|
Showing posts with label Malegaon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Malegaon. Show all posts

May 12, 2019

‘The girl in the sky blue dress? She is dead’

The Indian Express, May 12, 2019

‘The girl in the sky blue dress? She is dead’

On Sept 29, 2008, Farheen stepped out to buy tikkis. Minutes later, a blast went off at Malegaon’s Bhikku Chowk, killing seven people, among them the 10-year-old. The story of the girl who loved taking strolls with her father, wearing bangles and dupattas and who “flew away like a bird”



Written by Smita Nair

malegaon blast 2008, malegaon blast 2008 victims, malegaon blast 2008 victim parents, pragya thakur, sadhvi pragya thakur, malegaon blast pragya thakur, pragya thakur elections, pragya thakur polls, indian express news
Farheen’s photo that stays tucked in her father’s pocket.
FARHEEN is a 2×2 inch studio portrait. Tucked away inside a booklet in her father’s shirt pocket, she only comes out on days when investigators or journalists knock on his door. There is more of her, in a metal trunk. Mostly otherwise, she is a memory.
Advertising
On the afternoon of September 29, 2008, Farheen was the happiest.. After weeks of trying, she had finally learnt to string together four words and make a sentence — her first in English. After three incorrect attempts at spelling ‘hi’ as ‘high’, she had proceeded to write a full sentence in her notebook. Neat, bold words, separated by irregular gaps, she wrote: “Have… a… good… day”. She didn’t live to see the day end. At 9.33 pm, she was dead.
Her 10-year-old body had taken the maximum impact of military grade RDX, ammonium and nitrate radicals packed into a golden LML Freedom motorbike parked right at the curve of Malegaon’s Bhikku Chowk. The bike and the conspiracy were later traced to Varachha, Surat, and to Pragyasingh Chandrapalsingh Thakur. Thakur is now Sadhvi Pragya, the saffron of her robes dominating the BJP’s Lok Sabha poll campaign in Bhopal, with the party pitting her against the Congress’s Digvijaya Singh.
Over a decade after the blasts, Farheen’s father Shaikh Liyaqat Mohiudeen, 60, clings on to memories of his little daughter, the youngest of his five children. Mohiudeen, a truck driver, says he always returned home from work to an excited Farheen. Once home, the two always had their ritual. “She would be thrilled to see me return… hear my stories from the road, and then take me out to the chowk to eat tikkis,” he recalls. Evenings were reserved for walking through Malegaon, sitting at the chowk’s tea stall, or picking bangles from the shops that Farheen thought made Malegaon shimmer at night.
Advertising
malegaon blast 2008, malegaon blast 2008 victims, malegaon blast 2008 victim parents, pragya thakur, sadhvi pragya thakur, malegaon blast pragya thakur, pragya thakur elections, pragya thakur polls, indian express newsMohiudeen and Farida say they can still hear the sound of the blast that killed her. (Express photo: Mubasshir Mushtaq)
Farheen’s mother Farida, 48, says she has often caught Mohiudeen pulling out Farheen’s photograph — taken in school after she won a scholarship — from his pocket and talking to her. At least he had found a way to deal with his grief, she says. She still hasn’t. “Ma hoon uski. Kitna pyaar karte the… aapko kaise samjhayen? Khelti chalti bachchi thi humaari…aur woh ekdum chidiya ki tarah gurr se ud gayi (I am her mother, how do I tell you how much we loved her? She was a playful child and suddenly, she flew away like a bird).”
On October 7, 2008, at the peak of the ATS investigation, when a team had called on Thakur’s address in Surat, it was a photograph of the dead Farheen and the final post-mortem report that sat on the desk of Hemant Karkare, who led the probe.
Officers who assisted the late ATS chief recall an upset Karkare — himself a father to two girls — having returned from the blast site, moved and shaken by the photograph. The forensic report detailed the nature of her splinter injuries, with nothing except her face intact.
“In every probe briefing, he started with specific case studies of victims. Farheen was always remembered. He spoke of how we can never face Pakistan in peace negotiations if such barbaric attacks are done on Muslims inside our own borders,” says a Maharashtra Police officer from the 2008 investigation team.
Around 9.30 pm on September 29, 2008, the Shaikhs had been getting ready to break their Ramzan fast — and the only item missing was Farheen’s favourite, the tikkis made by the corner store chacha. It was the penultimate night before Eid-ul-Fitr. She decided to run the errand.
That night was Shabe-Qadr — a period that is said to mark Prophet Mohammed receiving the first verses of the Quran – and mosques in Malegaon were reciting the Tarawih prayer. That meant that the crowd of worshippers from the three corners of Bhikku Chowk — the Qasab Bada Masjid in the north, the Noorani Masjid in the south, and Nayapura Ahle-Hadith Masjid in the east — were still inside when the IED exploded.
The planters had evidently not factored in the extended prayer schedule or the dates in the Ramzan calendar. They had timed the bomb for it to set off around 9.30 pm when, they thought, Bhikku Chowk and its tea stalls would be the most crowded.

Seven persons were killed and 101 injured. Locals confirm the casualties would have escalated had the blast taken place anytime later, after the crowd from Noorani Masjid, Malegaon’s biggest, had spilled out.
Transcripts of alleged phone conversations between Thakur and ‘planter’ Ramji Kalsangra — produced in court in October 2018 — seem to indicate she had expected the casualty figure to be higher: “You had calculated many would die when you went there!” she chides Kalsangra, according to the transcripts.
That night, back at the Shaikh home, the tikkis never came. The first to hit the Shaikhs was a huge squall of dust. Their roof, a mere 50 metres from the blast site, couldn’t take the impact. The silence that followed the blast was even louder. Then the noises started. It had been 15 minutes since the explosion and Farheen hadn’t returned. Mohiudeen recalls he didn’t have the courage to look for her: “Ek ajeeb si ghabrahat chalu ho gayi… (A strange fear began stirring inside me).”
He hoped Farheen was hiding around the tea stall and assured his wife she must be safe. Next, they heard police firing and the wails following a stampede. Farida had to wait till late night, before someone told her a girl’s body lay covered at Faran Hospital. She says she still recalls the first time she heard the words: “Asmani rang ka kapda pehni hui? Woh bachchi toh nikal chuki hai (The girl in the sky blue dress? She is dead)”.
“Till date, the sound of the explosion booms in my ears. I can hear it when I want,” she says.
That night, just before she had rushed out, Farheen had draped a new purchase — her first dupatta, gifted by her father — and stopped to admire herself in the mirror. Farheen’s elder sister Farzana recalls how Farheen would always yank the dupatta off her mother and sisters and run with the breeze across the streets.
The whole evening, Farheen had bragged how her “gulabi rang ka dupatta” would make her look the most radiant on the night of Eid, recalls Farzana. Farheen was buried on October 1, the day of Eid-ul-Fitr.
At the hospital, Farida was not allowed to see anything beyond Farheen’s face. “They told me I would not be able to see anything else… I returned home,” she says.
At Faran Hospital in Malegaon, Dr Saeed Farani, who deposed before the NIA court on December 6, 2018, doesn’t recall Farheen. “I would have if she had been brought alive… Our focus that night was to attend to those who had hope.”
In the 2006 blasts in Malegaon, his 25-bed hospital had seen 173 patients; in 2008, 100 patients. Around 56 of the injured had serious splinter injuries.
“The bodies of 2006 and 2008 had similar injuries — huge, irregular metal pieces entering the body. Those were high-velocity wounds, like gun shots, but all over the body… the kind that tear the person, puncture the organs and basically leave nothing…”
Mohiudeen, who brought Farheen’s body home, recalls how it had then seemed like a cruel joke that she had to be brought back dead from hospital. “Farheen wanted to be a doctor,” he says. “She always said I wouldn’t need to drive my truck once she became a doctor. When she was not helping her mother or tending to goats, Farheen was always studying. Of my five children, she was the brightest.”
Farida talks about Farheen’s love for the stethoscope, how the “ziddi” girl would follow the neighbourhood “doctorni” around and write “prescriptions”. “We always thought she would achieve something, become famous. Jitni badi nahin thi utni badi baaten kar leti thi (She was small, but had big dreams),” she says.
The family says Farheen’s death brought Mohiudeen illnesses that never left him — a bypass in 2014 and a recurring tuberculosis have left his body broken. Yet, he goes to Bada Qabristan every Friday to recite fatihah (prayer) at the grave of his daughter, after offering namaz at Hamidiya Masjid inside the Bada Qabristan.
“We still have faith in the Indian judiciary… it’s our only hope,” he says. Then, without naming Thakur, he adds, “She will not win. I am 100 per cent sure. She cursed Karkare. Sitting in Malegaon, 500 km from her, I have cursed her. So have families of the other victims. I am a truck driver whose daughter she robbed. The curse of an oppressed is always stronger than that of a saint. In any religion.”
  Every year, the family distributes biryani to the poor on September 29, and Mohiudeen spends several evenings buying tikkis to the many Farheens who play outside his doorstep. Bhikku Chowk is now called ‘Hemant Karkare Chowk’ and the clock at the shop outside which Farheen died is stuck at 9.33.


May 09, 2019

India: Malegaon’s wanted, linked to Pragya, held bomb training camps





Malegaon’s wanted, linked to Pragya, held bomb training camps: Gauri Lankesh probe SIT to court

In the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, Pragya Singh Thakur, the BJP’s Bhopal Lok Sabha candidate, is an accused along with 13 others, including two missing Abhinav Bharat members, Ramji Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, who have been declared “proclaimed offenders”.

Amit Shah, Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Pragya Singh Thakur at a roadshow in Bhopal on Wednesday. PTI
Four missing members of Hindutva outfit Abhinav Bharat, all wanted for blasts in the Samjhauta Express, Mecca Masjid, Ajmer Dargah and Malegaon between 2006 and 2008, trained several suspects linked to the Sanatan Sanstha in making bombs at secret training camps across the country between 2011-2016, the investigation by the Karnataka Police into the murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh has revealed. This disclosure is part of documents submitted by the SIT to a Bengaluru court.
In the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, Pragya Singh Thakur, the BJP’s Bhopal Lok Sabha candidate, is an accused along with 13 others, including two missing Abhinav Bharat members, Ramji Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, who have been declared “proclaimed offenders”.
According to documents submitted in court by the Karnataka SIT probing the Lankesh case, three men linked to Sanatan Sanstha, and arrested in the Lankesh murder case, and four witnesses, who attended the training camps, described the presence of a “Babaji” and four “Gurujis” at the camps where training was given in making bombs.
The “Babaji” was identified after his arrest in November 2018 — 11 years after he went into hiding — in Gujarat as Suresh Nair, an Abhinav Bharat member accused in the 2007 Ajmer dargah blast case.
Nair’s arrest has also revealed that the three other bomb experts at Sanstha-linked camps were Dange, Kalsangara and Ashwini Chauhan — all “proclaimed offenders” in the Samjhauta Express case and four other blast cases, said sources.
A fifth trainer who attended the camps has been identified by those arrested in the Lankesh case as Prathap Hazra, who is linked to the Hindutva outfit Bhavani Sena of West Bengal.
Links between missing suspects from bombings tied to Abhinav Bharat between 2006 and 2008, which killed 117 people, and the members of a group associated with the Lankesh murder have unravelled in recent months in the course of the SIT probe.
Based on descriptions provided by those arrested in the Lankesh case and witnesses who saw the “bomb experts”, sketches of the “guest trainers” were prepared by the SIT and their possible locations were identified through technical analysis.
And on the information provided by the SIT, Nair, who police believe was “Babaji” in the training camps was arrested by the Gujarat ATS in Bharuch in November 2018. When Nair was shown portraits of the other trainers at camps, he identified them as Dange, Kalsangara and Amit Hakla alias Ashwini Chauhan, said sources.
Dange, a former RSS worker who is considered a bomb expert and has an Interpol red corner notice against him, is on the most wanted list of the NIA with Kalsangara and Hakla. Dange and Kalsangara carry a Rs 10 lakh reward on their heads while Hakla carries a Rs 5 lakh reward on his head.
Following Nair’s arrest, NIA sources said Dange and Kalsangara were still hiding in India and that efforts were on to arrest them.
The descriptions for “Babaji” were provided in the course of the Lankesh case probe by three arrested men Shrikant Pangarkar, 40, a former Shiv Senacouncillor from Maharashtra, Sharad Kalaskar, 26, who is also the alleged shooter in the 2013 Narendra Dabholkar murder case, and Vasudev Suryavanshi, 29, a mechanic who allegedly stole motorcycles for a series of Sanatan linked murders of rationalists and free thinkers between 2015 and 2017.
The SIT has found that 19 training camps were organised by the Sanatan Sanstha linked group in the usage of firearms, improvised explosive devices and subterfuge tactics across India between 2011 and 2017 with the five IED experts attending five of the camps in Maharashtra, Gujarat and Karnataka as “guest trainers”.
According to statements provided by suspects and witnesses in the Lankesh case, some trainers like “Babaji” moved around in the garb of monks. Each trainer, sources said, had his own area of expertise ranging from petrol bombs to sophisticated pipe bombs with electrical circuits – on the lines of mobile phone triggered IEDs used in some of the blasts that occurred between 2006-08.
Giving descriptions of four trainers who he saw at IED camps held at Ahmedabad and Mangalore, an accused in the Lankesh case described them as “Babaji Sir”, “Circuit Expert Sir”, “Bengali” and “Lambu Sir”.’ Another suspect describes two trainers at another camp in Jalna as “Babaji” and “Guruji”.
According to the case documents the camps provided training to dozens of people recruited by a covert unit of the Sanatan Sanstha linked to the murders of the rationalist Dabholkar, leftist thinker Govind Pansare, Kannada scholar M M Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh.
The suspects in the Lankesh and other murder cases who attended the IED training camps are Amit Degwekar, Kalaskar, Pangarkar, Suryavanshi, Ganesh Miskin, Amit Baddi and Bharat Kurne. Four men who were part of the group – currently considered witnesses in the Lankesh case – also attended some of the camps.
As many as five “training camps” – Jalna in 2011, Jalna in January 2015, Mangalore in August 2015, Ahmedabad in November 2015 and Nasik in January 2016 – were held by suspects from Abhinav Bharat, the SIT investigation has revealed.

April 26, 2019

Important article on BJP's Pragya Singh Thakur and co in 2008 Malegaon Blast and Hindutva Terrorism

Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 45, Issue No. 36, 04 Sep, 2010 » Abhinav Bharat, the Malegaon Blast and Hindu Nationalism: Resisting and Emulating Islamist Terrorism

Abhinav Bharat, the Malegaon Blast and Hindu Nationalism: Resisting and Emulating Islamist Terrorism

In recent years, some Hindutva-minded people have created or joined new militias, which have actually turned out to be terrorist groups whose main aim is to take revenge on Indian Muslims for past acts of terrorism that some Islamists have carried out. This new development became clear during the inquiry regarding the Malegaon blast of 2008. The Hindu militants who were allegedly responsible for this attack were all members of a new group, Abhinav Bharat, which resorted to violent action to resist the Islamists by emulating them. This article is based on the police report on the Malegaon case, a very interesting source for two reasons. One, it provides rich pieces of factual information regarding the actors of the plot and their motivations. Two, it presents us with the discourse of the Hindu nationalists when they speak between themselves since these excerpts include the transcripts of secret meetings they held in 2007-08 that one of the participants recorded.
Please click on the link to download the court/police documents which are extensively referred to in the text  .  DOWNLOAD


https://www.epw.in/journal/2010/36/special-articles/abhinav-bharat-malegaon-blast-and-hindu-nationalism-resisting-and

October 30, 2018

India - Malegaon Terrorism Case 2008: Lt Col Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya Among 7 Hindutva Activists Charged

Lt Col Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya Among 7 Charged In 2008 Malegaon Blast Case

Malegaon Blast Case 2008: The accused have been charged with being part of a terrorist act, and under IPC they have been charged with criminal conspiracy and murder.


Lt Col Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya Among 7 Charged In 2008 Malegaon Blast Case
Malegaon blast case: All the accused were present in the court during the framing of charges.
Mumbai: A special court in Mumbai on Tuesday framed charges against Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and five others under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and several sections in the September 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case.
Judge Vinod Padalkar, presiding over the special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court, framed charges against the accused persons.
Under the UAPA, the accused have been charged with being part of a terrorist act, and under IPC they have been charged with criminal conspiracy and murder.
Framing of charges is a process after which the trial in a criminal case starts.
2556en0g
Sadhvi Pragya has been charged in 2008 Malegaon blasts case
Apart from Lt Col Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya, the other accused in Malegaon blast case are Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Sameer Kulkarni.
All the accused were present in the court when the judge read out the charges against them.


Six people were killed and over 100 injured when an explosive device strapped on a motorcycle went off near a mosque in Malegaon, a town about 200 km from Mumbai in north Maharashtra, on September 29, 2008.

source:  https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/2008-malegaon-blast-case-lt-col-prasad-purohit-sadhvi-pragya-others-charged-with-terror-conspiracy-m-1939899

September 01, 2017

India: A hero’s welcome accorded by Times Now and Republic TV to Lt Col Purohit, malegaon blast accused (released on bail) | Jyoti Punwani / The Hoot

The Hoot

A hero’s welcome for Lt Col Purohit

BY JYOTI PUNWANI| IN Media Practice | 01/09/2017

Never has a terror accused released on bail received the kind of welcome Times Now and Republic TV accorded to Malegaon blast accused Lt Col Purohit.
JYOTI PUNWANI’S bemused account


HERE’S LOOKING AT  USJyoti  Punwani 

Never has a terror accused been given the kind of welcome on his release on bail, as was accorded to Malegaon blast accused Lt Col Purohit by news channels Times Now and Republic TV.
 ``Exclusive’’ interviews with the accused; syrupy exchanges with his wife; running commentaries on the accused  being escorted out of prison…Republic TV even had a headline saying ``continuous coverage’’.
As it turned out, the coverage by both was quite hilarious.
Sample the following:
``First interview of Lt Col Purohit’’ went the headline on Republic TV, and this was it:  ``Love your nation, keep serving your nation.’’  These two sentences made up the accused army man’s reply on being asked what he had to say after having been granted bail. But that’s not what the reporter wanted. So he kept at it: You were in jail for nine years, do you think it was because of the mistake of any authority ? Purohit simply said: `I’m not going to say anything.’’ Not one to give up, the reporter beseeched him: ``You will be out of jail tomorrow at 11 am. We expect that your first interview will be to Republic.”  Prompt came the reply: ``Have hopes.’’ Or was it ``high hopes?”
One more exclusive followed. ``Lt Col speaks to Republic again’’, was the headline, with the hashtag #PurohittoRepublic.  The visual showed many reporters around the accused army man, who only kept saying: ``I can’t say anything’’, ``I will not talk about the case’’, ending with ``I am just happy now, that’s it, and again, Jai Hind’’.
As he left, the reporters followed him. ``Is there a Ganpati established in your house?’’ asked one. ```Are you waiting to meet your mother and eat?’’ ``Food,’’ added as an afterthought.
This 1.25 minute clip was replayed four times on Republic TV. After that the anchor came on.  ``That viewers, is Lt Col Purohit taking direct questions from my colleague Aditya.’’
Times Now, which ran the coverage with a headline #Justice for Purohit, and below that: ``Bail for army `hero’’’, also had its own `exclusive’. Its reporter repeated the same question four times: ``Have you been framed? Do you feel you have been framed?’’ Then came an answer, somewhat inaudible because of the surrounding noise: ``It is not a feeling.’’ The reporter then asked twice over:  ``It’s not a feeling, so it’s a fact?”  The accused: ``Obviously.’’
End of interview.
Then there was the Times Now reporter asking Purohit’s wife: ``It’s been nine long years… How long have you not been in touch with him?’’ her voice dripping with sympathy.
``Ten days,’’ replied the wife.
All of this could have been laughed off had it not been for the opinions voiced by the anchors of both channels throughout the coverage. They made it clear that the Colonel who was arrested for the 2008 Malegaon blast which killed 7 Muslims, had been framed by the Congress to build up the theory of  ``saffron terror’’, in order to ``get into appeasement’’. The case ``reeked of’’ having been framed for political reasons.  The granting of bail was described as ``justice having been done’’. While Republic had headlines such as ``Who fixed the Colonel?’’  ``Who will give him nine years back?’’ Times Now’s headline said ``Army `hero’ out on bail’. Indeed, the day before  bail was granted, Republic summarized a ``statement’’ from him, presenting his version.
``It’s in fact full support of the Indian army for Lt Col Purohit,’’ breathed the Times Now reporter as the accused officer was escorted out of jail by army vehicles. ``This is also to tell the world at large that the Indian army is with Col Purohit, that he was wrongly charged with terror charges, that’s what the army is trying to say, at least from the visuals we can only think of that.’’
Interestingly, the reporter in his excitement went on to say that this was the first time the army had openly showed its support for its accused officer. Until now, its support had been through ``off camera briefings, leaking of documents such as commission of inquiry reports.’’
Good to know that.
NDTV and India Today were not so gung-ho about the army. Both channels had special episodes questioning the army’s escorting a terror accused out of jail.
Times Now and Republic TV persisted in linking the case to the Congress despite the obvious reluctance of Purohit, his wife, even his lawyers, to dwell on this aspect, though all of them touched upon it. Ironically, it was left to ``legal eagle’’ Harish Salve, (Republic TV used this epithet whenever they mentioned Salve who had argued  Purohit’s bail application), his other lawyer Neela Gokhale and  Purohit’s wife to point out that he was only out on bail, and that he still had to face a trial where his fate would be decided by the court. When Salve said the case had to run its course, the Republic TV anchor reproached him for being too ``measured’’.
Aparna Purohit’s gentle reminder to the Times Now reporter that they still had a long way to go,  didn’t faze the latter.  She informed the accused’s wife that Harish Salve had said that the maximum punishment her husband would face would be seven years and he had already spent that much time behind bars, ``so he’s not going back to jail.’’
"When Salve said the case had to run its course, the Republic TV anchor reproached him for being too ``measured"

Arnab Goswami, who started his programme by saying: ``Srikant has got bail’’, went on to rue that the Colonel had started being referred to as ``Terrorist Purohit”, instead of ``Lt Col Purohit’’. ``That hurt him the most, almost brought him to tears,’’ said Goswami, in his most sensitive tone.
``Terrorist Purohit’’? This writer is still wondering who had referred to the accused army officer in those terms.
Goswami then gushed about having had the privilege of knowing Purohit’s wife over the years. ``I’m really happy,’’ he said.
``Nine years without bail’’, ``nine years without charges being framed’’ – not just Times Now and Republic TV, but all news channels couldn’t stop emphasizing this terror-accused’s ``nine year ordeal’’.  But did they try to find out what had caused the delay? Harish Salve gave a clue when he mentioned that the accused’s appeal against MCOCA had been finally decided only in 2015.
Considering that this was a continuing story, the reporters had had enough time to find out why Purohit was getting bail after so many years. They just didn’t want to spoil the heartrending ``nine years narrative’’ by explaining it.
Though India Today’s coverage was balanced, it too ran a completely one-sided report from Pune, where the terror accused’s family lives. One of his friends was interviewed, a man of few words, who declared that his friend was innocent. Anchor Avantika and reporter Pankaj Khelkar made up for his laconic style by waxing eloquent not only about how Purohit was made a ``pawn in a political conspiracy’’, but also how ``we could see it on his face – how he has suffered for nine years’’.
Others too have suffered, and for longer periods. Have these channels ever accorded the same gushing treatment to the Muslim terror accused who come out of prison after 10 years, 14 years? Have they asked their wives/mothers how they’ve managed the social ostracism they’ve invariably faced? Most of these Muslim accused come out only after having been honourably acquitted, for rarely do the courts favour them with bail. Yet, no channel fetes them on their innocence having been proved by the court, their ``honour’’ having been restored . No channel narrates the suffering the State has inflicted on them. No channel asks them if they would take action against the agencies who framed them.
"Have these channels ever accorded the same gushing treatment to the Muslim terror accused who come out of prison after 10 years, 14 years? "

Purohit’s bail has not come in a vacuum. NDTV, CNN IBN and India Today mentioned the backdrop of Hindutva terror cases coming apart after the BJP government came to power. From each one of them, one learnt something new. While India Today’s Gaurav Sawant spoke about the aspersions cast upon the NIA chief who has been getting extension after extension, CNN IBN’s legal reporter Utkarsh Anand gave a detailed description of the way the NIA had ``diluted’’ the charges against Purohit and its half-hearted opposition to the colonel’s bail application in the Supreme Court.
NDTV’s Sreenivasan Jain’s `Reality check’ had former public prosecutor Rohini Salian on the show. She stood by her allegation that she had been asked to go soft by the NIA. Jain asked Salve about all this, and despite the eminent lawyer’s sarcasm and annoyance, kept reading transcripts of incriminating conversations from the case papers. ``You talk about justice, but when one accused after the other gets bail, where is the justice?” he asked Salve.
Again, in the face of RSS spokesman Rakesh Sinha’s agitated denials about saffron terror, Jain repeatedly pointed out that of the three Hindus convicted by the trial court in the Ajmer blast, two were RSS pracharaks. That provoked Sinha into asking: ``But has the Supreme Court convicted them?”
If it does, will Sinha accept that saffron terror exists? Jain didn’t ask that question, but viewers can keep it in mind.
None of this background, crucial to understanding any case, was raised by either the Times Now or Republic TV’s anchors.
Surprisingly, even the Times of India, after making the Supreme Court’s granting of bail the main Page one lead, and devoting half of page 2 and two other stories inside to Purohit, did not give this background. Indeed, in the inside report on the bail proceedings, the paper described the Malegaon blast in which Purohit is the main accused, thus: ``attack on Muslim targets allegedly carried out by Hindutva radicals to avenge the deaths of Hindus in a wave of jihadi attacks’’.  It  was the only newspaper to ascribe motives for the blast.
The next day, it had an interview with the accused. Wrote the paper’s Law Editor Swati Deshpande: ``His absolute faith in the armed forces shone through every word.’’
Indian Express went one step ahead of TOI in its reportage – while the front page story reported the grounds for bail, three other reports on Page 9 were in favour of Purohit and his co-accused. His friends were interviewed, and his army honours and citations reproduced.
Neither of the two national papers which have Mumbai editions, thought fit to interview Rohini Salian.
"Wrote the paper’s Law Editor Swati Deshpande: ``His absolute faith in the armed forces shone through every word"

However, the Express also had a backgrounder on the same day on Page 11. Rahul Tripathi explained the allegations against the army man, and revealed that the NIA had recorded statements of Military Intelligence officers who said they were not aware of his alleged undercover operation to infiltrate the Hindutva organization Abhinav Bharat. That he had kept his seniors informed had been Purohit’s strongest defence in the Supreme Court.
On August 31, the Indian Express had another report. titled `Probe said Purohit held `illegal’ meetings with radical Hindu groups’. Deeptiman Tiwary quoted in detail a 2011 inquiry report of the Directorate General of Military Intelligence which nailed Purohit’s defence. Unfortunately, it was on Page 10.
One statement repeated by Harish Salve in all interviews was that witnesses had told the NIA that their statements to the Maharashtra ATS, the agency that arrested Purohit, were given under pressure. But it was only Mumbai Mirror’s Sharmeen Hakim who explained why the NIA had to record statements of these witnesses again, when the ATS had already done so. It was because these statements had mysteriously disappeared last year.
The coverage by the Hindustan Times and the Hindu was balanced. Both had the first report of bail having been granted on page one. In that report itself, HT’s Bhadra Sinha linked the bail to the pattern of Hindutva terror cases falling apart. Two days later, Presley Thomas had another backgrounder, indicting the ATS for its feeble defence of its own case.
The Hindu had a daring headline – given the hype surrounding this army officer -- `A former MCOCA detainee gets bail’ with a picture of the accused officer covering his face.
The next day, a special correspondent quoted a retired intelligence officer connected with the case expressing unhappiness at the way the NIA had soft-pedalled it. The article’s headline however, was misleading: `Purohit bail will have no bearing on trial'.
Overall, the coverage of the Supreme Court granting bail to  the first serving army officer to be charged with a terrorist act, went in his favour. Visuals being more powerful than text, it is difficult to forget the cameras that followed this accused as he left court and jail, and the tearful interviews given by his wife. Even in print, it is baffling how no newspaper thought fit to interview the families of those who were killed in the blasts that Purohit is accused of engineering. The TOI  did however, quote two Muslim Congress leaders from Malegaon who said they might file a review petition against the Supreme Court order.
But the coverage by Times Now and Republic TV was disturbing in its open bias. The two are said to be the most-watched English news channels. By declaring the first army officer to be charged with terror as innocent even before the court does so, by calling him a hero, what message are they sending to their viewers, specifically to Muslims? Their coverage matters specially to Muslims for two reasons: 1) Muslims are immediately accused the moment a terrorist act takes place; 2) the spate of Hindutva terrorist acts, to which Purohit is linked, have specifically targeted Muslims.  

India: 2008 Malegaon blasts case - Did Hemant Karkare ‘fix’ Lt Col Purohit? | Rajdeep Sardesai

Hindustan Times

2008 Malegaon blasts case: Did Hemant Karkare ‘fix’ Lt Col Purohit?

The political tug of war over national security has left 26/11 terror attack martyr Hemant Karkare’s honour at stake

columns Updated: Sep 01, 2017 07:19 IST
Police and civilians escort a vehicle carrying the body of Hemant Karkare, the chief of the anti-terrorist squad, Mumbai, November 29, 2008
Police and civilians escort a vehicle carrying the body of Hemant Karkare, the chief of the anti-terrorist squad, Mumbai, November 29, 2008 (Kunal Patil /HT)


Asking inconvenient questions is what professional journalists are meant to do, so let me ask it upfront: Was Hemant Karkare, the Maharashtra police officer who was “martyred” during the 26/11 terror attack, a consummate liar and a pawn in the hands of the political establishment?
I ask this because in the light of the bail granted to Lieutenant Colonel Shrikant Purohit in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, there is an underlying narrative being pushed that the Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) headed by Karkare had “fixed” a “nationalist” hero like Purohit only because the then UPA government wanted to raise the bogey of “saffron” terror.
I also ask this question because I “knew” the soft-spoken Karkare as an “honourable” police officer with whom I had several long off the record conversations. A day before the attack, Karkare had rung up to say he wanted to finally “speak out”. The Shiv Sena mouthpiece Saamna had run a sustained campaign against the officer, describing him as “anti-Hindu”. He sounded very anxious. I promised to come down to Mumbai and do the interview over the weekend. Only the very next day, Mumbai was bloodied by terror and Karkare made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty.

Read more
Now, almost a decade later, I am troubled: Could it be that the officer who was cremated with full national honours has suddenly become a “suspect” in the eyes of the investigating agencies? The National Investigation Agency (NIA) chargesheet in the Malegaon case claims that at least two important witnesses were forced to give false incriminating statements against the accused, including Purohit. It is the divergence in the chargesheets filed by the NIA and the Maharashtra ATS that has been cited as an important reason for granting bail to Purohit.
Where once we had a Congress home minister who spoke loosely of “Hindu” terror, now the BJP home minister is the very individual who had openly defended Sadhvi Pragya, the key Malegaon blast accused. When the political superiors of the prosecuting agencies have such widely publicly differing positions on a serious terror charge, can one reasonably expect the investigation to be truly non-partisan and independent?
The truth is, a sharply-polarising political narrative has shadowed almost every major terror investigation in India. Where once we were told that Right-wing groups like Abhinav Bharat had emerged to counter Islamicist terror, now it seems that such terror modules were simply “manufactured” by the UPA government to embarrass the BJP and Sangh parivar. Where once we were provided detailed transcripts of “terror tapes” involving individuals like Purohit and Pragya (the audio conversations run into several hours), now we are being told to completely disregard them as “planted” information. Witnesses suddenly turn hostile even as a public prosecutor resigns saying she was asked to “go slow” by the NIA post 2014. The Gujarat police officers who were arrested as “fake” encounter specialists are now being released and lionised as heroes.
Look at the mess then that a country whose leadership promises “zero tolerance” to terror finds itself in. We now have completely contrarian versions being offered to the Samjhauta Express blasts of 2007: Was it the LeT-ISI-SIMI nexus or were Sangh supporters like Swami Aseemanand involved? Then, be it the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts, Ajmer blasts, or the Mecca Masjid blasts in Hyderabad where the original case was built up against local Muslims only to be later pinned on Right-wing Hindu groups, the country’s track record in successfully prosecuting terror cases is highly dodgy.
Sadly, by projecting terror through a partisan Hindu-Muslim prism, India’s political class has dangerously compromised national security. It is increasingly apparent now: Either the previous Congress-led government was lying or the present government is “protecting” the accused. There is now an equally disturbing “nationalist” narrative that has crept in: Challenging the official version is now an “anti-national” act, making it virtually impossible to separate hard facts from the ceaseless propaganda.
Where does this leave Karkare? Dead men can’t defend themselves so one can only hope that the State comes clean: Either “expose” Karkare’s investigation as a hit-job or stand firmly by him. The political tug of war over national security has left a professional policeman’s honour at stake.
Post-script: Just a few days before Purohit was granted bail, 10 anonymous Muslim men walked free after spending more than a decade in jail after the prosecution failed to prove their involvement in the 2005 Hyderabad suicide bomb case. Only this time, there were no noisy prime time debates, no “nationalist” outrage. The acquitted, quite simply it seems, belonged to the wrong religion.
Rajdeep Sardesai is a senior journalist and author
The views expressed are personal

August 22, 2017

India: Supreme Court Bail to Col. Purohit - Statement from JTSA

Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Association

Col. Purohit: Aryavarta’s soldier, not a mere mole

The Malegaon accused Col. Purohit has been granted bail by the Supreme Court. We know that bail in terror cases, especially those involving bomb blasts, is rare, if not altogether impossible to secure. Take fore example, the following cases. Mohd. Aamir Khan’s bail application was repeatedly turned down even when his lawyer furnished medical certificates vouching that his old mother has suffered a paralytic stroke.  This, when he had spent over 12 years in jail, and had been acquitted in over dozen of the 19 cases he was implicated in. The reason was that the case was too ‘sensitive’. Abdul Wahid Shaikh spent 11 years as an undertrial in the Mumbai suburban train blasts case, during which he developed an eye ailment following custodial torture but his bail application on medical grounds was rejected consistently. Even where absolutely NO violence was alleged, as in the Kabir Kala Manch case, Sachin Mali, Sagar Ghorke and Ramesh Ghaichor could secure bail only from the apex court five years into their incarceration. We hope the 'justice' shown to Lt. Col. Purohit can be extended to all terror-accused. [. . .]

read full text here : http://www.sacw.net/article13439.html

June 30, 2017

India: Hindutva terrorist Sadhvi Pragya who is prime accused in 2008 Malegaon bombing to stay in jail (Ashwin Aghor / CatchNews)

CatchNews

Court puts its foot down. 'Saffron terrorist' Sadhvi Pragya to stay in jail

[by]Ashwin Aghor | Updated on: 29 June 2016, 3:09 IST

A special NIA court in Mumbai Tuesday denied bail to Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur. She is the prime accused in the 2008 Malegaon bombing, which had killed eight people and left 101 injured.

Although the NIA has identified Pragya as the main accused in the case, it has dropped charges under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act against her and five of the other 13 accused.

In its chargesheet filed on 13 May - the third in the case, following the two filed by the Maharashtra ATS - the NIA claimed it did not have "sufficient evidence" to charge the accused under the MCOCA. On 30 May, Pragya's lawyer applied for bail on the grounds that the charges under MOCOA had been dropped against her. The court directed the NIA to respond to the plea, and scheduled the hearing for 28 June.

In the meantime, Nishar Ahmed, a businessman from Malegaon who lost his son in the blast, filed an intervention application on 17 June, objecting to the bail application filed by Pragya. At the hearing on Tuesday, Nishar's lawyer Wahab Khan forcefully argued against granting bail. The NIA, on the other hand, said it had no objection.

After considering "all facts and arguments", however, the court rejected the bail application.

Speaking to the media later, Wahab Khan claimed the court "came down heavily on the NIA while rejecting the bail application". "This is a major defeat for the NIA. Had the court granted bail to Pragya, all other accused would have followed suit and the matter would have dragged on for another decade or more. It's already eight years and the case is still pending. Granting bail to the accused would have delayed it further. The court blasted NIA officials for loopholes in their investigation," he said.
Had Pragya got bail, other accused too would have sought it, dragging the case on for another decade

A lawyer who was in court to witness the proceedings, however, denied that judge SD Tokle passed strictures against the NIA. "The court simply told the NIA that the grounds for bail were not sufficient. Although the agency did not oppose the bail, the court opined that it would affect the investigations, hence cancelled the bail," the lawyer, who didn't want to be named, said.

Wahab Khan insisted otherwise. "The rejection of the application itself is as good as strictures from the court. It is also significant in terms of the fate of the accused, since no other accused will try to seek bail now," he said.

The case relates to the bombing of Bhiku Chowk in Malegaon on 29 September 2008. The bomb was planted on a motorcycle.

The probe was initially conducted by the Maharashtra ATS, led by the late Hemant Karkare. It revealed that the motorcycle belonged to Pragya. This breakthrough helped the ATS unravel a vast terrorist conspiracy involving a group of Hindutva extremists calling themselves Abhinav Bharat. The ATS eventually arrested a serving army officer, Lt Col Prasad Purohit, a retired army major, Ramesh Upadhyay, and a self-proclaimed Hindu seer Sudhakar Dwivedi, apart from Pragya.

The ATS filed a chargesheet on 20 January 2009, and another on 21 April 2011, naming 14 people as the accused. Of them, Sadhvi Pragya, Ramesh Upadhyay, Prasad Purohit, Sameer Kulkarni, Rakesh Dhawade, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Pravin Takalki are in jail. Shivnarayan Kalsangra, Shyam Sahu, Raja Rahirkar and Jagdish Mhatre are out on bail, while Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Bange are absconding.
×

The investigation was later handed over to the NIA in 2011.

March 10, 2017

India: On the status of Hindu right-wing terror cases india (Rajesh Ahuja / Hindustan Times

Malegaon to Malegaon: The status of Hindu right-wing terror cases