood finally boiled. “Fuck you,” I snarled.
He stared back at me with simmering hatred. “What are you going to do, are you going to cry?”
Enraged, I lifted the corners of the coffee table he was sitting at,
but held back enough to not flip it over. Some long-stemmed candles fell
on the carpet.
Friberg came over to me to tell me that I was overreacting. I asked
him why he hurt me. “Will you cry rape?” he asked. “It was only a joke, I
only did it lightly.”
“Oh!” I laughed. “Then I should play along?” I reached up to his gelled hair and yanked hard.
He called me a “deranged liberal bitch” and ordered me out of his apartment.
Friberg followed up with articles and podcast commentary about the
events of that evening, with the help of Matt Forney, who said that I
“nearly start[ed] a fire and [left] burn marks on an $800 rug.” In the
blog post Friberg wrote following the report I published in The Atlantic,
he repeated those claims, saying that I “almost set fire” to his
apartment. But in a response to a commenter who asked Friberg why he did
not choose to press charges, he stated that the damage was little more
than “a few burn marks on the carpet.”
Several comments on Friberg’s blog post about me, however, criticised
him for being too “defensive” on the question of his extremism. “The
Atlantic is obsessed with the alt right and they’ve given us a lot of
coverage,” one commenter wrote. “In addition so far every article
they’ve written on the movement seemed quite favorable to anyone who
isn’t weighed down by words like ‘racist’ and ‘bigot.’” Another person
wrote, “The Alt Right is most certainly extremist. Who tf is Daniel
Frieberg and why does he sound like a scared rabbit when he gets called a
Nazi?” THE DHARMA MANIFESTO, a 2013 publication,
is one potent example of a book that Arktos has published that uses
Hindu ideas and symbols to riff on themes popular among the alt-right.
Written by a white American man named Frank Morales, who goes by the
Sanskrit name “Sri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya,” and sometimes refers to
himself as “Acharya-ji,” the book proposes a nationalism built on the
concept of dharma, which Morales calls “dharma nationalism.”
The book is legion in inconsistency and contradiction. Morales
praises the values of the American Revolution, but rejects the European
Enlightenment that bore it. He wants limited government, but draconian
punishment for “crime,” especially “treason against the nation.” He
yearns for meritocracy and the valuation of women, yet disdains
“neo-Hindu obsessions with eliminating ‘caste’” and “eliminating sati,”
the custom of widows immolating themselves on their husband’s funeral
pyres. He argues for distinct nations’ right to self-governance, yet
envisions a global dictatorial suprastructure based on a singular and
immutable “dharma.”
But there is one sentiment that remains consistent throughout the
text—despair at the supposed decay of American culture. In a chapter
titled “The Crisis of Modernity,” for example, he writes:
Despite [America] being the wealthiest and arguably most
powerful nation the world has ever known … it is now an undebatable fact
that our culture has been purposefully and systematically infested with
degeneracy, moral ugliness and a trash-laden culture by a secretive
cabal of powerful elites who control our nation (and much of the world)
from behind the scenes. We are in a crisis.
“Dharma nationalism” is not a widely referenced concept in the
alt-right. It does not appear in memes or blog posts beyond the
author’s. There are no copies of the book available in any university or
public library, according to WorldCat’s records. Morales has appeared
in interviews with white nationalists, including with Robert Stark of
Counter-Currents, but beyond that, he and his work remain obscure.
Still, his view of the world in a crisis of rot, marionetted by a
cabalistic elite (a thinly veiled anti-Jewish jibe), and the promise of
an imminent rectifying cataclysm is engraved into the alt-right.
In a YouTube interview on 19 March 2017, the author claims that he is
“close to people who are close” to Donald Trump, and that several of
the president’s advisors own a copy of The Dharma Manifesto.
“If you look at the policy section of my book, and precisely what it is
that Trump is doing, they are practically synonymous. … That is not 100
percent by accident,” he said. “That was done by design.”
Amid lengthy quotes from Morales’s book and other promotional material, the Facebook page for The Dharma Manifesto
is essentially a fan site to various European and American far-right
leaders. It includes posts about the leader of France’s National Front,
Marine Le Pen; Frauke Petry of Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland;
Nigel Farage of the UK Independence Party; and, of course, Donald Trump.
Morales endorsed the accused paedophile Roy Moore in a recent
contentious battle for an Alabama Senate seat. In a Facebook album
titled “Leaders of the Resistance,” he praised Modi as well as Yogi
Adityanath, the BJP chief minister of Uttar Pradesh and leader of the
far-right Hindu Yuva Vahini.
Born in New York City to Catholic parents and raised in Brooklyn,
Morales has said in multiple interviews that he began reading the Gita
when he was ten years old. He was ordained in India as an orthodox Vedic
brahmana in 1986, and earned a PhD from the University of
Wisconsin-Madison in 2002. He had a brief and unremarkable stint as an
adjunct academic, and eventually left to teach Hinduism, or, as he
prefers to refer to it, Sanatana Dharma.
He was the leading scholar of a Hindu temple in Omaha, Nebraska, from
2007 through 2009. His departure from the temple is shrouded in
mystery. I called both priests of the temple, as well as the temple
leader, and each declined to comment on why and how he left. Morales now
runs the International Sanatana Dharma Society in Omaha, which, on its
website, claims to be a “global spiritual movement dedicated to
practicing and teaching the ancient Vedic religious tradition in its
fully authentic and unaltered form.”
Morales declares that his “dharma nationalism” is not a reiteration
of the “Hindu nationalism” of the BJP and the RSS. But his only apparent
gripe with Hindutva is reminiscent of Evola’s disparaging critiques of
German Nazism and Italian fascism—Morales argues in his book that
Hindutva is too compromising in its appeals to “Muslims, Christians,
pseudo-secularists, and other non-Hindu Indians by merely presenting
themselves as patriotic Indians.” This is why, he theorises, the BJP
lost the general election in 2004. The Dharma Manifesto was,
however, published before the BJP won in 2014, so his views on the party
may have since changed. I reached out to Morales to request an
interview several times, via Facebook, his website, and even through
some of his devotees, but he never responded.
Often, Morales’s writings and speeches drift into strange territory.
In one of his more popular YouTube videos, with over 85,000 views,
called “Ancient Vedic Aliens,” Morales explains that UFOs are literal
manifestations of beings from “hellish” and “heavenly” realms. Nordics,
he says, are examples of “heavenly” aliens. “You’ve heard of Nordic
aliens,” he casually says. “The Nordics are human beings but they are
definitely more advanced than us, both spiritually but also
technologically in the good sense. They’re almost between us and the devas.”
His writings have, according to his website, attracted the attention
of a number of high-profile Hindu leaders. He posed for pictures with
the outspoken BJP politician Subramanian Swamy at a “Hindu Unity Day”
celebration in New York City. According to Morales’s website, the
prominent alternative-medicine advocate Deepak Chopra has said his work
is “phenomenal,” and that it teaches “the pure essence of Yoga.” The
website also cites accolades from the writer Rajiv Malhotra, who
apparently praised Morales as a “great public champion of Hinduism.”
Both Morales and Malhotra have been cited together as critics of
“radical universalism”—an idea, which they describe as a Hindu one, that
all religions are similar paths to the ultimate goal of realising
divine potential. Malhotra has built his career around attacking Hindu
progressives as colonial imposters. Modi himself has reportedly praised
Malhotra as “glorifying our priceless heritage.” A piece on Scroll
refers to him as “the philosopher-in-chief of Internet Hindutva”—a
leader to “swarms of angry right-wing bloggers, chat-room lurkers and
Twitter trolls.”
I reached out to Swamy, Chopra and Malhotra to ask them about their
supposed interactions with Morales, but none of them responded to my
requests for comment. The Dharma Manifesto also includes critiques of Christianity
in a larger polemic against “Abrahamic religions,” but is far less
critical of Christianity than Islam. “Islam is an alien, inherently
oppressive, violent and hateful religious ideology,” Morales writes.
“The amount of destruction wrought upon so many hundreds of Dharmic
cultures that was experienced at the hands of Islam, ranging from the
Middle East and Persia to India and Indonesia, boggles human
comprehension.” He is equally critical of Judaism and Marxism—which he
includes as an Abrahamic religion, as it is “the antithesis of Dharmic
law.” (This is, again, another instance of anti-Jewish prejudice, as he
closely associates Marxism with Jews.)
Morales rejects the term “Hinduism” in favor of “Vedism,” which he
argues more accurately reflects his interpretation of Hinduism as being a
branch of European paganism. “Vedic culture and the pre-Christian
European religions are not merely spiritual cousins; they are one and
the same worldview,” he said in an interview with Counter-Currents. This
European paganism, according to Morales, includes Odinism—like that of
Varg Vikernes—as well as Celtic and Slavic pantheisms.
Morales’s view that modern, Western life is degenerate gives way, as
much of Arktos’s literature does, to expectations for an end of days. In
this way, even for those on the alt-right who do not identify as
closely with Hinduism as Morales does, the Kali Yuga and its end
function as ancient signifiers of what the alt-right sees as a society
in which white power, in a shifting and increasingly global world, is
threatened. As Morgan said in the 2014 interview for the Journal for the Study of Radicalism,
“there’s a lot of talk in our circles about what is usually termed ‘the
collapse.’ A lot of people are talking about this on the Left as well.
It’s the idea that this civilization we have now, and especially
American society, is unsustainable in the long term, and that sometime
in the not-too-distant future, it’s all going to come to a head and fall
apart.”
Blake Smith, in the Los Angeles Review of Books, argues that
the idea of the Kali Yuga anchors “the alt-right in a historical
movement that extends beyond the Third Reich, whose collapse remains a
troubling explanandum for neo-Nazi movements … Citing the Manusmriti or the Puranas
suggests that by attacking ‘degeneracy,’ the alt-right speaks for a
millennia-old moral consensus shared by many societies and only recently
perverted in our own.”
In a short video released on his Facebook page the day after Trump’s
inauguration, Morales preaches that 2017 will be “the beginning of the
golden age.” But, he adds, “there are two distinct routes that the world
can now take. One, in which the forces of evil simply relinquish and
surrender. Or one, in which they make the very stupid mistake of trying
to retain power. If they do the latter, 2017 has the potential to be one
of, if not the most, violent years in history, going back to the
Mahabharata war.”
He pauses, then continues. “It’s still the beginning of the golden age. Because the forces of good will win.” THE RUSSIAN PHILOSOPHER Alexander Dugin is one of
Arktos’s most popular writers. Arktos’s 2012 publication of a
translation of Dugin was the first of his full texts to be translated
into English.
Dugin is also an influential political figure, although the extent of
his power is widely debated among Russianists. Nevertheless, his
connections with nearly every European far-right political party and
extremist group seem to have opened up strategic corridors for Arktos.
Variously cited as “Putin’s Brain” and “Putin’s Rasputin,” Dugin has
been credited with being a leading ideological force in the Kremlin as
Putin’s former “geopolitical advisor.” Dugin, too, is an intellectual
heir of Evola (whom he has translated into Russian) and the French New
Right, also widely published by Arktos. He has reportedly called for a
“genuine, true, radically revolutionary, and consistently fascist
fascism,” and seeks to “hasten the ‘end of times’ with all out war.” As
the first provider of Dugin texts in English, Arktos is patient zero for
the spread of these ideas across Europe and beyond.
Dugin regularly interacts with Friberg and Morgan on social media,
and visited them several times in India. On one of these trips, in Delhi
in February 2012, Dugin gave an interview to Morgan and Friberg, now
hosted on Counter-Currents. In it, he said, “we must create strategic
alliances to overthrow the present order of things, of which the core
could be described as human rights, anti-hierarchy, and political
correctness—everything that is the face of the Beast, the anti-Christ
or, in other terms, Kali Yuga.”
Credited as a central figure in the rise of several European
far-right groups, Dugin influences political parties such as Germany’s
National Democratic Party, the British National Party, Greece’s Golden
Dawn, Hungary’s Jobbík and France’s National Front. His reach has
arguably been perceptible in the White House as well, through Bannon,
who was widely perceived to be Trump’s very own Dugin. Bannon has
portrayed Putin as championing both nationalism and conservative
cultural values. Reciprocally, Dugin has said that he is Bannon’s
“ideological ally.”
In Dugin’s geopolitical vision, Western liberalism has attempted to
colonise and subordinate the globe, bending white nations to its will
through a campaign of sabotage against ethnic tradition via
“multiculturalism.” This liberalism, to Dugin, is a destructive force
that will render the white race obsolete. This is a key tenet of
white-nationalism—that whites must prevent their own racial dissolution
wrought by interracial societies, for fear of genetic “pollution,” or
“white genocide.”
Some believe Arktos is part of a larger covert geopolitical strategy
by Russia. In January 2017, I met Andras Dezsö, a national-security and
organised-crime reporter for the Hungarian digital-news site Index.hu,
at his office on the outskirts of Budapest. He is a specialist on
Russian connections to far-right organisations. Dezsö described Arktos
and its “metapolitical” project as an example of “active measures,” or aktivniye meropriyatiye.
A KGB tactic of disinformation and Cold War psychological warfare,
“active measures” were designed to subvert “Western community alliances
of all sorts … and thus to prepare ground in case the war really
occurs,” according to the retired KGB General Oleg Kalugin. Researchers
have argued that some of the most famous Cold War conspiracy theories,
from John F Kennedy’s assassination as an inside government job to AIDS
as a CIA invention, were planted by Soviets in accordance with this
tactic. (Dezsö did not cite any specific evidence of the Kremlin’s
involvement in Arktos, however. And, even if the publisher is an
instance of Russian active measures, its fan base, along with the rest
of the alt-right, seems to largely be comprised of genuine supporters.)
The term “active measures” has been resurrected from Cold War
vocabulary in the wake of Trump’s victory, to describe cultural
subversion in the form of fake news and disinformation campaigns amid
allegations of collusion between the Trump election team and Russia. It
has made its way into several government public hearings, including the
fallen FBI director James Comey’s testimony, in which he described
Russia’s influence in the 2016 US election as a part of “active
measures.”
Dezsö said that Arktos’s prior location in India only provided more
proof that Russia is executing active measures through it. Third
countries are often used, he said, as a diversionary tactic and a means
of weakening any claims of covert Russian operations. He pointed out
that India was a centre for Russian intelligence services in the 1970s
and 1980s.
Now, Dezsö said, Eastern European countries such as Hungary are
becoming these third countries of covert activity. “Friberg can do
freely what he wants to do here, and active measures get a green light,”
he said. Arktos and its friends, he continued, “are dangerous, because
it’s a cultural war, also.”
Dezsö continued, “I think the superpowers and the powers that think
about war, they think about arms and bombs, but it’s a very, very
important field, the cultural field.” He added: “There is already a war,
and the soldiers are guys like Friberg.” FRIBERG AND MORGAN are both still in Hungary. But
Morgan left Arktos in March 2017, due to a personal split with Friberg.
In retaliatory blog posts in June 2017, Friberg accused Morgan of
attempting a coup in the company, and Morgan accused Friberg of
embezzlement. Friberg’s post called ISKCON a cult, “famous around the
world for its panhandling and hokey moralizing,” and mocked Morgan’s
involvement with it, along with that of Patrick Boch—the former employee
of Arktos who is still a Hare Krishna devotee. Friberg also added that
Boch is married “to a woman of dark complexion” in India. Morgan is now
an editor for Counter-Currents.
Friberg remains the CEO of Arktos and a partner in the Alt-Right Corporation, alongside Richard Spencer. Friberg flew from Europe specifically to attend the Charlottesville rally this past August.
Recently, Arktos has claimed that it is expanding. In September, its
website announced several new hires to account for a growing influx of
manuscripts.
Arktos has also bragged about its connections to the White House.
Jason Jorjani, a co-founder of the Alt-Right Corporation, along with
Friberg and Spencer, was caught on video claiming that Steve Bannon was
to be the interface between the Alt-Right Corporation and Donald Trump.
(Jorjani has since left Arktos and the Alt-Right Corporation.)
Of course, none of the fascination with the implications of Hindu
spirituality has stopped far-right violence against Indians in the
United States. Indeed, the contempt Friberg expressed for Hare Krishnas
and Boch’s wife is much more representative of the sentiments of most
racist Americans.
Nevertheless, Trump has made overtures to the Hindu American
community. At a Bollywood-themed benefit concert for “victims of terror”
a few months before the election, he spoke to a crowd of “Hindus for
Trump” in Edison, New Jersey. Posters for the event showed Trump sitting
in a red-white-and-blue lotus, holding a yoga pose, and flyers showed a
demonic Hillary Clinton and Sonia Gandhi rallying to “Get Modi!” and
frame him for the Gujarat riots. The highlight of the evening was a
performance in which Indian dancers were attacked by terrorists on
stage. They were saved by the US Army, after which they held their hands
over their hearts during the American national anthem, followed by
Bruce Springsteen’s song “Born in the USA.” Trump later came on stage to
proclaim “I am a big fan of Hindu,” and that the United States and
India would be “best friends” if he were elected.
Yet, just weeks after Trump’s inauguration, in early February, an
Indian man in Colorado awoke to find his house defaced with faeces and
racist slogans. Two weeks later, in Kansas, a white man shot two Indian
men, Srinivas Kuchibhotla and Alok Madasani, killing Kuchibhotla. The
shooter reportedly yelled “Get out of my country!” before firing. Trump
only addressed the death a week later to comment on “the divisiveness in
our country.”
All the while, the alt-right, on its message boards and its blogs, has continued to eagerly await the end of the Kali Yuga.
Carol Schaeffer
is an independent writer and journalist covering the rise of the
far-right around the globe. She has been based in New York, Belgrade,
London and Paris, and can be found on Twitter as @ThenCarolSaid.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, right, at the swearing-in of Yogi Adityanath, center. Credit Sanjay Kanojia/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Since he was elected in 2014, Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India has played a cagey game, appeasing his party’s hard-line Hindu base while promoting secular goals of development and economic growth. Despite worrying signs that he was willing to humor Hindu extremists, Mr. Modi refrained from overtly approving violence against the nation’s Muslim minority.
On Sunday, Mr. Modi revealed his hand. Emboldened by a landslide victory in recent elections in India’s largest state, Uttar Pradesh, his party named a firebrand Hindu cleric, Yogi Adityanath, as the state’s leader. The move is a shocking rebuke to religious minorities, and a sign that cold political calculations ahead of national elections in 2019 have led Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party to believe that nothing stands in the way of realizing its long-held dream of transforming a secular republic into a Hindu state.
Mr. Adityanath has made a political career of demonizing Muslims, thundering against such imaginary plots as “love jihad”: the notion that Muslim men connive to water down the overwhelming Hindu majority by seducing Hindu women. He defended a Hindu mob that murdered a Muslim man in 2015 on the suspicion that his family was eating beef, and said Muslims who balked at performing a yoga salutation to the sun should “drown themselves in the sea.”
Uttar Pradesh, home to more than 200 million people, badly needs development, not ideological showmanship. The state has the highest infant mortality rate in the country. Nearly half of its children are stunted. Educational outcomes are dismal. Youth unemployment is high.
Mr. Adityanath has sounded the right notes, saying, “My government will be for everyone, not specifically for any caste or community,” and promising to make Uttar Pradesh “the dreamland” of Mr. Modi’s development model.
But the appointment shows that Mr. Modi sees no contradiction between economic development and a muscular Hindu nationalism that feeds on stoking anti-Muslim passions. Mr. Modi’s economic policies have delivered growth, but not jobs. India needs to generate a million new jobs every month to meet employment demand. Should Mr. Adityanath fail to deliver, there is every fear that he — and Mr. Modi’s party — will resort to deadly Muslim-baiting to stay in power, turning Mr. Modi’s dreamland into a nightmare for India’s minorities, and threatening the progress that Mr. Modi has promised to all of its citizens.
A version of this editorial appears in print on March 23, 2017, on Page A24 of the New York edition with the headline: A Perilous Embrace of Extremism in India.
The acquittal of former RSS member Asseemanand and six others on
Wednesday in the 2007 Ajmer dargah blasts has returned focus to Hindu
right-wing terror cases.
The National Investigation Agency (NIA)
was in charge of probing seven such cases, three of which have concluded
at the trail court level. Here’s a status check by HT: Malegaon blasts (2006)
Four blasts took place outside a mosque in Malegaon in September 2006, killing 38 people.
(HT file photo)
CASE: Four explosions took place outside a mosque on September 8, 2006, killing 38 people.
PROBE:
The Maharashtra ATS and CBI chargesheeted nine Muslims. The NIA, which
took over the case in 2011, filed another chargesheet naming four
alleged Hindu extremists. The special court hearing the case discharged
all the Muslim accused arrested by state ATS.
STATUS: Trial yet to begin. Samjhauta Express blasts (2007)
Powerful
bombs ripped through two compartments of the Samjhauta Express train,
the rail link between India and Pakistan, during the intervening night
of February 18 and 19, killing 68 people.
(HT file photo)
CASE: Explosions occurred near Dewana
railway station in Haryana’s Panipat district, killing 68 people, mostly
from Pakistan, on the night of February 18. The train was on its way to
Lahore from Delhi.
PROBE: The NIA has filed chargesheet against eight people, of whom one is dead and two are at large.
STATUS: Trial is on. Hyderabad Mecca Masjid blast (2007)
CASE: A powerful IED blast in Hyderabad’s Mecca Masjid area of Hyderabad on May 18, killed 14 people.
PROBE:
The Hyderabad police rounded up dozens of Muslims but could not get any
breakthrough.The case was then handed over to the CBI, which arrested
Aseemanad, an accused in the Samjhauta train blasts case also. The first
chargesheet was filed by the CBI, then the case was handed over to the
NIA.
STATUS: Trial is on.
Ajmer dargah blast (2007)
CASE:
A tiffin bomb exploded on October 11 during Ramzan at the Khwaja
Moinuddin Chishti Dargah in Ajmer, killing three people and injuring 12.
Later, three more bombs were recovered from the premises.
PROBE: Of 13 accused, three are absconding and one -- Sunil Joshi -- is dead.
STATUS:
A Jaipur court on March 8 convicted three persons -- Joshi, Devendra
Gupta and Bhavesh Patel -- but let off former RSS member Aseemanand and
six others. Sunil Joshi murder (2007)
CASE:
Sunil Joshi, the leader of an alleged Hindu extremist group believed to
be behind most of the right-wing Hindu terror cases, was shot dead on
December 29, 2007 when he was walking back to his hideout at Chuna
Khadan locality in Dewas, Madhya Pradesh. The group included Pragya
Singh Thakur, Lokesh Sharma, Sandeep Dange, Ramji Kalsangra, Rajendra
Pehelwan, Dhan Singh, Amit Chauhan and Aseemanand.
PROBE: After
completing the investigation, the NIA handed over the case to the Madhya
Pradesh police saying it had not found any evidence to suggest that his
murder was linked to the larger Hindu terror conspiracy. The agency
alleged that Joshi was killed by his own men as they were unhappy over
his ‘misbehaviour’ with Pragya Singh Thakur.
STATUS: Trial ended on February 1, 2017. All eight accused, including Pragya Singh Thakur, acquitted. Malegaon and Modasa blasts (2008)
A blast in Malegaon in September 2008 killed six persons.
(HT file photo)
CASE: Twin explosions took place in Malegaon
(Maharashtra) and Modasa (Gujarat) on September 29. Improvised
explosive devices (IEDs) mounted on motorcycles were planted at both
locations, killing a total of eight persons.
PROBE: The
Maharashtra ATS claimed to crack the Malegaon case. Pragya Singh Thakur,
along with a serving army official, Prasad Srikant Purohit were
arrested and chargesheeted in the case.
STATUS: The NIA dropped
charges against Pragya Singh Thakur and the special court is yet to take
a call on it. The Modasa blast case was closed by the NIA citing lack
of evidence.
Writings of French Hindu who worshipped Hitler as an avatar of Vishnu are inspiring the US alt-right
Savitri Devi was born Maximiani Portaz in 1905.
Image credit:
YouTube grab
South
Asian religious traditions have long attracted admirers from the West,
but none have been as flamboyant or as dangerous as Maximiani Portaz
(1905-1982). This French convert to Hinduism believed that Hitler had
been an avatar of Vishnu sent to prepare for the end of the Kali Yuga –
the last of the four stages the world goes through according to Hindu
scriptures. Her ideas, known as Esoteric Hitlerism, are now making a
surprising comeback on the internet.
Before becoming a far-right
mystic, Portaz was on track for a brilliant academic career. She earned a
master’s degree in chemistry and a doctorate in the philosophy of
mathematics, but underwent a spiritual crisis at the end of her studies.
She abandoned academic life, renounced her French citizenship, and
became fascinated by the rising Nazi Party in Germany. The Nazis held
that the Aryan race was the basis of all civilisation, so Portaz went to
India in 1932 to discover the supposed Aryan homeland for herself. She
fell in love with India. Changing her name to Savitri Devi, she
converted to Hinduism, married the nationalist activist Asit Krishna
Mukherji, and dedicated herself to freeing the subcontinent from both
British imperialism and Christianity, which she condemned as an
anti-Aryan faith.
Esoteric Hitlerism
As
a Nazi sympathizer and supporter of Indian nationalism, Devi saw the
outbreak of World War II in 1939 as a golden opportunity. After an
unsatisfying meeting with Mahatma Gandhi in the fall of 1941, Devi and
her husband embraced Subhas Chandra Bose. They were instrumental in
setting up his first meetings with the Japanese government. Devi was so
committed to the Third Reich that she continued to fight for it even
after its defeat in 1945. She returned to Europe, distributing pro-Nazi
propaganda in the ruins of German cities. She was arrested, and after a
few years in prison, passed the rest of her life between France and
India.
As she reflected on the war during her imprisonment, Devi
decided that the Nazis had been fighting not for mere political power,
but for a spiritual ideal that few had understood. Combining Nazi
ideology with elements of Hindu theology, she began publishing numerous
books that claimed to reveal the hidden message of the Nazi cause.
Hitler, she claimed, was no mere mortal: he was an avatar of Vishnu,
sent to clear the way for Kalki, Vishnu’s final avatar, who will end the
Kali Yuga and renew the cosmic cycle. Hitler’s apparent defeat in the
political realm, then, had been in fact a spiritual victory hastening
the salvation of the universe.
Toward the end of her life, Devi
became interested in the United States, seeing it as fertile ground for
her doctrine. She is even buried in Virginia, next to the grave of
prominent American neo-Nazi George Lincoln Rockwell. And, just as she
predicted, America has begun to welcome Devi’s teaching. After years of
being relegated to the fringes of far-right occultism, her writings have
re-emerged in recent years as an inspiration to the alt-right, a new
movement of fascists and white nationalists based in North America.
Rising to the attention of the mainstream media in the wake of the Trump
campaign, the alt-right combines an ironic, playful style with an
appeal to spiritual ideals.
The alt-right spin
One
of the most important thinkers on the alt-right, Greg Johnson, has
spent the last several years promoting Devi’s ideas through his
web-journal Counter-Currents and associated publishing house.
Johnson holds that Esoteric Hitlerism is a form of spirituality designed
for white people, an Indo-European religion emphasising violence, power
and virility. Johnson also suggests that Devi’s faith solves a critical
problem for neo-Nazi movements: the fact that fascism seems to have
failed so utterly, and caused so much horrible suffering. If, as Devi
claimed, Hitler was not a failed leader but a successful herald of a new
golden age, then fascism may be able to rise again.
While Counter-Currents publishes high-brow articles on Esoteric Hitlerism, other leading alt-right sites such as TheRightStuff.biz reach
a broad audience by promoting Esoteric Kekism, a parody religion based
on Devi’s work, centered on semi-ironic memes of Hitler and Vishnu.
These images play for laughs (the word “kek” means “lol”), but, like
other popular memes showing Donald Trump as a God-Emperor, are far more
than silly humor. They use Devi’s ideas to steadily break down taboos
about Hitler, making Nazism seem more acceptable to conservatives raised
to think of the Third Reich as a symbol of evil. Perhaps, just as Devi
was right that the United States would one day accept her ideas, she
might also have been right that the end of the Third Reich was just the
beginning for fascism.
Full Text (PDF)Book review: Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik and Brigitte Mral (eds), Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and DiscourseDiscourse & Society July 2015 26: 503-505,
Audio Recording: Fehmida Riaz’s Poem ’Tum Bilkul Haum Jaisay Nilay’ [You have turned out just like us]
The Pakistani feminist poet Fehmida Riaz through this wonderful poem in Hindustani suggests how India with its Hindutva religious right on the upswing is turning up to be on the same road as Pakistan. http://www.sacw.net/article8237.html