|
Showing posts with label Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government. Show all posts

March 28, 2023

India: Official Circular of Uttar Pradesh Govt directs 75 dist. magistrates & top officials to organise ‘Akhand Ramayan Paath’ on Hindu religious festivals in March 2023


Has Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath found a new way to usher in ‘Hindu Rashtra’ in India’s most-populous state? This is reflected in an official circular his government issued to each of the 75 District Magistrates (DMs) as well as divisional commissioners. The circular directs these officials to organise special ‘Akhand Ramayan Paath’ on the occasion of ‘Ashtami’ and Ram Navami during the Navratri festival between March 22 and March 30.

--read more at: 'UP government’s message is disturbing, divisive' by Sharat Pradhan (Mar 27 2023)

https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/up-government-s-message-is-disturbing-divisive-1203937.html

March 01, 2020

India: RSS men packed in Modi's govts 1 & 2

The Print, 27 January, 2020

RSS in Modi govt in numbers — 3 of 4 ministers are rooted in the Sangh

Of 53 BJP ministers in Modi govt, 38 have a Sangh background. In Modi’s first term, 41 of 66 BJP ministers who had taken oath in 2014 were from RSS.
Neelam Pandey and Shanker Arnimesh 27 January, 2020 9:00 am IST


New Delhi: One out of five BJP MPs associated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) were appointed as ministers in the Narendra Modi cabinet 2019 but this ratio is 1:14 for party MPs who do not have a Sangh background.

Simply put, parliamentarians with an RSS background had three times better ministerial prospects than the others, a fact that aspiring ministers should bear in mind amid speculation about a possible revamp of Team Modi.

It should come as no surprise, though, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a former RSS pracharak himself. The No.2 in the government, Home Minister and former BJP president Amit Shah, was also associated with the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the RSS’ students wing. It also explains the influence of the Sangh ideology on government policies.

Of the 53 ministers from the BJP in the Modi government, 38 have a Sangh background — 71 per cent of the total. This figure stood at 62 per cent in Modi’s first term when 41 of the 66 BJP ministers who had taken oath in 2014 were from the RSS.

The prime minister has, however, assigned several key portfolios to ministers who don’t have an RSS background, including Finance Minister Nirmala Sitaraman, Minister of External Affairs S. Jaishankar, Housing and Urban Affairs Minister Hardeep Singh Puri and Power Minister R.K. Singh.

A senior BJP leader played down the connection.

“Having an affiliation with the RSS is not a criterion to become a minister,” the leader said. “The PM and senior leadership take a call on this. To say someone is being promoted merely because they have links with the RSS is not a fair comment.”

The view was echoed by an RSS functionary. “The RSS has no role in deciding tickets for the party or deciding the portfolio. At the same time, RSS only believes in two things — there are those who are already with us and those who are yet to come under the fold,” the functionary said.

“As far as BJP leaders are concerned, Sushma Swaraj had no RSS background but she held important positions and even Jaswant Singh didn’t. So these categorisations are not correct.”

The Sangh footprint

Despite such protestations, the Sangh’s footprint on the Modi government is evident.

Of the 303 BJP MPs in the Lok Sabha, 146 or 48 per cent have an affiliation to the RSS. In the Rajya Sabha, of its 82 MPs, the BJP has 34 with links to the Sangh.

Such links are increasingly visible in the decision-making of the government as well.

For instance, a separate Ministry of Animal Husbandry, Dairy and Fisheries was created in Modi 2.0, a suggestion that has chiefly emerged from the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP). Besides, the National Education Policy (NEP) also lists numerous suggestions in the draft policy from Sangh-affiliated organisations.

Prior to the Lok Sabha elections last year, after pressure mounted by the RSS and VHP, the BJP government had asked the Supreme Court to expedite the Ayodhya title dispute case.

“The government wants to promote those who have ideological integrity. Compared to the previous Atal Bihari Vajpayee government, which didn’t enjoy a full majority, the Modi dispensation has made it quite clear that it is a government that has no qualms in furthering the Sangh agenda,” said Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay, a writer and journalist based in Delhi.

“Right from the PM, home minister and defence minister, all have an RSS background. The fact that there are more ministers from RSS background is also because this is the government’s way to integrate the Sangh Parivar in a better way so that there are no divisions,” added Mukhopadhyay who has written the books The RSS — Icons of the Indian Right and Narendra Modi: The Man, The Times.

Suhas Palshikar, who taught political science at Savitribai Phule Pune University, said the situation at the time of the Vajpayee government was very different because it was a coalition.

“I believe if we compare this with the Vajpayee government the situation might be different probably because it was a coalition government. As far as Modi government is concerned, we see a very specific relationship with the RSS, and their agenda is taken up by the government,” said Palshikar.

“As far as ministers are concerned, one may see those with an RSS background occupying important portfolios too. It is this unique situation between an organisation and a party where it is difficult to say who is controlling whom, but their agendas are definitely complementary and so are their political projects.”

The most important panel in the Modi cabinet, the cabinet committee on security (CCS), is dominated by the Sangh but does have two non-RSS members — Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar. The committee is chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and also has Home Minister Amit Shah and Defence Minister Rajnath, all from the Sangh Parivar.

The cabinet committee on economic affairs (CCEA), the second most important ministerial panel, is also dominated by those with RSS backgrounds. The committee consists of Rajnath Singh, Shah, Nitin Gadkari, D.V. Sadanand Gowda, Narendra Singh Tomar, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Piyush Goyal and Dharmendra Pradhan all of whom have links to the RSS. The only exceptions are, once again, Sitharaman and Jaishankar.

Where the link is really evident is in the RSS’ core interests of education, culture and labour. All of these portfolios are handled by ministers with close ties to the organisation — Ramesh Pokhriyal, Prahlad Singh Patel and Santosh Gangwar respectively.

January 30, 2019

India - Modi Govt's Temple Politics in Ayodhya before the 2019 Elections - The 67 acres game

Explained: The 67 acres in Ayodhya

What is the ‘excess' land that the Central government acquired in 1993? Where does it stand in relation to the demolished Babri Masjid? What is the argument in the government’s application in Supreme Court?

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/ram-janmabhoomi-nyas-the-67-acres-in-ayodhya-land-dispute-case-babri-masjid-demolition-supreme-court-5560297/

May 29, 2018

India: At tax-payers' expense six ministers of the Modi govt skipping ministry work to attend a three day meet with RSS

Meet with BJP ministers not coordination meeting, but exercise to interchange ideas: RSS

The government was represented by the six ministers -- Rajyavardhan Rathore, JP Nadda, Maneka Gandhi, Mahesh Sharma, Prakash Javadekar and Thawarchand Gehlot.

By: PTI | New Delhi | Published: May 29, 2018

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/meet-with-bjp-ministers-not-coordination-meeting-but-exercise-to-interchange-ideas-rss-5195069/

July 04, 2017

India: Fake UP govt website conducts poll on Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute - its URL misleading is misleadingly similar to the UP govt. www.ayodhya-issue.gov-up.in

Hindustan Times

Fake UP govt website conducts poll on Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute

The website – www.ayodhya-issue.gov-up.in – with its URL misleadingly similar to the UP government’s official website also carries a photograph of chief minister Adityanath.

india Updated: Apr 10, 2017 07:23 IST
Gulam Jeelani and M Tariq Khan
Hindustan Times, New Delhi/Lucknow

Close on the heels of the Supreme Court suggesting an out-of-court settlement to the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi issue, a fake UP government website has initiated a sort of referendum on the disputed structure in Ayodhya, attributing the initiative to the state’s new chief minister Yogi Adityanath.

The website – www.ayodhya-issue.gov-up.in – with its URL misleadingly similar to the UP government’s official website www.up.gov.in also carries a photograph of chief minister Adityanath. A WhatApp message seeking public opinion on the purported government initiative along with the link of the website went viral on Thursday.

The WhatsApp message reads: “Do you want Ram Mandir or Babri Masjid on the Ayodhya disputed land? I have participated in Online Poll on Ayodhya Issue. Request you to vote on http://ayodhya-issue.gov-up.in/. It is important to share our views with Govt.”

A similar message along with Adityanath’s photograph features on the home page of the website, which also has a link to the UP government’s official website at the bottom of the page.
The fake portal is misleadingly similar to the UP government’s official website and carries a photograph of chief minister Adityanath. (Screengrab)

The website and WhatsApp message seem to have sprung up soon after the top court’s March 21 observation for a negotiated settlement to the dispute, with the Chief Justice of India even offering to mediate between the two sides staking claim to the historic site in Ayodhya.

HT tracked the owner of the dubious website through its URL and found that it was registered in the name of Tarun Chaudhary, a south Delhi resident. But the phone number provided in the website’s details belonged to Akhtar Ali of Karnataka. Ali, who runs an IT firm in Bengaluru, said it was a mischief by someone who was misusing his mobile number.
Ads by ZINC

“We have just been informed about the website. I will inform the police about it,” Ali told HT on phone.

Apart from a deceptive URL and CM’s name, the website also carries the standard disclaimer at the bottom: “The contents of these sites are not to be construed as a responsibility of or endorsement by Dept. of Information and Public Relations and NIC” – a norm with all government websites.

Among the three options the opinion poll provides, the one for ‘constructing Ram Mandir’ at the disputed site had received more than 80 % votes till Friday evening. Also, one can vote any number of times in the poll.

Interestingly, the UP government, which on Thursday arrested a youth from Noida for allegedly posting “objectionable” images of Adityanath on social media, was caught unaware when confronted about the dubious website.

“It has just come to our knowledge. It is a fake website. Government has nothing to do with it. We will ask cyber cell to probe it,” said SK Ojha, director information, UP government.

March 23, 2017

Within 48 hours of Supreme Court Chief Justice suggesting an out court route for Ayodhya dispute case the UP Govt has gone ahead and set up an official on line opinion poll on Ayodhya

The new chief minister of Uttar Pradesh who campaigned for the 2017 UP assembly elections had repeatedly signalled should he be elected he would move to make the Ram Temple at the highly contentious site of the demolished Babri moque, knowing fully well that the matter is still subjudice.

the newspapers reports of 21 march 2017 told us that the chief justice of supreme court of India proposed and out of court settlement


a large number of newspapers editorials and commentators want the court not to shirk its responsibility settle this highly contentious matter that has lingered for years.
But the UP govt is in a great rush they have moved fast (or is it the BJP IT cell at work?)
check out the UP govt site: http://ayodhya-issue.gov-up.in/

UP govt seems to moving pretty fast on the Ayodhya issue - just 2 days ago the Chief Justice Supreme court of India suggest and out of court settlement


January 28, 2017

India: Chief Minister of Maharastra state orders withdrawal of letter by the state rural development department banning religious pictures in government offices

The Asian Age

Maharashtra CM drops letter banning religious photos in govt offices
THE ASIAN AGE. | AMEY TIRODKAR
Published : Jan 28, 2017

State government employees’ union has strongly protested actions being taken against the officer.
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis
 Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis
Mumbai: Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis has ordered the withdrawal of a letter by the state rural development department banning religious pictures in government offices after meeting Shiv Sena ministers. But the said letter is based on a government circular issued in June 2002.
The Asian Age has copies of the 2002 circular as well as the recent letter issued by the department reiterating the former’s contents. But overlooking the 2002 circular, the government has sought explanation from the concerned desk officer who issued the guidelines afresh earlier this month. The state government employees’ union has strongly protested actions being taken against the officer, against whom a show cause notice was served today. The desk officer, A.V. Warkade, was asked to give his explanation in writing by his superiors. When contacted by The Asian Age, Mr Warkade however refused to talk. “I am not authorised to speak to media,” he said.
On Friday morning, Mr Fadnavis ordered an inquiry into the said letter sent sent by Mr Warakade on January 4 of this year. “Any pictures of Gods, as well as religious festivals, writing slogans in government offices is not permitted under government rule and according to the Constitution,” stated the letter. The ruling Shiv Sena party strongly objected the letter reaching its peak on Thursday when Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray raised the issue in his political rally as well.
However, the issue of the letter was not a manifestation of a single man’s whim. In a government circular of rural development ministry from 2002, a copy of which is in possession of The Asian Age, clearly instructed their employees not to post any religious pictures in offices.
However, Mr Warakade issued the letter in his capacity as a desk officer, after receiving it from the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO). Maharashtra Cast Tribe Government Employees Welfare Union as well as Secular Movement Organisation had sent the letters to CMO demanding issuance of instructions on religious pictures in government offices.
When asked if blaming the officer was justified, Shiv Sena leader and Industry Minister Subhash Desai said, “There is no issue of generalisation. Be it circular from 2002 or 1947. This rule was not in actual implication, then why pushing it now? It is an emotional issue for us and till we are in the government we will never allow officers to disrespect emotions of Hindus.”
The State Government Employees Union has also showed their discontent for taking actions against the officer. The union’s general secretary G.D. Kuthe said, “The officer shall not be punished as the letter was sent with good intentions. Union will see that there won’t be an injustice.”

November 07, 2016

India: RSS imprint on Khattar government runs deep in Haryana

Hindustan Times

Hindutva hotbed: RSS imprint on Khattar government runs deep in Haryana

  • Navneet Sharma, Chandigarh
  • Updated: Nov 07, 2016 13:18 IST
Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar waves to crowd. (HT File Photo)

When Manohar Lal Khattar, a one-time pracharak of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), became the chief minister of Haryana two years ago, his regime was expected to carry the parivar imprint.
But few had envisaged a government packed with men owing allegiance to RSS – the ideological mentor of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) – at all levels. Be it the chief minister’s office (CMO) and important positions in government institutions or organisations, the first-time chief minister has appointed persons having strong connections with RSS or affiliated saffron outfits.
The all-powerful CMO is teeming with non-officials appointed as advisers and officers on special duty (OSDs). Most of them are associated with the Sangh Parivar, and enjoy unhindered access and clout. The chief minister seeks their counsel on regular basis. “Whenever he is in Chandigarh, Khattar meets these trusted aides daily, first early in the morning and then before calling it a day,” said a top-ranking IAS officer.


While Capt Bhupinder Singh, OSD to chief minister, is the son of RSS prant sanghchalak Major Kartar Singh (retired), another OSD Raj Kumar Bhardwaj is a former journalist with long association with RSS. Khattar’s media adviser Amit Arya, a former television journalist, political aides Jagdish Chopra and Deepak Mangla and private assistant Abhimanyu also have RSS ties.
Agriculture minister OP Dhankar says it is a government of those associated with RSS. “The CM is from RSS. I am from there. People have given the mandate, knowing full well that we are from RSS. We are not going to appoint people belonging to Congress or Sewa Dal,” he told Hindustan Times.
Haryana agricultural minister OP Dhankar at Haryana Vidhan Sabha in Chandigarh on November 04. (HT Photo)
RSS agenda top priority
But that’s not all. Several key appointments in government organisations have also been made with RSS blessings in line with its agenda – beef ban, cow conservation, Gita, search for the lost river Saraswati, saffronisation of education, etc. RSS ideologue Dinanath Batra, president of the Shiksa Sanskriti Utthan Nyas, was given an important role in formulation of education policy and development of books in the state just days after Khattar took charge while a one-time swayamsevak Jagbir Singh, was appointed chairman of Board of School Education, Haryana in April this year.
Another Sangh loyalist Bhani Ram Mangla heads the Gau Seva Aayog and most members of the commission have either held some position or participated in activities of RSS, Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Bajrang Dal or related outfits. Another pracharak, Rishi Prakash Sharma has been appointed chairman of Haryana Livestock Development Board two months ago. He was vice-chairman of Gau Seva Aayog earlier.
A one-time Khattar aide said that the names of 200-odd trusted people were shortlisted in a meeting of RSS leaders about six months ago and given to the political brass of the state for appointment in different positions. “Don’t be surprised if there are more appointments in the coming months,” said the official with strong parivar connections.


There are also groups like Global Village Foundation, a think-tank of professionals set up by Balram Nandwani of RSS last year, that are active in the state, signing pacts with government organisations in areas education, training, skill upgradation etc. Besides Nandwani, some other GVF members – economist Mukul G Asher, Aniruddha Rajput and Bajrang Lal Bagra — have been given important roles by the state government. SP Gupta, director general, Haryana Institute of Public Administration (HIPA), said there is nothing unusual in such appointments.
“Whenever there is a change in government, every new CM appoints his own people. Those appointed by the government are highly qualified persons. People should object only if there is some doubt about their integrity or if such appointees lack experience or requisite qualifications,” said the retired IAS officer.
These appointments apart, IAS, IPS and other officers have been doing the rounds of parivar leaders for their blessings. “An RSS functionary had last year asked me to suggest the names of some retired officers for appointment in a government organisation. When I suggested the name of a retired bureaucrat, his only query was whether the officer has any Sangh leanings,” recalled a government official, requesting anonymity.

THE RISE OF THE RIGHT IN POWER CIRCLES
The CMO is teeming with non-officials appointed as advisers and many key appointments have been made with RSS blessings

JAGBIR SINGH, chairman, Board of School Education, Haryana: A one-time swayamsevak of RSS, he is an educationist and has been associated with New Lahoria Vidya Mandir School, Hisar. He holds a doctorate degree from Hisar Agriculture University.
PRASHANT BHARDWAJ, deputy chairman, Haryana Saraswati Heritage Development Board: Based in Gurgaon, he has been working with the Saraswati Nadi Shodh Sansthan, set up by Sangh veteran Darshan Lal Jain in 1999, since its inception.
DINANATH BATRA, patron, Guidance Board and Education Advisory Committee: Batra is a one-time RSS pracharak and president of Shiskha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas. He taught Hindi and English at schools in Punjab and Haryana for 30 years.
BALRAM NANDWANI, chairperson, Global Village Foundation, and director, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam: A chartered accountant by profession, he has been closely associated with RSS and Swadeshi Jagran Manch.
BHANI RAM MANGLA, chairman, Gau Seva Aayog: A BJP leader having strong links with RSS, he was president of the BJP district units in Gurgaon and Mewat for seven years. He also headed the Gau-Vansh Vikas Prakosth of the party.
RISHI PRAKASH SHARMA, chairman, Haryana Livestock Development Board: A one-time pracharak of RSS, he has been active in the BJP for many years. He was the returning officer for the organisational polls of the ruling party in the state this year.
JAWAHAR YADAV, chairman, Haryana Housing Board: A former office-bearer of ABVP and associated with RSS, he worked as officer on special duty to Khattar for 16 months. Yadav speaks on behalf of the chief minister and the state government.
CAPT BHUPINDER SINGH, officer on special duty to CM: He is the son of RSS prant sanghchalak Major (retd) Kartar Singh. A swayamsevak, Singh is a former squadron leader of Indian Air Force. He also worked as helicopter pilot in private sector.
AMIT ARYA, media adviser to chief minister: Known to be close to Khattar, he is a former television journalist. He has been associated with ABVP in Haryana and Himachal Pradesh and has strong links in RSS. He belongs to Sonepat.
BHUPENDER KUMAR DHARMANI, state information commissioner: A former Sirsa-based journalist, his association with the Sangh parivar is very old. He was state secretary of ABVP in Himachal Pradesh during his student days.
 
Rivals, officials see design
Though the BJP has been in power in Haryana in coalition with other parties in the past, this is the first time it has formed its own government. The RSS has never had it so good. And its imprint is getting deeper by the day, irking the state bureaucracy and the opposition parties. Congress spokesperson Ran Singh Maan said the Khattar government has become “hostage” to RSS.
“The appointments have been made at the instance of RSS and many of those appointed do not belong to the state or not know enough about it. As a result, governance is suffering,” he said.
But Haryana Housing Board chairman Jawahar Yadav, who often speaks on behalf of Khattar, dismissed the talk of RSS calling the shots, accusing the Congress of raking up non-issues to divert attention from its failures and bankruptcy of ideas. “We are all from RSS. Is it a crime to be associated with it? It is obvious that we will induct people with Sangh background and not those from the Congress,” he said.
While other opposition parties such as INLD and AAP are also critical of such appointments, the state bureaucracy also seems to be bearing the brunt of the political top brass’ dependence on “non-officials” and frequent transfers of officials. Over the past two years, the government has ordered over 200 transfers of IAS officers. Not surprisingly, the trust quotient between bureaucrats and the political bosses is not high.

October 28, 2016

India: Central govt officers’ meeting with RSS chief - MP High Court issues fresh notices

newsbits.in


Central govt officers’ meeting with RSS chief: MP High Court issues fresh notices
Mohan Bhagwat RSS government officers political activities mayor elections Jabalpur MP High Court

Senior Correspondent

NewsBits.in

Bhopal: The MP High Court has taken a stern stand in context of a petition that objected to the government of India (GoI) officers posted in MP meeting the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat at Jabalpur in a run up to the local mayoral election last year (2015).

On Wednesday, a division bench of acting Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice Anjuli Palo issued fresh notices to central government and new notices to its three departments including the railways, provident fund office and telecommunications, seeking reply in one month's time.

The divisional railway manager, the general manager of telecom and the local PF commissioner had met RSS chief Bhagwat at his local accommodation at the latter’s summon in context of the Jabalpur mayoral elections.

The president of Democratic Lawyers’ Forum OP Yadav had filed a petition seeking action against the officials.

Initially, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat was made a respondent in the case, but his name was deleted suo motu by the High Court.

The petitioner’s lawyer Ravindra Gupta told NewsBits.in that during a previous hearing about eight months ago, the central government had said that it had sought replies from the three departments concerned, but is yet to file the replies.

On Wednesday, the court took a stern view of this delay and issued separate notices to these departments. Also a fresh notice was issued to GoI seeking its reply on the issue of participation of government officials in political activities.

Gupta said that he put before the court that according to civil conduct rules of the GoI, central government officials cannot participate in political activities and there was a standing circular banning government employees becoming members of organizations like RSS and Jamat-e-Islami.

“We have sought through the petition that the central government should issue clear guidelines in this context,” Gupta said.

(Image courtesy: Samvada.org)

July 14, 2016

India under Modi Govt: Hindu mythology driving naming of state projects -- 'Sankat Mochan' is the name of the operation to evacuate Indians from South Sudan

The Times of India

VK Singh leads operation 'Sankat Mochan' to evacuate Indians from South Sudan
TNN | Jul 14, 2016

NEW DELHI: India on Thursday sent two C-17 military transport aircraft to war-torn South Sudan 's capital city Juba to evacuate over 300 Indians stranded there.

Minister of state for external affairs VK Singh is leading the operation, named "Sankat Mochan", to evacuate Indians from South Sudan, which has been rocked by violence that has claimed hundreds of lives.

Singh is accompanied by by Amar Sinha, secretary (economic relations) in the external affairs ministry, joint secretary Satbir Singh and director Anjani Kumar.

"We will make all possible efforts to bring back safely all Indian nationals who are stranded in Sudan," Gen VK Singh said before his departure. [. . .]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/VK-Singh-leads-operation-Sankat-Mochan-to-evacuate-Indians-from-South-Sudan/articleshow/53202625.cms

July 13, 2016

India: RSS Mukt Bharat - a political campign explained (1966 law reiterated in 1975 and 1980 required civil servants to declare that they are not affiliated to either Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) or Jamaat-e-Islami - That law is under threat of repeal)

via sabrangindia.in
Date: June 13, 2016 to June 30, 2019

Home page image: Dailyo



Ravi Nair       Tapan Bose    Teesta Setalvad

Two days ago, the Times of India reported that the Modi regime is all set to repeal 1966 law, reiterated subsequently in 1975 and 1980, requiring those joining government service, to declare that they are not affiliated to either Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) or Jamaat-e-Islami.

This design or model, implemented already in BJP-run states like Gujarat, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh subverts governance at the very basic level, affecting the neutraility of the civil services.

An RSS-ridden civil service cannot work, that is implement, a secular constitution. For, ‘it is perfectly possible to pervert the constitution, without changing its form, by merely changing the form of the administration and to [sic] make it inconsistent and opposed to the spirit of the constitution’.

The parliamentary system is based on a professional, politically neutral civil service. The RSS is embarked on a major exercise to subvert the present constitutional order.

Hence this Campaign


The news report in The Times of India also stated that the department of personnel and training now plans to hold consultations with the home ministry on the need to do away with this "unreasonable and absurd" norm, with a senior government functionary pointing out how RSS had always maintained that "it is a cultural and non-political organisation". This will be part of the government's drive to repeal defunct and archaic laws.  "The present government has not issued this circular (on debarring RSS members from taking up government jobs). It does not expect anybody joining government service to declare whether or not heshe is a member of RSS," minister of state Jitendra Singh told TOI last Thursday, June 9.

This present move, it is reported, to withdraw the standing order issued in 1966 after Indira Gandhi assumed office as PM, and reiterated in 1980 and 1975, when RSS was banned -comes after reports that a central government department had cited it to ask new recruits in Goa to declare they didn't belong to RSS. According to the 1966 order, anyone who holds membership of RSS or Jamaat-e-Islami would not qualify for any central government job. However, the order was not followed strictly and these facts came to light recently with the Goa episode. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and home minister Rajnath Singh and other Union ministers have always taken pride in their primary allegience to RSS.

It may be reassuring for some to hear that Narendra Modi, a RSS pracharak, first and foremost, recently said in his much lauded speech to the US Congress, that “the Indian Constitution is a holy book”. Though he occupies a prime Constitutional position at present, his grooming was in an organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) that views the Indian Constitution with ambivalence at best and antipathy at worst.

Rejecting the modern foundation of Bharat as laid down in Article 1 of the Indian Constitution, one of the foundational documents of the Sangh, Bunch of Thoughts by MS Golwalkar (at Page 119), rejects and debunks ‘the absurdity of the concept of territorial nationalism’.  Golwalkar says, “They (we presume by this the RSS means the Leaders in the Constituent Assembly) forgot that here was already a full-fledged ancient nation of the Hindus and the various communities which were living in the country were here either as guests, the Jews and Paris, or as invaders, the Muslim and Christians. They never faced the question how all such heterogeneous groups could be called as children of the soil merely because, by an accident, they happened to reside in a common territory under the rule of a common enemy. ”

The  RSS is also unashamed about its Aim: Overturn the Constitutional Mandate:
“....We have been sufficiently fooled uptil now by their exhortation that we Hindus, who are having a great philosophy of human brotherhood, catholicity of spirit and so on, should not narrow ourselves by the talk of Hindu Nationalism and all such 'communal', 'medieval' and 'reactionary' ideas! We must be able to see through the game and revert to the truth of our nationalism as an ancient fact and the Hindus being the national society of Bharat, so clearly restated by our revered founder when he decided the word 'Rashtriya' for our organisation. We must once again stand up in our true and full stature and boldly assert that we shall elevate the Hindu National Life in Bharat to the peak of glory and honour which has been its birthright since hoary time. (Page 127, Bunch of Thoughts, MS Golwalkar)

Importantly, on April 27, 1948, Vallabhbhai Patel, India’s first home minister,  in a letter to prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, said: “I need hardly emphasise that an efficient, disciplined and contented service … is a sine qua non of sound administration under a democratic regime even more than under an authoritarian rule. The service must be above party and we should ensure that political consider­ations either in its recruitment or in its discipline and control, are reduced to the minimum, if not eliminated altogether.”An RSS-ridden civil service cannot work a secular constitution. For, “it is perfectly possible to pervert the constitution, without changing its form, by merely changing the form of the administration and to [sic] make it inconsistent and opposed to the spirit of the constitution”.


Given the over moves to severely affect the neutrality of the civil service, a Platform for Constitutional Rights has been launched. We invite one and all to become part of the campaign

This is the first of a series of information sheets produced in English and Hindi for public dissemination and education. If you would like to translate them in other languages, please do contact us on the email given below.
platform.constirights@gmail.com (link sends e-mail), sabrangind@gmail.com (link sends e-mail)
 

Information sheet no 1
Building an RSS Free India

Mr. Nitish Kumar, the Chief Minister of Bihar has correctly called for a RSS free India (Sangh Mukht Bharat). It cannot remain a slogan and pious aspiration. This first information sheet of a series puts forward what non BJP ruled states should do as Governmental policies towards creating a Sangh Mukht Bharat. This will be followed by others on what you as a citizen can do.

Campaign for an RSS Mukt Bharat
There is no political stream with perhaps the exception of the Maoists and a few Muslim political organisations that have not consorted directly or indirectly with the RSS at some point of time since 1947. This needed to be said as very few come with clean hands on helping the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its front organisations knowingly or unknowingly to spread its tentacles. This hydra headed monster is now doing the back seatdriving in India.  They are steering India towards a Hindutva authoritarian state.The best international analogy would be the white racist Afrikaner-Broederbond, a secretive organisation that orchestrates white racist political activity in South Africa since 1918.

The average Hindu on the street needs to be educated on the difference between being a Hindu and Hindutva as the RSS deviously seeks to conflate the two.    Their protestations of loyalty todemocratic norms are as spurious as those made by Adolf Hitler to the Weimar Republic and Constitution.

This is not an attempt to regurgitate the history of the mendacity of an organization that was universally reviled after the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi.  These information sheets seek to provide a road map of how to start a concerted fight back by those who believe in the 1950 constitution of India and will do all that is necessary to protect it.



On April 27, 1948, Vallabhbhai Patel, India’s first home minister,  in a letter to prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, said: “I need hardly emphasise that an efficient, disciplined and contented service … is a sine qua non of sound administration under a democratic regime even more than under an authoritarian rule. The service must be above party and we should ensure that political consider­ations either in its recruitment or in its discipline and control, are reduced to the minimum, if not eliminated altogether.”



What the State and Central Government and its departments should do?
Every state government which has a non Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government must strictly enforce the provisions of The Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 which clearly state.Provisions of The Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964

“(12) R.S.S. and Jamaat-e-Islami – participation by the Government servants in the activities of The attention of the Ministry of Finance etc., is invited to the provisions of sub-rule (1) of Rule 5 of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 under which no Government servant shall be a member of, or be otherwise associated with, any political party or any organization which takes part in politics nor shall he take part in, subscribe in aid of, or assist in any other manner, any political movement or activity.

2. As certain doubts have been raised about Government’s policy with respect to the membership of any participation in the activities of the Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh and the Jamaat-e-Islami by Government servants, it is clarified that Government have always held the activities of these two organizations to be of such a nature that participation in them by Government servants would attract the provisions of sub-rule (1) of Rule 5 of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rule, 1964. Any Government servant, who is a member of or is otherwise associated with the aforesaid organizations or with their activities is liable to disciplinary action. [MHA OM No. 3/10/(S)/66-Ests.(B), dated 30.11.1966]

(12A) Reference decision (12) above, it is requested that –
(a) the provisions thereof may be brought to the notice of all Government servants again; and
(b) action should invariably be initiated against any Government servant who comes to notice for violation of the instructions referred to above.
[MHA OM No. 7/4/70-Est.(B), dated 25.07.1970]

(12B) Attention of the various Ministries is also drawn to this Ministry’s OM No. 3/10/(S)/66-Estt.(B) dated the 30th November, 1966 wherein it was clarified that the Government have always held the activities of both the Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh and the Jammat-e-Islami to be of such a nature that participation in them by Government servants would attract the provision of sub-rule (1) of Rule 5 of the Central Civil Service (Conduct) Rules, 1964 and that, any Government servant, who is a member of or is otherwise associated with the aforesaid organizations or with their activities, is liable to disciplinary action.

2. In the context of the current situation in the country the need to ensure secular outlook on the part of Government servants is all the more important. The need to eradicate communal feelings and communal bias cannot be over-emphasized.

3. No notice should be taken by Government and its officers, local bodies, state-aided institutions of petitions or representations on communal basis, and no patronage whatsoever should be extended to any communal organization.

4. Ministry of Finance etc., are therefore, requested to specially bring once against to the notice of all Government employees, working in or under them, the above-quoted provisions in para 1 on the subject. It is emphasized that any disregard of these instructions should be considered as a serious act of indiscipline and suitable action initiated against the erring employees. [DP & AR OM No. 15014/3/(S)/80-Estt. (B), dated 28.10.1980]”[1]

At the Central Government level, all Secretaries to the Government of India are bound by their constitutional oath to enforce the Central Civil Service Conduct Rules.

Already, the Chhattisgarh state government has come up with a notification that permits its employees to join the RSS and attend its shakhas for indoctrination in the Hindutva agenda. The order was issued on the 23 February 2015. The notification states, that “as far as Rule 5 (1) of Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Conduct) Rules 1965 is concerned, its restriction does not apply to RSS.”[2]

In 2000, when the NDA government was in power at the centre, Mr. Keshubhai Patel, then Chief Minister of Gujarat lifted the ban on participation by Government employees in the activities of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.[3]

The BJP state Governments in Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh issued similar notifications in 2004 and 2006. The Central leadership of the Congress Party must ensure that their state government in Simla must revoke the earlier BJP Government order. [4]

The attempt by the BJP to portray the RSS as an apolitical organisation and as a cultural outfit requires a willing suspension of disbelief. The RSS directly takes part in the electoral process. It sends its  pracharaks (full-time propagandists) to the BJP for party work. These pracharaks maintain their links with the RSS and act as a bridge between the RSS and the Bharatiya Janata Party. Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari, Rajnath Singh, and many others are RSS pracharaks. [5]

The RSS has the last word  in the BJP's affairs - in determining the party's office-bearers, in the choice of candidates for elections etc.  RSS leaders do not directly take part in public election campaign meetings, but they are always hovering around behind the curtains. Sangh activists have been central to the BJP's campaign network. Moreover, RSS leaders air their views on political issues regularly.

“The restrictions placed in the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules were meant to prevent civil servants from associating themselves even remotely with political organisations or functions. Of course, civil servants are free to vote in elections, attend public meetings organised by political parties, and listen to political leaders. The Centre had clarified in 1969 that the restrictions in the CCS (C) Rules were essential to ensure that government servants not only maintained political neutrality, but were seen to be doing so and that they did not participate in the activities of, or associate themselves with, any organisation in respect of which there was the slightest reason to think that it had a political aspect.

In 1980, the Centre reiterated its decision not to permit civil servants to participate in the activities of the RSS and the Jamaat-e-Islami. ‘In the context of the current situation in the country, the need to ensure secular outlook on the part of government servants is all the more important. The need to eradicate communal feelings and communal bias cannot be overemphasized,’ the Government said.”[6]

“On April 27, 1948, Vallabhbhai Patel wrote a letter to Jawaharlal Nehru: ‘I need hardly emphasise that an efficient, disciplined and contented service … is a sine qua non of sound administration under a democratic regime even more than under an authoritarian rule. The service must be above party and we should ensure that political consider­ations either in its recruitment or in its discipline and control, are reduced to the minimum, if not eliminated altogether.’

An RSS-ridden civil service cannot work a secular constitution. For, ‘it is perfectly possible to pervert the constitution, without changing its form, by merely changing the form of the administration and to [sic] make it inconsistent and opposed to the spirit of the constitution’.The parliamentary system is based on a professional, politically neutral civil service. The RSS is embarked on a major exercise to subvert the present constitutional order.

Former UP chief minister Kalyan Singh said in 2000: ‘I have spent a greater part of my life in [the RSS] and I can say that right from the distribution of election tickets … in BJP to selecting cabinet ministers, it is only the RSS which calls the shots. What else is political activity?’ ”[7]
The attempt by the BJP to portray the RSS as an apolitical organisation and as a cultural outfit requires a willing suspension of disbelief. The RSS directly takes part in the electoral process. It sends its  pracharaks (full-time propagandists) to the BJP for party work. These pracharaks maintain their links with the RSS and act as a bridge between the RSS and the Bharatiya Janata Party. Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari, Rajnath Singh, and many others are RSS pracharaks



What is to be done?

All non BJP Governments must require all employees of all departments to take a public pledge in a general assembly in their place of work that their loyalty is only the present constitution of India.  This can be also done by requiring each employee to sign a written pledge. A format for the pledge is available on request.

All state government departments must present a report to the Chief Minister of the state about frontal organisations of the RSS and their offshoots who receive subsidies or grants from the State exchequer. Immediate steps be taken to stop funding these organizations. All this information to be made available on a public website.

A nodal officer to be appointed in the Chief Minister’s secretariat to receive complaints from the general public about any government official attending shakhas, serving on boards or committees of RSS frontal organisations. Immediate suspension to be followed by strict action under the Civil Service rules be taken against all such employees.

The State Education departments constitute a committee of well-known educationists to review all the text books and teaching material in government schools, government aided schools and government recognised schools to remove all material that fosters and inculcates communal and sectarian feelings and thought.

A panel of legal professionals be constituted to check on the applicability of section 153 A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) on such violations of the law in each and every case, investigations to be conducted expeditiously and charge sheetsbe filed within 90 days of the intimation of such violations of the law.

A special court in each state to be constituted to try such cases. All trials to be conducted on a day to day basis. No adjournments to be provided under any circumstances.

All State Governments to strictly enforce Section 2 sub section C of The Arms Act 1959 and ban the usage of lathis, knives and swords in all public displays of the RSS and its front organisations like the Bajrang Dal in the regular shakhas, their training camps and their public worship of arms on Vijaya Dashmi day every year. The District Magistrates should also take recourse to Sections 141 to 148 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).[8][9]

This is not an exhaustive list but illustrative. We welcome other suggestions.
Ravi Nair, Tapan Bose, platform.constirights@gmail.com (link sends e-mail)
Teesta Setalvad, teestateesta@gmail.com (link sends e-mail)
Dr Sunilam, samajwadisunilam@gmail.com (link sends e-mail)




References:
[1] “The Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964”
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)
[2] “Chattisgarh: Government staff may join RSS; no service rules under violation”; Indian Express, Raipur, 26 February 2015
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)
[3]“Beyond a Ban”; Frontline, Volume 17-Issue 02, January 22-February 04, 2000
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)
[4]“Chattisgarh: Government staff may join RSS; no service rules under violation”; Indian Express, Raipur, 26 February 2015
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)
[5] For Example: “ At RSS Review Meet, Top ministers make presentations”; NDTV, New Delhi, 4 September 2015
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)
[6] “Disturbing Polemics”; Frontline, New Delhi, Volume 17, Issue 4, February 19-March 3, 2000
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)
[7] “RSS legitimized”; Dawn, October 18, 2014
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)
[8]Arms Act, 1959- Section 2 (c)
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)
 [9] Indian Penal Code, Section 141-148
(Last visited on June 13, 2016)

July 06, 2016

India: Modi Govt Reshuffle Nine out of 20 the ministers upgraded and inducted today are from the RSS

The Telegraph - 6 July 2016

Sangh score 9 out of 20
Radhika Ramaseshan

New Delhi, July 5: Nine out of 20 - or 45 per cent - of the ministers upgraded and inducted today are from the RSS.

Notwithstanding the RSS's insistence that it is "apolitical" and "does not have anything to do with the BJP or the central government" - its spokespersons make this claim all the time - BJP president Amit Shah went to the Sangh headquarters here last night with the list of ministers and secured its ratification before the names were "informally" passed on to the media.

In the lead-up to finalising the inductions, Shah was either in touch with RSS leaders himself or updated them through BJP general secretary (organisation) Ramlal.

Prakash Javadekar, promoted as cabinet minister, is a professed RSS " swayamsevak" and an "active" participant in the Ram temple "agitation". The junior ministers associated with the Sangh parivar are: Faggan Singh Kulaste, Vijay Goel, Anil Madhav Dave, Jasnwantsinh Bhabhor, Mahendra Nath Pandey, Mansukh Mandaviya, Parshottam Rupala and P.P. Chaudhary.

Kulaste and Bhabhor, tribals from Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat, worked for the Sangh's Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram. Kulaste was part of a movement advocating an end to reservations for those tribals who had converted to Christianity. Chaudhary, a Rajasthan MP, became an RSS "swayamsevak" at eight.

Dave, a former pracharak, worked hard to please the RSS by organising the Vaicharik Kumbh, an ideological conclave, on the sidelines of the Simhasta Kumbha Mela in Ujjain in May.

March 10, 2016

India: Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's proximity to BJP’s Modi Govt and danger of growing influence of religious cults on governments | Jyotirmaya Sharma

The Wire, 10 March 2016

Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and the Pathology of New Age Cults

The need to ease out the influence of New Age gurus is more immediate than ever. Otherwise, the stranglehold of religious cults on governments would become a reality sooner than later.

Reflecting the BJP's proximity to Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, the Modi government has given a grant of over Rs 2 crore for the Art of Living foundation's 'world cultural forum' on the Yamuna river bed near Delhi. Credit: PTI Photo by Kamal Kishore
Reflecting the BJP’s proximity to Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, the Modi government has given a grant of over Rs 2 crore for the Art of Living foundation’s ‘world cultural forum’ on the Yamuna river bed near Delhi. Credit: PTI Photo by Kamal Kishore
In March 2001, I wrote a piece in a national daily I used to then work for arguing that there was no essential difference between the Taliban’s felling of the Bamiyan Buddha and the destruction of the Babri masjid in India. For every Mullah Muhammad Omar in Afghanistan, there is a corresponding Giriraj Kishore.
Soon after the piece was published, I received a request from Sri Sri Ravi Shankar through a disciple for a conversation on this very issue. I was told that the popular New Age guru was upset and perplexed by my speaking of the Bamiyan Buddha and the Babri masjid in the same breath.
I met him in Delhi and we spoke for nearly an hour (all through which Sri Sri ran his fingers in a large bowl of dry fruit, neither eating any nor offering it to me). There was total asymmetry between our perspectives and we agreed to disagree. I failed to impress upon him that slavery to historical memory can lead to a spiral of recriminations and fuel the desire to settle scores endlessly. Both acts, contemporary as they are, are born out of cynical politics and the desire to divide people and rule on the basis of such a division.
The godman kept repeating the fact that the mosque in Ayodhya was built after destroying a temple and so it fell into another category than the Bamiyan Buddha. For me the impulse to destroy the Bamiyan Buddha and the Babri mosque came from the same seed of intolerance and fear of diversity and complexity with little or no difference separating the two.
Camouflaging sectarian identities
Of course, there has been a proliferation of new age Hindu gurus in recent years, where the tag of “new age” manages to camouflage their otherwise apparent sectarian identities. They manage to hide behind the indeterminate label of “world religions” and this label releases them from immediate identification with any narrow sectarian affiliation. Their stress on singing, dancing and being happy, and doctrinal fast food such as “smiling” and “love” endears them to the burgeoning “I, me, myself” middle class in India, especially the young. This escape from any serious doctrinal discussion helps justify and legitimate hedonism and mindless consumerism. They help concretise a world where guilt is someone else’s bad karma and good karma is the pursuit of unbridled gratification, including the misplaced greed for spirituality.
These new age gurus offer to Hindus a simplified, non- threatening and pre-digested doctrine that is founded on a peculiar kind of interpretation of advaita Vedanta, made popular in India since the nineteenth century. This is akin to an overripe banana that looks solid from the outside but is essentially gooey from the inside. It takes the form of endless prattle about the oneness of the universe and the universality of the Brahman. Add to this yoga, meditation and ayurveda and the picture gets completed. The latter are touted as part of the great eternal and abiding legacy of their version of the great Hindu civilisation and their popularity elsewhere helps integration with Western modernity and concepts of progress.
More significantly, almost all of these new age cults and gurus are recruitment centres for the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and the Sangh parivar. Put differently, the RSS has outsourced its putative recruitment to these new age cults. The RSS and the Sangh parivar realise that no amount of sartorial changes will help correct their regressive image. What the new age cults manage for them is to keep the Indian middle class within the Hindu nationalist fold by echoing the preoccupations of this class. Therefore, these cults also have a subtle way of speaking about India’s military glory, how true gentleness lies in strength, the dream of India as a superpower, the impediments in the way of economic growth (namely, communists, secularists and Muslims) and how missionaries, alternate lifestyles, heterodox ideas, creative literature, poetry and modern art have worked to tarnish India (which is Hindu in their scheme of things) and its glories in the eyes of the world.
Perniciously banal
Founder of Art of Living Foundation Sri Sri Ravi Shankar addresses entrepreneurs at the 'Happening Haryana Global Investors Summit 2016' in Gurgaon on Tuesday. Credit: PTI
Founder of Art of Living Foundation Sri Sri Ravi Shankar addresses entrepreneurs at the ‘Happening Haryana Global Investors Summit 2016’ in Gurgaon on Tuesday. Credit: PTI
Equally serious are the banalities offered day in and day out. The more popular among these are “the same god is in all of us” and the “same essence permeates us all”. In that sense, they reduce all other faiths and their followers to nothingness and rob them of any specific cultural identity they might have cherished, besides being extremely condescending to other faiths. In all of this, the new age gurus manage to impress upon their followers that this benign doctrine flows from Hinduism and that its customary tolerance is what accounts for this seeming generosity.
The only counter to these pernicious doctrines is the celebration of politics, democracy, liberalism and plurality in letter and in spirit. Genuine democracy is the greatest enemy of these regressive tendencies. The way politicians have vitiated the public sphere in recent years leads to the spectacle of a godman entering the public arena to solve an issue that is primarily political. Whether this is done in a public capacity or in a private one is an issue that ought to be thoroughly debated and any such future efforts ought to be shunned. Neither the Shankaracharya nor new age gurus have any business to meddle in political issues. They neither have the legitimacy nor the authority. They are not part of the formal political process and are to be kept out of the public realm. Of course, godmen too are citizens of this country but they no longer are sole representatives of their faiths. Hence, to ask the Kanchi Acharya to negotiate a settlement of the Babri masjid-Ram mandir dispute is patently unfair to those Hindus who do not look up to him as their spiritual leader.
New age gurus represent an even smaller, though powerful, number of people, who are ensconced in their pretty enclaves with little to do with the rest of India. The  need to ease out their influence cults is more immediate than ever. Otherwise, there will be a repeat of Gujarat elsewhere and the stranglehold of religious cults on governments would become a reality sooner than later.
There is much to do in India and godmen can lend a helping hand. Most of them do so, but restrict it largely to indoctrinating future generations of young men and women to be less Indian and more Hindu, Muslim or Christian. There is no one art of living, but there is a staggering plurality of ways in which we might live. The most ordinary Indian instinctively understands this as long as he doesn’t fall prey to divisive ideologies or restrictive cults. One of these many ways of living and living well is to revel in the noise and chaos of democracy, as spiritual and as sacred for some of us as a holy text, a godman, or even a pilgrimage.
Jyotirmaya Sharma teaches politics at the University of Hyderabad and is the author of Hindutva: Exploring the Idea of Hindu Nationalism and, most recently, Cosmic Love and Human Apathy: Swami Vivekananda’s Restatement of Religion.
A version of this article was first published by Mail Today in June 2008.

February 12, 2016

An Open Letter to Delhi Chief Minister - Keep Religion Out of Government - Dont Fund a Religious Ritual like 'Saraswati Puja' with Tax payer's Money

Chief Minister of Delhi
Delhi Government Secretariat
IG Indoor Stadium, ITO, Vikram Nagar, New Delhi-110002
Email: cmdelhi@nic.in

Dear Arvind Kejriwal Saheb

Aadab Arz Hai!

I am writing to you after having seen public announcements and news report announcing the holding of a Delhi govt sponsored public event in the form of 'Saraswati Puja' on 13 February 2016 in the Central Park of Connought Place in Delhi. Sir i would like express my open opposition toward the use of public money for hosting a religious ceremony in a public Park. As a citizen of Delhi i feel a secular government's hard earned funds from the taxpayer should be used for universal public good but where religion is kept out and best left to the private entities and believers.

On the one hand, the Aam Aadmi Party government has shown encouraging inclinations in the defence of secularism and observing even-handedness in its defence of minorities of various hues. It has put its foot down, for example, when Delhi churches were being vandalised by saffron goons; it has set up an Special Investigation Team (SIT) to go into the 1984 anti-Sikh massacres; it was prompt in investigating anti-Muslim violence in Haryana where it produced a useful report, pinning blame on the BJP government in the state. And who can deny that your AAP led the juggernaut stalled the Modi wave that had threatened to swamp the country.

I am therefore, surprised and dismayed seeing that a Saraswati Pooja is being officially hosted by the AAP govt in Delhi. Your govt. should be a trend setter in promoting sponsoring activities to inculcate scientific temper in our very obscurantist and superstitious society; Delhi govt should assure all delhi walas that their freedom of religion is respected by their government but it will not fund religious activity using official funds.

salutations

your sincerely

Harsh Kapoor
[a chaddi free citizen]

September 27, 2015

India: Goa government funding "extremist" Sanatan Sanstha, says AAP (PTI report on The Economic Times)

The Economic Times

Goa government giving financial support to "extremist" Sanatan Sanstha, says AAP

The Sanatan has come under the scanner after its activist Samir Gaikwad was arrested in connection with the murder of rationalist Govind Pansare.
The Sanatan has come under the scanner after its activist Samir Gaikwad was arrested in connection with the murder of rationalist Govind Pansare.
PANAJI: Goa unit of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) today alleged that the state government was providing financial support to the "extremist and dubious" organisation Sanatan Sanstha, by giving advertisements to its mouthpiece.

The Sanatan Sanstha has come under the scanner after its activist Samir Gaikwad was arrested in connection with the murder of CPI leader and rationalist Govind Pansare.

"It is shocking to note that Goa government is officially handing over public money to such a radical organisation through its mouthpiece 'Sanathan Prabhat'," Valmiki Naik, ad-hoc secretary of AAP in Goa said.

"AAP strongly condemns this financial support given to this extremist organisation under the guise of newspaper advertisements," he added.

The government should immediately stop releasing a single rupee of public money to such dubious organisations, and also put an immediate ban on its mouthpiece the Sanathan Prabhat, while beginning active monitoring of all activities of the Sanstha, Naik said.

"AAP Goa also demands that the Home Ministry should obtain a copy of the 2011 dossier of the Maharasthra Government, and completes a time-bound NIA-assisted probe into the organisation under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act and submit a fresh request to the Centre to ban the Sanathan Sanstha, without leaving any loopholes in its report for the BJP-led central government to deny the request," he said.

The Maharashtra Home Ministry had, in 2011 sent a detailed report to the Central government and had requested it to ban the Sanatan Sanstha, though the government did not act upon it, former Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan had recently said.

Naik further said, "It is with dismay that AAP Goa notes the active support given by the Goa government to Sanatan Sanstha. While individual support by Goa Ministers such as Sudin Dhavalikar and Deepak Dhavalikar is deplorable, but it is not entirely surprising due to their known narrow-minded and regressive opinions on various issues."

The AAP leader also alleged that Chief Minister Laxmikant Parsekar remains oblivious, or pretends to be oblivious, of simple facts when conveniently stating that an organisation cannot be banned due to the actions of one person, in reference to the recent arrest of Samir Gaikwad.

September 26, 2015

India: It’s hard to reconcile the oath of ministerial office with what the RSS stands for (Shamsul Islam)

The Indian Express - September 26, 2015

The unmaking of India
It’s hard to reconcile the oath of ministerial office with what the RSS stands for

Written by Shamsul Islam

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat (centre) greets Home Minister and BJP leader Rajnath Singh during a function in Delhi. (PTI file photo)

While defending interactions between the RSS and the BJP in these columns (‘A family gets together’, September 15), Ram Madhav makes two important points. First, that such interactions are normal. According to him, several organisations interact with government in a democracy, “then why an objection in this case?” But the issue is not that simple.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his ministers have taken oaths to safeguard a democratic, secular Indian polity. But the “big and popular” RSS is not committed to this ideal. Documents from the RSS archives tell a shocking story with which Madhav must be familiar.

When the Constituent Assembly finalised the Constitution in November 1949, the RSS’s Organiser (November 30, 1949) in an editorial demanded that the Manusmriti be made the Constitution of India. It read: “But in our Constitution there is no mention of the unique constitutional development in ancient Bharat… To this day… [Manu’s] laws, as enunciated in the Manusmriti, excite the admiration of the world and elicit spontaneous obedience and conformity. But to our constitutional pundits that means nothing”.

The RSS is allergic to democracy. M.S. Golwalkar, the most prominent ideologue of the organisation, while delivering a speech at the RSS Resham Bagh headquarters in Nagpur in 1940, demanded that India be governed by “one flag, one leader and one ideology of Hindutva”.

We need to know from Madhav, who is learning from whom. If the RSS is the “ideological fountainhead” of the parivar’s 40-plus organisations, which includes the BJP, then surely the days of a democratic, secular India are numbered.

Madhav’s second point is that “the RSS neither controls nor commands” these 40-plus organisations. According to him, “in a very Indian familial way, they come together occasionally to discuss and exchange notes”. We need to go back to Guruji Golwalkar to understand how the RSS manipulates politics. Addressing a gathering of top RSS cadres on March 16, 1954, at Sindi, Wardha, he said: “If we say that we are part of the organisation and accept its discipline, then selectiveness has no place in life. Do what is told. If told to play kabaddi, play kabaddi; told to hold meeting then meeting… For instance, some of our friends were told to go and work for politics, that does not mean that they have great interest or inspiration for it. They don’t die for politics like fish without water. If they are told to withdraw from politics, then also there is no objection. Their discretion is just not required.”

Long after the establishment of the Bharatiya Jan Sangh, he reiterated this “familial way” while addressing state/ regional-level RSS pracharaks at Indore on March 5, 1960, in the following words: “We know this also that some of our swayamsevaks work in politics. There, they have to organise according to the needs of work public meetings, processions etc, have to raise slogans. All these things have no place in our work. However, like the character in a play, whatever role has been assigned should be portrayed with best of capability. But sometimes, swayam sevaks go beyond the role assigned to a performer (nat) as they develop overzealousness in their hearts, to the extent that they become useless for this work. This is not good.”

Madhav’s comment that after the recent RSS-BJP conclave, the “ideological family went home content with the general direction of the country under the new government” is cause for concern. It means that the Modi government, committed to a democratic, secular India, is being influenced by forces that are inimical to India as we know it.

The writer taught political science at the University of Delhi

September 17, 2015

India: Shame on You, Mr. Culture Minister . . .

The Wire - 17 September 2015

Shame on You, Mr. Culture Minister
By Siddharth Varadarajan

Mahesh Sharma’s utterances about Muslims, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and other matters are not casual off-the-cuff remarks; they have to be seen in the context of the guidance provided by the RSS to the government

Union Minister for Tourism & Culture Mahesh Sharma being offered sweets as he unveils a 365 kg jumbo laddoo to celebrate Prime Minister Narendra Modi's birthday at FICCI Auditorium in New Delhi on Thursday. Credit: PTI

Union Minister for Tourism & Culture Mahesh Sharma being offered sweets as he unveils a 365 kg jumbo laddoo to celebrate Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s birthday at FICCI Auditorium in New Delhi on Thursday. Credit: PTI

“Despite being a Muslim”, APJ Abdul Kalam “was a great nationalist and humanist.”

With these shocking words – uttered casually at the end of an interview to India Today TV a few days ago – Union Minister of Culture Mahesh Sharma has not only insulted all Indian Muslims but also the former President of India.

The minister was asked about the controversy over the renaming of Aurangzeb Road in New Delhi. He defended the decision by noting that the Mughal ruler was not someone that people considered ideal and then added,

“Aurangzeb Road ka nam bhi badal kar ek aise mahapursh ke naam par kiya hai jo Musalman hotey hue bhi itna bada rashtravaadi aur manavtavadi insaan tha – APJ Abdul Kalam, unke naam par kiya gaya hai.”

(The name of Aurangzeb Road has been changed to the name of a great human being who, despite being a Muslim, was such a great nationalist and humanist – APJ Abdul Kalam, we have named it after him)

Just in case Sharma claims I am distorting his words or quoting them out of context, here is the video clip from the channel (watch from 16’16’’):

https://youtu.be/qRBKJS8_q0Q?t=16m16s

So now that we have established that the minister actually said what he said, and that the context in which those hateful words were uttered provides him no alibi or escape route, let us consider what they tell us – about Mahesh Sharma the individual; about the Narendra Modi government in which he serves as an important minister; and about the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the organisation he swears allegiance to and which he describes as “nationalist”.

Bigotry plain and simple

The first thing we can say is that Sharma, for all his moralising, is a garden variety bigot who does not believe Indian Muslims are really Indian. If you are a BJP supporter and believe the minister said nothing offensive, substitute the words “Hindu” for “Muslim” and “Atal Bihari Vajpayee” for “APJ Abdul Kalam” and then see how awful that sentence sounds.

Let us be very clear. Even Kalam – whose popularity the BJP is trying to cash in on by getting a road named after him – must suffer the ignominy of having his patriotic credentials certified in this way by the small-minded men who are running the government. In the Culture Minister’s perverted worldview, being Muslim is a handicap that the former President had to overcome in order to serve the country.

Kalam was an extraordinary man – a scientist and administrator who was open to embracing the culture and philosophy of others in a way that fewer and fewer Indians of all faiths tend to be these days. There were many handicaps he had to overcome in a life he devoted to his country, such as the poverty he was born into, and the indifference of the Indian system towards providing quality education to its poorer citizens. If at all being Muslim was a handicap, it was because of the ignorance and prejudice he must have encountered along the way from people who questioned where his loyalties lay – and not because his religion made him have any doubts on this account.

Elsewhere in the same interview, Mahesh Sharma makes a pitch for the compulsory teaching of lessons from the Ramayana, Mahabharata and Gita in school but demurs when asked whether the Quran and Bible will be given the same status. This can’t be done, he says, because only the Hindu texts reflect the “atma” or soul of India.

There are many naïve people in India who believe their religion, caste, language or region is superior to others. Some among them might even become MPs and ministers. It is hard to say whether the minister’s belief in the exclusive claims of his religion to the “soul of India” is the folly of a simpleton or the product of cynical majoritarian politics. Either way, how can a person who takes his oath of office on the Constitution of India defame an entire section of citizens in the way Sharma has?

That the Culture Minister has questioned the patriotism of Indian Muslims is bad enough. But there is something else that I find even more disturbing. The reflexive manner in which he uttered his throwaway line – ‘Musalman hotey hue bhi’ – tells us he is not ashamed of airing his bigotry in public, not even at a time when he and his government are already under fire for trying to pursue a communal agenda. It is this unapologetic, brazen assault on the honour of 14% of the population that worries me. I see it as a sign of bad days ahead for India.

Time to go

If at all there is a context to Sharma’s shocking words, it is that they were made soon after he and other ministers attended a conclave organised by the RSS to assess the performance of the Modi government. We know from Ram Madhav that the government’s primary stakeholders – what he coyly calls the “ideological family” – went back to Nagpur “content with the general direction of the country under the new government.”

What that cryptic sentence really means can be judged from the charged-up manner in which the Culture Minister has emerged from this remedial class.

I won’t go into the other ridiculous things Sharma has been saying since the RSS conclave, including his desire to fight against “cultural pollution.” That is a topic we can save for another day. But impugning the Indianness of Indian Muslims – a central part of the RSS’s political agenda since the days of Hedgewar and Golwalkar – is a despicable thing for a minister to do. If Sharma wants to indulge his bigotry, he should resign from the cabinet and do so on his own time.

September 11, 2015

Modi blows his cover – and the loss is India’s (M.K. Bhadrakumar)

Asia Times - September 10, 2015

Modi blows his cover – and the loss is India’s

By M.K. Bhadrakumar

India recently witnessed a strange spectacle of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his cabinet colleagues subjecting themselves to an intense scrutiny by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh or RSS, the Hindu nationalist organization, regarding their ‘performance’ in office.
Narendra Modi with RSS leaders at a function in Ahmedabad in this file photo

Narendra Modi with RSS leaders at a function in Ahmedabad in this file photo

Modi himself used to be an activist of the RSS. But an elaborate charade was kept so far that Modi was in command of the government.

The Indian media has since reported that the RSS eventually gave ‘thumbs up’ to the government after Modi and his cabinet colleagues trooped in to meet the RSS bosses and testified at the hearing on their ‘schemes and achievements’ in the government.

No Indian government has ever been made to look so foolish and diffident.

Why the RSS decided to subject Modi and his cabinet to such a dressing down publicly is anybody’s guess. Perhaps, it was to project the RSS itself as god almighty in the Modi era. But then, it is an open secret that the Hindu fundamentalist groups are calling the shots in the government, penetrating all walks of national life systematically and imposing their agenda.

The upshot of the RSS hearing is that Modi has blown his ‘cover’, which helped him so far as prime minister to create an impression that he is a humanist and a devout follower of Buddhism who viewed with distaste the excesses committed by the Hindu zealots on the minority communities in India such as the attacks on Christian churches.

Under the Modi government, incidents of communal tension involving Hindus and Muslims have sharply increased, according to official statistics. However, observers have generously absolved the prime minister himself of any responsibility in this regard, and are willing to suspend disbelief. The ‘cover’ has now been blown.

The fallout of this on the India-Pakistan relationship can be serious. Obviously, Modi can no longer maintain with credibility his stance that he seeks friendly relations between India and Pakistan.

In fact, following the cross-examination of the government ministers, the RSS spokesmen in their media briefings inter alia brought up the explosive doctrine of ‘Akhand Bharat’ as the guiding principle for the Modi government as regards the India-Pakistan relationship.

Broadly, the RSS’s doctrine is that the great Partition of the subcontinent in 1947, which led to the creation of Pakistan, was an aberration that can still be got undone if only India worked toward such an objective.

Pakistan has always had a lurking suspicion that there is really no daylight possible between Modi and the RSS. What used to be a dark suspicion is now likely to become an article of faith. Pakistan’s advisor to the prime minister on national security Sartaj Aziz (who is the de facto foreign minister) has been quoted as saying Wednesday that in Islamabad’s estimation, the Modi government won the 2014 parliamentary poll on the basis of ‘anti-Pakistan platform’ and has been pursuing the same policy from ‘day one’.

Aziz said, “They (Modi government) want better ties, but on their own terms”.

To be sure, the mutual rhetoric makes the prospect of a resumption of India-Pakistan dialogue a remote possibility. And it should be a safe conclusion that the India-Pakistan normalization will remain elusive as long as the Modi government remains in power.

Do the RSS bigwigs and their wards in the government realize what colossal damage they are causing to India’s national interests? The 31 percent vote share Modi managed to garner in the poll last year to create India’s first ever RSS-run government does not give these people the right to superimpose their sectarian agenda on the entire nation.

India’s national interest lies in creating a peaceful external environment in the immediate neighborhood that enables the country to focus on the development challenge through the narrow corridor of time of the next 15-20 years.

Yet, what India is witnessing is a ratcheting up of tensions in the relations with Pakistan. The past week alone began with India’s army chief General Dalbir Singh shedding his fabulous reputation for being a strong silent soldier of discretion and reserve – presumably, on instructions from the political leadership – to underscore the readiness of the armed forces to wage a ‘swift, short’ war with Pakistan.

It was an incredibly tactless statement to have been made in the present tense climate of bilateral ties with Pakistan. Besides, the brilliant general should certainly know that the only way he could ensure that a war with Pakistan remained ‘swift’ and ‘short’ would be by nuking that country in the dead of the night.

You don’t need a Clausewitz to explain that the ‘kinetics’ of war with Pakistan (nuclear power with bigger arsenal than India’s and with second-strike capability) will ultimately depend on a variety of factors that are way beyond the control of anyone in New Delhi, civilian or military.

Now, it is into this combustible mix of rhetoric that the RSS bosses presented their stark reminder to Pakistan that India has never really reconciled with the creation of that country in 1947.

Unsurprisingly, Pakistan saw dark intentions behind the Indian army chief and the RSS bosses almost simultaneously making such ‘back-to-back’ statements. The Pakistani army chief Gen. Raheel Sharif has since ticked off both his Indian counterpart and the RSS bosses (and by implication the Modi government) with a rebuff.

After what seems a very long time, the Pakistani army chief has spoken about what their version of the ‘unfinished business of Partition’ would be like – plainly put, peace with India and in the region is not possible until the Kashmir issue gets resolved according to the UN resolutions taking into account the wishes of the Kashmiri people.

As for his Indian counterpart’s dire warning, Gen. Sharif was plainly dismissive: “Armed forces of Pakistan are fully capable to deal all types of internal and external threats, may it be conventional or sub-conventional; whether it is cold start or hot start. We are ready!!”

Are we hearing the beating of drum presaging the beginning of another bloody round of ‘low intensity war’ (read vicious cycle of cross-border terrorism), which cost India heavily in human and material treasure? Or, could it be that India and Pakistan are inching toward another full-fledged war? Time only can tell.

Most certainly, people in responsible position should be careful about what they say in public. What Gen. Dalbir Singh said about ‘short, swift’ war was probably fit for a closed-door meeting with the Director-General of Military Operations at the Army Commanders Conference but not as the stuff of grandstanding.

Equally, while the RSS bosses may not be public officials, they happen to be extra-constitutional authorities wielding more power than many erstwhile emperors in India’s medieval history – and they tend to be taken seriously. Simply put, they should know that the notion of ‘Akhand Bharat’ has no place in the 21st century world order.

India is not presenting a convincing picture as a responsible member of the international community when the so-called movers and shakers in the country behave like hollow men.

The point is, India is keen to secure a seat in the UN Security Council as a permanent member on the plea that it wants to contribute to international security and world peace and development. Funnily, yoga, which Modi has begun propagating under the UN auspices for the good of the soul and body of mankind, is itself all about self-control.

And, yet, in its own region, India chooses to preoccupy itself with sly thoughts about waging a ‘swift short’ war with its unfriendly neighbor and harbors delusionary notions of doing away with a sovereign independent nation that came into being 68 years ago.

The Jekyll-and-Hyde split personality does not do good to India’s image. The country would have been far better off if Modi hadn’t blown his ‘cover’ as a humanist and a modernizer.

(Copyright 2015 Asia Times Holdings Limited, a duly registered Hong Kong company. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

September 08, 2015

A dangerous influence: Modi govt under RSS control (Sitaram Yechury)

The Hindustan Times - September 08, 2015

A dangerous influence: Modi govt under RSS control

by Sitaram Yechury

The recent three-day RSS baithak with the prime minister and his Cabinet subjecting themselves to scrutiny of the RSS is a reconfirmation that the BJP is nothing else but the political arm of the RSS. Legitimate questions arose on how ministers sworn under oath to our Constitution are reporting on advancing the RSS agenda of transforming the secular democratic Indian Republic into their version of a rabidly intolerant fascistic 'Hindu Rashtra'. These are being brushed aside by drawing parallels of ministers addressing industry associations. Unlike Prime Minister Narendra Modi's allegations of a 'remote control' directing the former UPA government, this BJP government is under the actual control of the RSS.

Recollect history. As India's first home minister, Sardar Patel, following the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi, banned the RSS. In a communiqué announcing this on February 4, 1948, Patel said: "The objectionable and harmful activities of the Sangh have, however, continued unabated and the cult of violence sponsored and inspired by the activities of the Sangh has claimed many victims. The latest and the most precious to fall was Gandhiji himself".

The RSS pleaded for talks with the government for withdrawing the ban. On November 14, 1948, Patel's home ministry issued a press note on the talks that were held with then RSS chief MS Golwalkar, who made many deceitful compromises. Saying that the "professions of RSS leaders are, however, quite inconsistent with the practice of its followers", Patel refused to withdraw the ban. It was only on July 11, 1949 that the ban was withdrawn when the RSS buckled and accepted all the conditions set by the government including that it shall remain a 'cultural organisation' 'eschewing secrecy and abjuring violence'. All 'conditions' that it is brazenly violating today.

In an effort to bypass the prohibition on the RSS in the political arena, it was then searching for a political arm. In 1951, it sent cadres to help Syama Prasad Mookerjee, who resigned from the Nehru Cabinet, to start the Bharatiya Jan Sangh. Among those who were sent were Deen Dayal Upadhyaya, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, LK Advani and SS Bhandari (Basu, Datta, Sarkar, Sarkar and Sen, Khaki Shots: Saffron Flags, 1993, p. 48).
:
In 1977, the Jan Sangh merged with the Janata Party and its leaders joined the central government as ministers following the defeat of Indira Gandhi's Emergency. That government fell on the 'dual membership' issue with these ministers and MPs refusing to quit the RSS. The former Jan Sangh component of the Janata Party thus separated forming the BJP. The BJP has scrupulously functioned as the RSS' political arm since then.

The import of this is clear now. Instead of implementing the many promises they made to the people procuring their mandate in the 2014 elections, the singular agenda that this Modi government is vigorously pursuing is to advance the RSS agenda. It does not have the people's mandate to do this. Instead of naming a new road or renaming other central avenues not named after any historical personality in New Delhi, like Shanti Path, Satya Marg and Niti Marg, they have chosen to rename Aurangzeb Road to perpetuate the memory of President APJ Abdul Kalam. The communal motivation is obvious. Those advocating the abolition of the death penalty in India, in consonance with the majority of world's countries, are branded as Pakistani agents in the wake of Yakub Memon's execution. Those demanding equality in the delivery of justice by demanding prosecution of the perpetrators of the Bombay communal riots following the Babri masjid demolition as identified by the Srikrishna Commission (which also confirmed that the 'causative factor' for the Bombay blasts were the communal riots) are condemned as 'anti-national'. Our vice-president is being targeted for having delivered an enlightened speech reminding India that a Muslim problem is an Indian problem. Muslims are 14% of our population, or 180 million, making them the second largest in the world, living as a minority in our country. A majority of Muslims were an integral part of our freedom movement and now in the modern Indian story. This speech has begun a churning process that impels all of us to introspect and act.

By castigating the vice-president for this, the RSS is, once again, puncturing the potential of India to rise to higher levels of syncretic civilisational advance. If there is any lasting impact on the advance of human civilisation by India, it is such syncretic evolution for centuries. Modern India has been the land where exciting intellectual and civilisational confluences took place. Prince Dara Shikoh, the legitimate inheritor of the Mughal throne after Shahjahan, murdered along with other brothers to allow Aurangzeb's accession, had authored in 1654-55 a short treatise in Persian titled Majma-ul-Bahrain (the mingling of two oceans). The prince learnt Sanskrit and meticulously translated the Upanishads into Persian. The West became familiar with these Sanskrit Upanishad texts through these translations which travelled through Arab lands. The prince translated "in order to discover Wahad Al Wujud (Singularity of the Creator) hidden in them". According to the prince, Islamic Sufism and Hindu mysticism converged on this concern though the forms of worship are vastly different.

Such religious and theological confluences elevating India's civilisational evolution were unfortunately aborted by the course of history. These threads of syncretic evolution that further enrich our civilisational content need to be picked up. Instead, all such efforts are being thwarted today. Aurangzeb ascended the throne as 'Badshah', admirably aided by religious zealots then. Communalism today prevents India from reaching greater heights of civilisational advances.

This is the biggest disservice being perpetrated by this BJP government. This comes over and above the betrayal of all promises it made to the people to capture their mandate.

(Sitaram Yechury is general secretary of the CPI(M) and a Rajya Sabha MP. The views expressed are personal.)