|
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts

May 24, 2024

In Madrid, a Vox party rally brought together Holocaust deniers, Israeli officials and right-wing leaders from around the world

 

The Reactionary International

This week in Madrid, a Vox party rally brought together Holocaust deniers, Israeli officials and right-wing leaders from around the world — putting Spain at the centre of a new far-right international movement.

 

https://www.tribunemag.co.uk/2024/05/the-reactionary-international

December 09, 2023

Zonism and Hindutva | Christophe Jaffrelot, Kalrav Joshi

From Savarkar to Golwalkar, why Hindutva admires Zionism The foundation of this emerging alliance rests on hostility to Islam, but there are other affinities between Zionism and Hindutva. Both are characterised by ethno-nationalist ideologies that prioritise factors like race, territory and nativism Written by Christophe Jaffrelot, Kalrav Joshi Updated: December 7, 2023 12:00 IST https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/from-savarkar-to-golwankar-why-hindutva-admires-zionism-9057486/

May 15, 2021

Video: How Israel Helped Create Hamas | The Intercept

 


January 20, 2018

India's 'Internet Hindus' Are in Love With Israel | Saudamini Jain

HAARETZ, January 20, 2018

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/india-s-internet-hindus-are-in-love-with-israel-1.5730730




Anshul Saxena, center, at an event he organized on a south Delhi street corner celebrating Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to India, January 2018.
Anshul Saxena, center, at an event he organized on a south Delhi street corner celebrating Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to India, January 2018.Manu Misra
In New Delhi, Anshul Saxena spends three to four hours a day on Israel.
The 26-year-old gathers information from right-wing websites, blogs, Wikipedia, the American Jewish Committee website and India-Israel friendship forums. He has set up alerts to be notified of any India-Israel news, and tries to tweet about Israel every day.
Back in November, he announced a celebration party when he first heard that Netanyahu would be visiting. Sometimes, the tweets are about Israel in general and the lessons India can learn from it.
A few months earlier, in July, he wrote: "Israel revived its Hebrew, whose fate was similar to Sanskrit about 7 decades ago. India should learn from Israel, We can revive Sanskrit."
Other times, he's inspired by the news. Last month, he wrote, comparing Jerusalem to the northern Indian city where a 16th-century mosque was demolished by right-wing Hindu mobs 25 years ago: "India should shift embassy from Tel Aviv to #Jerusalem. And also recognize that Temple Mount belongs to the only Jewish people. What Ayodhya Ram Mandir to Hindus, same Temple Mount to Jews."
The goal is to convince Indians that Israel is their country's best friend. Saxena has nearly 70,000 followers (and won about 5,000 new followers within six hours of Netanyahus arrival on Sunday.) He is one of the 1,861 accounts followed by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
His tweet about Hebrew inspiring a revival of Sanskrit has been retweeted 1,275 times and liked 1,982 times. The ones about Netanyahu have been retweeted a few hundred times.
Saxena drafts his tweets on a Word document – sometimes hundreds on a given theme. "The first thing I try is to make them informative and not controversial or humorous," he says. Then he forwards them to his friends – his core team of 50 people. On a group chat, they write their views and choose hashtags.

Anshul Saxena at a pro-Israel event he organized on a south Delhi street corner, where he handed out local dishes to passersby, January 2018.
Anshul Saxena at a pro-Israel event he organized on a south Delhi street corner, where he handed out local dishes to passersby, January 2018.Manu Misra

"There are groups on Twitter, WhatsApp, social media .... Each person has 500 to 1,000 people, some are in 100 to 200 groups," he says. "Theyre all pro-Israeli as well. So ... it keeps getting forwarded and circulated on social media."
In the summer of 2015, when Modi announced plans to visit Israel, tens of thousands of people (both Israelis and Indians – largely Hindus – in India and the diaspora) celebrated India-Israel brotherhood, and condemned the Palestinians, Pakistanis and Muslims in general. There were flags, quotes and memes. #IndiaWithIsrael trended a second time within a few days when India abstained from a July vote against Israel at the UN refugee agency, the UNHCR.
Over the next two years, Saxena campaigned for #WorstIranDeal (Iran Nuclear Deal is not only Threat to our friend @Israel but for the whole World, he tweeted), and #IndiaAgainstPalestinianTerror (I started it in the evening, but it failed, so I started again the next day, only then did it become successful).
Looking beyond Pakistan
In 2016, when Reuven Rivlin visited India, Saxena introduced #IndiaWelcomeIsraelPres. Last month, when the Palestinian ambassador to Pakistan was seen in a photo at a public event with Hafiz Saeed, considered the mastermind of the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, Saxena pushed #ShameOnPalestine. All of these hashtags trended in India.
On India's social media if you're trending Israel, then it's a very big deal, Saxena says. "People are not so aware of Israel, because here in India people dont think beyond Pakistan. When I get Israel trending, I know how much hard work it takes. A lot of people, we put in their minds that were pro-Israel, and you also become a part of this, you also understand it."
<a href="https://us-ads.openx.net/w/1.0/rc?cs=fiInstance_107459_0_7750479_iframe&cb=965fd0df2a&c.zoneid=fiInstance_107459_0_7750479&r0=https://cdn.firstimpression.io/delivery/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=38672__zoneid=107459__cb=965fd0df2a__oadest=" ><img src="https://us-ads.openx.net/w/1.0/ai?auid=539642966&cs=fiInstance_107459_0_7750479_iframe&cb=965fd0df2a" border="0" alt=""></a>
Saxena is what is called in India an internet Hindu: a vast and incalculable army of right-wing Hindu nationalists dominating the country's political discourse. Social media campaigns in India were credited with helping Modi and his Bhartiya Janta Party win the 2014 election in a landslide. These campaigns further encouraged nationalists on the Indian internet.
<a href="https://us-ads.openx.net/w/1.0/rc?cs=fiInstance_107460_0_7750479_iframe&cb=5e607f7efd&c.zoneid=fiInstance_107460_0_7750479&r0=https://cdn.firstimpression.io/delivery/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=38670__zoneid=107460__cb=5e607f7efd__oadest=" ><img src="https://us-ads.openx.net/w/1.0/ai?auid=539642964&cs=fiInstance_107460_0_7750479_iframe&cb=5e607f7efd" border="0" alt=""></a>
Saxena denies being part of the BJP's social media efforts, or being paid for his online campaigns – which he coordinates with BJP workers. I have an attachment to Israel, and that's why I do this. I dont get anything, he says.
In the days leading up to Netanyahu's visit, he tried to find an app that could add a filter of the Indian and Israeli flags to Twitter profile photos. There wasnt enough time to merge the two, so he settled for the Israeli blue and white.
In 2014, a few months after Modi became prime minister, #IndiaWithIsrael trended on Twitter for the first time – during that years Gaza war. Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga, now a BJP spokesman in Delhi, was then a famously aggressive internet Hindu. He worked on that campaign, and held a solidarity protest for Israel. Only 200 people showed up, but they made a human chain and carried banners saying India and Israel were united against terrorism.
"We thought we should give a message that Indians are in support of Israel, whatever is going on .... Whenever it comes to Kashmir, Palestine has never stood with us," Bagga says.
"If you want our support, then you should also give support in the same way. But who stands with us on the international platform? Israel. Whenever we have to fight, whenever we have a need, who gives us weapons? Israel. Who gives us technology? Israel. So as a good friend, when it stands with us, and we feel that these issues come to us in Kashmir through Pakistan, similarly Israel is also daily suffering."
Social media is occupied by Hindutva's people, adds former journalist Manoj Joshi, referring to the main form of Hindu nationalism in India. "So its very difficult to kind of make any judgment from that because they are there in great strength and they put forward their view," says Joshi, now a distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation.
He says it's very hard to ascertain how widespread these ideas are beyond Hindu nationalists. But the similarity between Israel and India, Joshi says, is a kind of imagined similarity.
Mainstream Indians are also very affected by these majoritarian kind of ideas, he says. All they see is that Israel has fought so well, Israel has dealt with its Muslims so well, not realizing that the reality is something else. Meaning Israel is a garrison state constantly under pressure, constantly living with insecurity.
Few reporters on the ground
This preoccupation with Israel, though, is largely invisible in the world outside social media. The Indian media is notoriously insular. The only Indian correspondent in Israel is a reporter for the news agency Press Trust of India, and prominent newspapers rely on Western news agencies.
And although he thinks that there is tremendous interest in Israel among many Indians, our understanding of Israel is very limited. Even among informed people, says P.R. Kumaraswamy, a professor of Middle Eastern studies specializing in Israel at New Delhis Jawaharlal Nehru University.
But because Hindutva is dominant today, the discourse is as well – and thus limited in its understanding of Israel. "They think if the Jews can revive Hebrew, we can also revive Sanskrit," Kumaraswamy says. "Jews also have the kibbutz, but are you ready to do a kibbutz?"
Hindu nationalists have vehemently admired and supported Israel since the 1940s. But Hindutva was a very small force in the 40s, and therefore a very small number of people were arguing on those lines, he says. But today it is seen as a large discourse, so the admiration is proportionately increased.
Last month, Abhijit Iyer-Mitra, a senior fellow at the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies in New Delhi, wrote a piece criticizing India's vote in the UN General Assembly. He rejected India's vote that condemned Washington's recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. 
When I wrote that piece I was expecting to get abused as usual when I criticize this government, he says. But instead, among Hindu nationalists, Indias vote was seen as a betrayal by the government.
Nationalists tweeted to External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj expressing their disappointment. And they also tweeted something to Netanyahu: apologies.
In recent days, the apologies have been replaced by excitement over Netanyahu's visit. Saxena has asked members of his group to change their display pictures to add #IndiaWithIsrael. Hes also putting together a video on why Israel is our best friend and why India runs away from Israel when that country is doing so much for us.
In 2009, Israel's Foreign Ministry had commissioned a survey that found that 58 percent of Indians have sympathy for Israel. The greatest level of sympathy for Israel was found in India, he says, referring to a survey of people in 13 countries including the United States, Britain, Canada, France, China and Russia. I want that in future surveys, this 58 percent turns into 90 percent.
The official hashtag for Netanyahus visit is #ShalomNamaste, combining the traditional greetings of both Hebrew and Hindi. But also trending is Saxenas #WelcomeNetanyahu, and he has also asked his followers to use #NetanyahuInIndia in tweets.
He asked his friends – those with verified accounts – to add the Israeli flag filter to their photos. Last time he checked with the filter creators, 1,030 people had added the filter (though he doesnt know how many of them are in India).
And as he promised, Saxena hosted an Israeli party on the streets in south Delhi. He handed out tea and samosas to everyone in the street, from rickshaw drivers to children. When the samosas ran out, he replaced them with khichri, a dish of rice and lentils. "The event went on for six hours," he says.


July 10, 2017

Hindutva for Zionism - Narendra Modi's visit to Israel (Manini Chatterjee)

The Telegraph - 10 July 2017

Hindutva for Zionism - Narendra Modi's visit to Israel was historic in every sense

Worm's Eye View
Manini Chatterjee

The penchant of the prime minister, Narendra Modi, for turning every meeting with a world leader into an over-the-top bromance is by now well known. So is his ability to blur the lines between friendly and over familiar.

We have seen him swaying on a traditional Gujarati swing with Xi Jinping; taking Malcolm Turnbull for a metro ride in Delhi; steering the French president, Emmanuel Macron, through the gardens of the Elysee Palace as though he were the host and Macron his acolyte; and famously referring to the former American president, Obama, by his first name, Barack, not once or twice but 22 times in course of a single radio broadcast.

Since many countries covet India's expanding markets and eagerly eye big ticket defence deals that New Delhi dangles before them, world leaders too have reciprocated Modi's hyper-friendly gestures, albeit a little gingerly. And every time Modi goes on a foreign trip, there is no end to gushing media coverage describing his sojourn as "historic" - even when it is, more often than not, just a continuation of India's engagement with the world that has steadily expanded over several decades past.

Yet, even his critics will concede that Modi's visit to Israel last week and his excessive camaraderie with Benjamin Netanyahu were on a different plane altogether - and the trip was, in every sense of the term, historic.

The P.V. Narasimha Rao government may have established full diplomatic ties with Israel back in 1992 and cooperation between India and Israel in many fields may have grown over the last 25 years.

But Modi was absolutely right in describing his July 4-6 visit to Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, the first ever by an Indian prime minister, as "path breaking"; just as Netanyahu was spot on when he referred to 2014 as the turning point when "we had decided to tear down the final walls dividing our countries".

That Modi and Netanyahu enjoyed a great chemistry was there for all to see - the frequent embraces; Modi's calling the Israeli prime minister by his pet name, "Bibi", and being referred to as mere dost in return; the private dinners; the schmaltzy meeting of the two with 26/11 survivor, Moshe Holtzberg; the walks on the beach.

But it was not this personal chemistry or the decision of the two countries to elevate their relationship to "a strategic partnership" that made Modi's trip path breaking. What made it so lies in two profound decisions - a refusal and an acceptance - taken by Modi. His refusal to visit Palestinian territories such as Ramallah which all visiting Indian and world leaders make a point to do, and his acceptance of Netanyahu's "impromptu" proposal to visit the tomb of Theodor Herzl, the founding father of Zionism, together underscore why exactly Modi's visit was so significant.

The two decisions not just broke with India's long tradition of supporting the Palestinian people who were forced out of their homeland in 1948 and continue to be homeless or occupied, but they also reflect a much greater bond rooted in a common sense of history and ideology between the right wing leaderships currently ruling both India and Israel. Modi and Netanyahu were well aware of this historic shift.

Within minutes of Modi landing in Israel, Netanyahu declared: "We love India. We view you as kindred spirits in our journey." A day later, Modi told the Israeli president, "I for I, when I say it, doesn't mean an eye for an eye. It means India for Israel."

That was a deliberate rhetorical flourish to gloss over the fact that not all of India supports Israel unconditionally and from the time of Indian Independence in 1947 and the formation of Israel less than a year later in May 1948, India had been a resolute defender of the Palestinian people and a steadfast critic of Israeli aggression.

Instead of "I for I", the more accurate description of what took place in Jerusalem would be "H for Z" - or Hindutva for Zionism. For the truth is that Hindu nationalism championed by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and the Hindu Mahasabha has always been supportive of Zionism and Israel for reasons both political and ideological.

One key reason is that the RSS greatly admires Israel's success in fighting the Muslim countries that surround it. For RSS followers, a "Hindu" India and a "Jewish" Israel have long been regarded as natural allies in the fight against Islam - with occasionally a "Christian" America thrown in to make a more formidable troika.

But the bonds between Zionism and Hindutva go much deeper. Zionism, founded by Theodor Herzl in 1897, was a political movement dedicated to the creation of a Jewish state and nation. The fusion of religious and cultural identity with a "holy" geographical entity is common to both Hindutva and Zionism. The Zionist idea, encapsulated in the Israeli declaration of Independence, states: "The Land of Israel was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped... After being forcibly exiled from their land, the people kept faith with it throughout their Dispersion... Impelled by this historic and traditional attachment, Jews strove in every successive generation to re-establish themselves in their ancient homeland..."

In light of Europe's long history of anti-Semitism that culminated in Hitler's horrific Final Solution in the last century, the desire of the Jewish people to have a safe homeland gained much sympathy after the Second World War - not least from the guilt-ridden Western world that had failed to prevent the Holocaust.

But much before Hitler came on the scene, V.D. Savarkar - in an echo of the Zionist creed - declared that Hindus alone were the legitimate people of India because their pitrabhoomi (fatherland) was the same as their punyabhoomi (holy land). In his book Hindutva, first published in 1923, Savarkar wrote: "... no people in the world can more justly claim to get recognized as a racial unit than the Hindus and perhaps the Jews."

Elsewhere, in the same book, he wrote: "Look at the Jews; neither centuries of prosperity nor sense of gratitude for the shelter they found, can make them more attached or even equally attached to the several countries they inhabit. Their love is, and must necessarily be divided between the land of their birth and the land of their Prophets. If the Zionists' dreams are ever realized - if Palestine becomes a Jewish State and it will gladden us almost as much as our Jewish friends - they, like the Mohammedans, would naturally set the interests of their Holy land above those of their Motherland in America and Europe..."

The RSS ideologue, M.S. Golwalkar, may have been less explicit in his admiration for Zionism and he even extolled Germany for showing "how well nigh impossible it is for Races and Cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one unified whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to learn and profit by."

But Golwalkar's appreciation for the "race spirit" of the German people was in keeping with his belief that the bedrock of nationhood is religion, language, race and culture; not a shared citizenship based on universal values. In fact, Golwalkar's writings, too, borrow heavily from Zionist and Judaic exhortations. If orthodox Jews believe they are god's "Chosen People", Golwalkar has described India as the land of the Hindus or "The Chosen Land".

He has written, for instance, "Our forefathers were of the conviction that throughout the world this is the holiest of the lands where the least merit will bear fruit a hundred or thousand-fold... It was given to the great sons of this soil to see and realize God in His full effulgence."

Imbued with great pride in their ancient roots and their holy lands, and fed by centuries of real and perceived persecution, both Hindutva and strong strands within Zionism today seek to champion a muscular militarized nationalism that is exclusionary to the core and has no place for the un-chosen Other.

No wonder Netanyahu and Modi bonded so well together. It was a meeting of hearts and minds, certainly - between a Hindutva hardliner and a zealous Zionist.

manini.chatterjee@abp.in

July 05, 2017

Modi's visit to Israel: I am aghast as an Indian, ashamed as a secular Jew (Kamal Chenoy)

Daily O

Modi in Israel: I am aghast as an Indian, ashamed as a secular Jew
This is not foreign policy, but a continuation of the communal marginalisation of minorities.

04-07-2017

Kamal Mitra Chenoy

@KamaIChenoy


There has been a long-standing demand among Zionists, Jews dedicated to a homeland for the Jews scattered throughout the world. After World War I, the British government sent Lord Balfour in 1917 to grant the Zionists a part of Palestine as the holy land of the Jews.

Lord Balfour gave the Balfour declaration to the Jewish banker Lord Rothschild to pass it on to the Zionist leadership. However, this action had no ratification from the League of Nations.

Britain had no right to give the land to the Zionists who themselves had no right to it. Interestingly, the Balfour declaration stated that there should be no violation of the religious or civil rights of the non-Jewish peoples. The Zionists violated that condition, as they violated virtually all agreements they were party to.

In 1947, there was the UN Partition Plan dividing Palestine between Israel and Palestine. There were few decolonised countries who were members of the UN. India opposed the UN Partition Plan and did not accept the creation of Israel.

This was followed by the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948, where the “Nakba” or terrible disaster led to the expulsion of over 7,00,000 Palestinians from Palestine. They and their ancestors were never allowed to return to their homeland.

Also in 1948, the Zionist gangs including the Irgun and Stern gangs attacked friendly Palestinian villages like Deir Yassin in which hundreds were killed. The Zionist gangs and their underground army, Haganah, bombed the King David Hotel in Palestine, killing the UN envoy Count Bernadotte.

From 1948 to the attack on the Suez Canal in 1956, to the 1967 Palestine-Israel war, then the 1973 war, and finally the assault on Gaza by Israel some years ago, in which 2,200 Palestinians were killed including 550 children, the imperial wars have continued. More than $1 billion of damages including the destruction of Gaza resulted.

These wars are punctuated by a serious of assaults on Palestinian civilians as the Zionist machine occupies more and more Palestinian land.

Lately, an extreme right-wing Zionist Knesset (Parliament) member Yehuda Glick has warned the Palestinians that their actions could lead to the destruction of the holy Al-Aqsa mosque. This has led to a series of knife attacks by Palestinians incensed by the threat to the holy shrine. Many of the Palestinian revolting have been shot dead.

flag-embed_070417080431.jpgIndia opposed the UN Partition Plan and did not accept the creation of Israel. Photo: Reuters

The world has not stood still. As many as 78 resolutions have been passed by the UN on the Palestine-Israel question. They have been vetoed by the US and its allies. There are many more Jews in the US than in Israel. The occupation of Jerusalem continues. Palestinian civilians continue to die. There are few secrets the world over about this occupied land.

So why is Prime Minister Narendra Modi going to this brutal and criminal country? Why is he becoming the first Indian PM to visit this racist and imperial country?

There are many Jews like the linguist and scholar Noam Chomsky, the famous international jurist Richard Falk, and Israeli historian Ilan Pappe (who had to leave Israel in 2008 and is teaching in the US) - all of them reject the Zionist and racist creation of Israel.

Therefore, why is our Prime Minister so keen to go to Israel? In the last important Israeli visit to India by former president and veteran leader Shimon Peres, senior BJP leader LK Advani reportedly asked Peres for suggestions on how to deal with Kashmir. Peres, a very wily leader, suggested that India should populate the Kashmir valley with non-Kashmiris.

The increasing tempo of attacks and lynchings shows the Prime Minister’s inadequate response to rising communalism. What better exposure than Israel for the BJP to show the way to suppress minorities and all those who do not accept the diktats of the NDA?

This is not foreign policy, but a continuation of the communal marginalisation of minorities. As an Indian citizen I am aghast. As a secular Jew, I am deeply ashamed.

August 21, 2014

Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena etc were to Hold Rally to Support Israel on July 21, 2014 in Mumbai - says announcement



[Namo Tea Party and Indo-Israel Friendship Association and others were to be at at this event]
See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/07/rally-support-israel-hamas-july-21-2014-mumbai.html

India: 20000 March in Calcutta in Solidarty with Israel - August 16 event organized by a political outfit known as Hindu Samhati



20,000 march in Kolkata in show of support for Israel | The Times of Israel

Protest organizer says India and Israel, ‘surrounded by very tough neighbors,’ are united in peace
By Amanda Borschel-Dan August 17, 2014

Read more:
http://www.timesofisrael.com/20000-march-in-kolkata-in-show-of-support-for-israel/

August 08, 2014

Reena Pushkarna of Overseas BJP Israel Chapter Serves Biryani to Israeli troops

Reena Pushkarna, who runs a chain of tandoori restaurants in Israel, set up a make-shift kitchen and rustled up 400 kg of biryani near the Gaza border where Israel and Hamas have been fighting for almost a month.

Pushkarna, who made Tel Aviv her home 30 years ago, and her crew of four chefs served the biryani to more than 2,000 Israeli soldiers

She is the convener of the Israel chapter of the Overseas Friends of BJP and flew down for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s swearing-in ceremony in May.

readmore at: http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/in-the-shadow-of-war-indian-offers-biryani-comfort-to-israeli-troops/article1-1248694.aspx

October 31, 2012

India: Billboard of “Hitler” men’s wear store in Ahmedabad taken down [possibly because Modi wants appear sensitive to international image]

From: Indian Express

AMC team brings down HITLER in a surprise raid

Express news service : Ahmedabad, Wed Oct 31 2012, 04:20 hrs
Ahmedabad



In an unusual move, the municipal staff on Tuesday suddenly turned up at the “Hitler” men’s wear store in the city’s Vastrapur area and tore down fonts from its billboard even as onlookers watched on.

Municipal Commissioner Guruprasad Mohapatra admitted he had ordered his staff to remove the name which was in “extremely bad taste”. “We have no legal basis for today’s action, but the store’s name was in extremely bad taste. The Israeli Consul-General wrote me a letter complaining about it. I also received hundreds of emails from different people.”

Taken aback since they had not received any notice, the store’s owners along with their lawyer rushed to lodge an FIR with the local police station. When that was disallowed, they submitted a complaint against “unidentified persons of AMC” at the Police Commissioner’s office for destruction of property and forcibly changing their store’s name.

On Tuesday noon, a team of municipal staff arrived at the Advait shopping complex, where the store is located, and ordered the board removed.

“It happened so fast that we did not have time to register a complaint with the police,” said Rajesh Shah, one of the owners who was forced by the AMC staff to climb up a ladder and pull down the white fonts from the black board.

Within half-an-hour, the white H-I-T-L-E-R letters had been yanked off, but the swastika that dotted the “i” and tiny, almost imperceptible cursive letters “I’m not”, stuck in front of the Nazi dictator’s surname after widespread protests last month, remained.

Soon afterward, civic officials left and Manish Chandani, also one of the owners, zoomed off on his motorcycle to lodge an FIR with the local police station.

“They should have sent us a legal notice. They cannot suddenly come and destroy private property like this. We have registered the trademark with the central government and the registration of the store’s name is pending with the civic authorities,” Shah said, adding that officials in the shops and establishment department of the AMC had asked him to rename the store.

Mohapatra, however, said: “I have no idea if they were asked to change the name at the time of applying for a licence. The sign board is removed and they will apply with a new name,” he said.

The civic chief added that authorities had earlier tried to dissuade them from using the name when they applied for the licence to use it.

Ever since it opened over two months ago, the store had received media attention both nationwide and internationally after a group of local Jews visited the store to ask the name be changed.

An official from the Chief Minister’s Office is even said to have accompanied civic officials to try and persuade Shah and Chandani to change the name on September 4.

Israeli Consul-General Orna Sagiv, who was in Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad for a trade fair of Israeli technology, had even told journalists she highlighted the issue when she met CM Narendra Modi.

After the pressure mounted, the owners had relented and announced they would change the name. The New York Times even issued a call for suggestions for the store’s new name.

Shah and Chandani, however, backtracked later, saying those who wanted the name changed must pay for a new signboard and foot expenses for a new registration.

Stray protests continued. Shah said two local “Jewish” men came to the store a few weeks ago enquiring about the price of some t-shirts but eventually asking why the name was not changed as announced.

“I knew they were not really interested in those t-shirts,” said Shah.

October 26, 2011

India and Israel: a friendship deepened by prejudice

From The Guardian

An alliance against Islamic extremism must not become an excuse for far-right parties to fan anti-Muslim sentiment

[by] Kapil Komireddi

(guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 25 October 2011)


Babri mosque
Hindu extremists' struggle to seize the Babri mosque in northern India looks to Israel's appropriation of Palestinian land as a template. Photograph: Douglas E Curran/AFP/Getty Images

In 1974, the New York Times journalist Bernard Weinraub described India as "the loneliest post in the world" for Israeli diplomats. Having voted against the creation of Israel at the UN in 1947, India held back from establishing full diplomatic relations with Tel Aviv until 1992. For decades, Israel's presence in India was limited to an immigration office in Mumbai. In between, India voted with the majority to pass UN resolution 3379, condemning Zionism as a form of racism, became one of the first non-Arab states to recognise Palestine's declaration of independence in 1988, and was generally among the more vocal non-Arab voices against Israel.

Today, India is Israel's closest eastern ally and its largest arms market. Annual non-military bilateral trade alone exceeds $4.5bn. Since 2001, the diasporas of the two countries have emerged as energetic allies against a shared enemy: Islamic extremism. A survey by the Israeli foreign ministry in 2009 found India to be the most pro-Israel country in the world, well above the US. Once a bastion of pro-Palestinian sentiment, India recently appeared at the bottom in a worldwide poll of countries sympathetic to Palestinian statehood. Throw a stone in Panaji and it is likely to land on an Israeli backpacking through India after his post-mandatory service.

What precipitated this dramatic shift? Israel had all along been a quiet ally of New Delhi, volunteering clandestine support as India sought to repel attacks by China (in 1962) and Pakistan (in 1965). Israeli officials knew also that India, which had no history of anti-semitism, had arrived at its Israel policy through a combination of post-colonial hauteur, realpolitik – particularly its desire to placate Arab opinion in its contest against Islamic Pakistan – and an ethical commitment to the Palestinian cause. Partly for these reasons, India's anti-Israel actions rarely provoked any anxiety in Tel Aviv.

There are three principal reasons behind the shift in India's attitude. The first is the belated realisation that no amount of deference to Arab sentiment could alter Muslim opinion in the Middle East in India's favour: when it came to Kashmir, Shia and Sunni united in supporting Pakistan's position. The second owes itself to the collapse of the old world order: the death of the Soviet Union meant that India had to seek out new allies. The third factor that contributed to the deepening of Indo-Israeli ties is less well-known: the rise of Hindu nationalism in India.

To votaries of Hindu nationalism, Israel is something of a lodestar: a nation to be revered for its ability to defeat, and survive among, hostile Muslims. As the liberal Israeli newspaper Haaretz put it, "Relations between Israel and India tend to grow stronger when … India experiences a rightward shift in anti-Muslim public opinion or in leadership".

This explains why Hindu opinion is inflamed even by the most anodyne Indian expression of solidarity with Palestine. At the UN general assembly last month India's prime minister, Manmohan Singh, offered some somniferous words of support for Palestine's membership effort: "India is steadfast in its support for the Palestinian people's struggle for a sovereign, independent, viable and united state of Palestine with East Jerusalem as its capital, living within secure and recognisable borders side by side and at peace with Israel".

No one in Israel seemed to have noticed. None of the major newspapers editorialised it. There wasn't even a specific news item in the Israeli press singling out India. Trade did not suffer. The markets registered no shifts. But this did not deter some Indians from rising to take offence on Israel's behalf. To Sadanand Dhume, a US based commentator who published a hysterical philippic in the Wall Street Journal castigating India for not "throwing its weight behind Israel", Singh's speech was nothing short of a "foreign policy mishap". According to Dhume, who has since been ordained "the go-to guy for all matters India" by an excited colleague of his: "Both India and Israel represent ancient civilisations whose land carries a special spiritual significance for most of its people."

This desire to define citizenship and belonging in the procrustean terms of ancient culture over all other considerations is where Hindutva and Zionism converge. As Koenrad Elst, one of the most influential producers of pro-Hindutva pabulum, has said of the movement's founder, "Veer Savarkar was the Hindu counterpart of a Zionist: he defined the Hindus as a nation attached to a motherland, rather than as a religious community". "True, there is an obvious difference between the situation of the Jews, who had to migrate to their motherland … and the Hindus who merely had to remove the non-Hindu … regime from their territory." This prescription for ethnic cleansing came to life in 1992, when Hindu nationalists brought down the Babri mosque in the northern Indian city of Ayodhya. Their ongoing struggle to seize the Babri land, which belonged to Muslims for over five centuries, looks to Israel's appropriation of Palestinian territory as a useful template.

In 2009, Mumbai's anti-terror squad arrested, among others, an officer in the Indian army, Prasad Purohit, for masterminding a terrorist attack on Pakistani citizens and plotting to overthrow the secular Indian state. In his confession, Purohit admitted to making plans to approach Israel for help. It says something about the state of Israel when the most virulently anti-Muslim terrorists in India reflexively look to it as a potential source of support.

This is tragic – because, in the minds of the formidable men who willed them into existence, India and Israel were alike. Theodor Herzl's conception of Israel was remarkably similar to Mahatma Gandhi's idea of India. Both men refined their ideas gradually. In Der Judenstaat, Herzl presented Israel as a "rampart of Europe against Asia, an outpost of civilisation as opposed to barbarism". Several years later, he offered a more coherent version, a blueprint for a modern pluralistic state, operating under the aegis of Jews, but self-consciously inclusive: visionary Jews and welcoming Arabs people his extraordinary novel Altneuland, one of the founding texts of Zionism. Herzl resolved the conflicts of conscience by transmitting some of the most powerful arguments for Israel's establishment through an Arab character, Reshid Bey. "It was a great blessing," Reshid explains to a sceptical visitor. "Nothing could have been more wretched than an Arab village at the end of the 19th century … [The Arabs] are better off than at any time in the past." But Herzl was alert to the victim's capacity to victimise. In Dr Geyer, we are shown a chilling vision of majoritarian zealotry: a fanatical rabbi, he wants all Arabs expelled from the New Society. Redemption comes in the form of David Littwak, the son of a peasant who believes in a land for all, Arab and Jew, and whose opposition to and victory over Geyer is cast as the highest affirmation of Zionism. Unlike Herzl, Gandhi scorned modern technology for most of his life. In his early life, Gandhi's politics were conspicuously exclusionary. But the India he imagined even after alighting on his Satyagraha campaign relied on a network of Indian David Littwaks to survive. It was a dream that crashed during his own lifetime, with the partition of India.

Today, some of the most powerful politicians in Israel are those who violate Herzl's ideas. Avigdor Lieberman, a Russian immigrant foreign minister of Israel, has openly echoed Geyer's thoughts, calling for the expulsion of Israeli Arabs. In Gandhi's home state, Narendra Modi, a rabidly anti-Muslim politician implicated in the anti-Muslim pogrom of 2002, continues to secure handsome mandates from the largely Hindu electorate.

India's support for Palestine is one of the last remaining precepts from time of Pandit Nehru, India's first prime minister who is loathed by Hindu chauvinists for refusing to turn India into a "Hindu Pakistan". As per the Hindu nationalist narrative, the Congress party's support for Palestine – if such a thing actually exists in any meaningful sense – is a bribe to Indian Muslims. In reality, Indian Muslims have made noticeable efforts to build bridges with Israel. But if anyone can be accused of holding foreign policy hostage to religious bigotry, it is the Hindu nationalist BJP. During its disastrous term in power, from 1997 to 2004, ministers in the government dismissed pro-Palestinians as "more Palestinian than Palestinians themselves". Its foreign minister, Jaswant Singh, suggested that a common civilisational outlook bound India and Israel – implying that Indian Muslims who shared the faith of the Arab majority were somehow alien to India's "civilisation".

India and Israel have much to offer each other and Israel's security must figure as a non-negotiable precondition in New Delhi's support for Palestine. But Hindu nationalists are not concerned with the security of Israel: it is the abandonment of Palestinians they seek.

The seeds of Israel's redemption are embedded in Zionism, which is concerned with housing people, not displacing them. Israel must merely embrace it. It will still be a paternalistic form of "pluralism", but it will be inclusive. On the other hand, Hindutva's very purpose is the disenfranchisement and abolition of religious minorities. So Israelis must wonder what has become of them, their nation, that their most fervid admirers in the most pro-Israeli country in the world happen to be fascists. Until Israel and India undertake an honest reappraisal of their friendship, those who care about the ideas of Herzl and Gandhi must acknowledge this much: theirs is an alliance deepened by prejudice.

July 18, 2010

Hindutva terror’s deep roots exposed


Mail Today, 18 July 2010


Saffron Terror’s Hall of Shame


By Krishna Kumar

Why did the CBI sleep over vital leads provided by Hemant Karkare? These expose Hindutva terror’s deep roots

“What happened in Hyderabad’s [Mecca] Masjid and what is happening in other mosques hasn’t been done by the ISI. It was our people who were involved.”

TITLED Major Upadhaya. wma, this audio file in Malegaon blast suspect (and self-styled Shankaracharya) Dayanand Pande’s laptop shows why the CBI, which is patting itself on the back for cracking the Ajmer Sharif dargah and Mecca Masjid 2007 blasts, should have solved these cases last year. In the recording, Major Ramesh Upadhyaya (Retd.) is heard planning out the 2008 Malegaon blast that killed six and injured over 70. Other recordings recovered from Pande’s laptop reveal that the blast was just a small part of the terror outfit Abhinav Bharat’s diabolical gameplan. The radical organisation was even in talks with groups based in Nepal and Israel to achieve its stated goal of establishing a ‘pure’ Hindu Rashtra. This, as well as the other sinister designs of the Hindutva terror brigade, are stored in recordings on Pande’s laptop, which was recovered by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) led by Hemant Karkare in 2008. Another recording has Delhi Hindu Mahasabha chief Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi talking about his links with an anti-Islamic group based in the UK. “We are in regular touch with Stephen Gaus in England. He is a dreaded anti-communist and anti-Islamic.

His units are growing rapidly in France, Germany, England and America,” Tripathi is heard saying. In yet another recording, Malegaon blast ‘mastermind’ Lt Col Shrikant Prasad Purohit talks about contacting King Gyanendra of Nepal for the training and shelter of the Abhinav Bharat men. Then, Pande mentions using the services of a British woman who works as a secretary in the United Nations to get the ‘Hindu Government in exile’ registered in the UN. Purohit, a Military Intelligence man, is heard talking about starting a military school in every state, where recruits would be given rifle training during the summer. He tells an as- yet unidentified man that the school could be used to hide people in case of “any police action”. The colonel goes on to say that the Sangh’s name should not be linked in any way to the schools. “We have to assume such a name that is deceptive. We will work under the name ‘Bastion Guards.’

There is nothing related to the Sangh. The saffron flag is also not there,” he says on tape. In another conversation, Purohit admits that the blasts (Mecca Masjid and Ajmer Sharif) had been carried out by people he knew. The transcripts show not just how dangerous the men were but also why the investigations should have been taken over by central intelligence agencies immediately. “Listen to the tapes and you’ll understand why these men should be charged with sedition and waging war against the state,” said a former Maharashtra ATS officer involved in the investigations. The officer added that what the CBI is claiming as its findings had come to light during ATS investigations in 2008 itself. ATS chief Hemant Karkare, who was killed in the 26/11 attacks, was under tremendous pressure not to dig deep into the Malegaon case. “Both the opposition and some ministers in the state government were not happy with Karkare’s investigations.

A senior state cabinet minister in the Congress-NCP government known for his opposition to dance bars had blasted Karkare for the investigations just a week before his death,” said a source. The involvement of politicians and army officers in the Abhinav Bharat operations is perhaps why Karkare was pulled up. A witness in the Malegaon case said that a ‘Colonel Dhar’ (later identified as Lt Col Bappaditya Dhar) was present in an Abhinav Bharat meeting. Purohit had also named several officers. “There are many respected men who are not there today,” Purohit is learnt to have said, adding, “There is a Col Raikar, Col Shailesh Raikar, a Major Nitin Joshi, and a Col Hasmukh Patel.” The ATS is learnt to have interrogated Raikar and Dhar extensively but could not move against them as it did not have a watertight case. But it says that the Army should have stepped in and conducted an inquiry. The transcripts show how the ATS was hampered because of the large number of suspects spread across different states. As an ATS officer puts it, it would be a mistake to treat the Malegaon case as an aberration. The inter-linkages between the prime suspects in the terror attacks have shown that the ATS officer, indeed, is right.

Why then was the CBI sleeping over the information Karkare had recovered before attaining martyrdom on 26/11?

1. INDRESH KUMAR , RSS

LINKED TO THE BLASTS ACCUSED PROBED FOR: Close links with Sunil Joshi and Devender Gupta

RSS national executive member and close associate of Mohan Bhagwat, the sarsanghchalak, ‘ Indreshji’ is one of the Sangh Parivar’s main strategists. He is alleged to have been the major force behind communalising the Amarnath agitation in 2008 and also mobilising the Madhesis in Nepal against the Maoists. He launched the Muslim Ekta Manch to rally together ‘ nationalist’ Muslims.

Investigating agencies are examining his links with Devendra Gupta, key accused in the 2007 Ajmer Sharif bombing. Also being probed are his ties with Sunil Joshi, suspected to be the bomber behind the Mecca Masjid and Ajmer Sharif blasts.

2.SUNIL JOSHI , RSS

BLAST ACCUSED WHOSE MURDER IS A MYSTERY ACCUSED OF: Ajmer Sharif and Mecca Masjid bombings

The main suspect in the 2007 blasts, this RSS pracharak was a friend of Malegaon accused Pragya Thakur and also faced the charge of murdering a local Congress leader. He was close to Swami Aseemanand, who had warned him of the imminent threat to his life post the blasts. Joshi had said to his friends that his mentor was Indresh Kumar. Investigating agencies are probing Joshi’s hand in the Amritsar- Lahore Samjhauta Express blasts in February 2007.

3. DEVENDRA GUPTA , RSS

HIS MOBILE SIM ‘ TRIGGERED’ AJMER BLAST ACCUSED OF: Mecca Masjid and Ajmer Sharif dargah blasts

An RSS pracharak with Abhinav Bharat links, Gupta was arrested in Ajmer on April 28 on the charge of purchasing the SIM card that had triggered the Ajmer Sharif dargah bomb on October 11, 2007.

The SIM card had been purchased in Jharkhand, along with ten others.

Gupta is alleged to have been close to Sunil Joshi and Ramchandra Kalsangra, who had allegedly planted the bomb in Malegaon.

Gupta met Joshi in Mhow in 2006 and it was Kalsangra who introduced him to Pragya Thakur.

4.DAYANAND PANDE , RSS

SPIRITUAL GURU OF ABHINAV BHARAT AND PORN PURVEYOR ACCUSED OF: September 2008 Malegaon blast

Born Sudhakar Udaybhan Dwivedi, he has taken on many names. He started life as Swami Amrutnand Devtirth and then took on the more pious- sounding title of Shankaracharya and settled in Kashmir.

All the terror meetings were held in his presence and all the accused addressed him as ‘ swamiji’. His habit of recording all meetings and saving them on his laptop proved to be his undoing. The recordings are being used as evidence against him and his cohorts. Apart from these audio and video clips, cops have also found a cache of obscene pictures and clips that he had downloaded from the Net.

5. MAJ. RAMESH UPADHYAYA (RETIRED)

ABHINAV BHARAT, STALKER WHO TALKED OF ‘PURE’ HINDU RASHTRA ACCUSED OF: September 2008 Malegaon blast

Upadhyaya retired from the Army in 1988 and was the chief of the BJP’s ex-servicemen’s cell in Mumbai. The Maharashtra ATS claims he was a mere ‘member’ of the organisation, but from the tapes recovered from Pande it seems he was present in all meetings where the Malegaon bombing was planned. He used to interact at length with both Purohit and Pande. For all his talk of a ‘pure’ Hindu Rashtra, Upadhyaya had been arrested twice for stalking, threatening and posting indecent remarks about a woman whom he wanted to marry.

6.PRAGYA THAKUR

SANNYASIN WITH AN UNHOLY OBSESSION WITH BLOODSHED ACCUSED OF: September 2008 Malegaon blast

L.K. Advani might have defended her by claiming that she was a sadhvi but there was nothing holy about Pragya’s thoughts and actions. Advani’s claim was torn to shreds by the ATS, whose recorded telephone intercepts reveal how Pragya was disappointed when she heard that “just three people” had been killed in the Malegaon. Her involvement in Abhinav Bharat’s activities may not have been much, but she is suspected to have procured the explosives for the Malegaon blast. She didn’t get along with Purohit as both claimed to be leaders of the ‘Hindu Rashtra’ movement.

7.SHRIKANT P PUROHIT,

LT COL, MILITARY INTELLIGENCE ARMS PROCURER; GUN-RUNNER ON THE SIDE ACCUSED OF: September 2008 Malegaon blast

A fitness fanatic who knows four languages, the former Military Intelligence officer is said to be the brain behind the operation. The ATS believes Purohit had procured weapons and even RDX from an Army depot. Ironically, the man who wore Army colours is heard declaring in the Pande tapes that he doesn’t believe in the Constitution. The ATS says he knows about the other blasts and the people who carried them out, but he refuses to talk. Purohit was not averse to making money on the side. He was into gun-running as well.

8.SWAMI ASEEMANAND

MASTERMIND & GOOD FRIEND OF GUJARAT CHIEF MINISTER NARENDRA MODI

The ATS does not list him as an accused, but he’s very much under the scanner. The Kolkata native, known as Jatin Chatterjee before he donned his ochre robes, came to the Dangs district of Gujarat for a campaign to bring Christian converts back into the Hindu fold. A respected leader of the RSS, Aseemanand is said to be very close to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi, which may be why the ATS has not been able to catch up with him. His interrogation will provide the ATS clues to piece together the Hindutva terror jigsaw.

9. RAMACHANDRA KALSANGRA & SANDEEP DANGE

SUSPECTED BOMBERS ACCUSED OF: Malegaon, Mecca Masjid and Ajmer Sharif blasts

Very little is known about these shadowy characters except that they’re both from Indore and are suspected to be the bombers in the Malegaon, Mecca Masjid and Ajmer Sharif blasts. They’ve eluded the CBI, which has declared a reward of Rs 10 lakh on each of them. Dange is also known as Parmanand; Kalsangra’s aliases are Ramji or Vishnu Patel. Both are around 35 years old and suspected to be major players in the Hindutva terror network.

10.ASHOK VARSHNEY & ASHOK BERRY, RSS

LINKED TO BLASTS ACCUSED OF: Providing assistance to Devendra Gupta

The two are being investigated by CBI for their alleged role in the Ajmer Sharif and Mecca Masjid blasts. Varshney, a former RSS prant pracharak in Jharkhand, had allegedly sourced and handed over two SIM cards to Devendra Gupta, a key accused in the Ajmer Sharif bombing. These cards were allegedly used to stage the May 18, 2007, Mecca Masjid blast. The ATS’s of Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh and the CBI have grilled both Varshney and Berry, an RSS central committee member, many times since June 21 both in Lucknow and Delhi. Both Varshney and Berry had acknowledged their association with Gupta. Before his arrest on April 30, Gupta had stayed at Varshney’s Kanpur home.

11. B.L. SHARMA ‘PREM’, BJP

PLANNING BIG ON THE MASS CONVERSIONS OF MUSLIMS ACCUSED OF: One of Abhinav Bharat’s founders. Close to Pandey and Purohit

Also known as Prem Singh Sher after he embraced the Khalsa Panth in 1999, Sharma is a two-time BJP Member of the Lok Sabha. He was first elected from East Delhi in 1991 and then in 1996. He fought the last parliamentary elections in 2009 from Delhi North East, but lost to Jai Prakash Aggarwal. In a video recording accessed by Headlines Today, he is seen in discussions with Pandey and Purohit on starting a terror movement against Muslims. The meeting is believed to have taken place at a Nashik temple in 2007.

12.RAKESH DHAWADE & SHARAD KUNTE

LINKED WITH BOMB MAKING ACCUSED OF: Dhawade, of imparting bomb training. He accuses Kunte of being engaged in the same task

A research fellow at the Institute of Research and Development in Oriental Studies (IRDOS), Pune, Dhawade has been charged by the Maharashtra ATS with “imparting training and exploding a bomb in Parbhani and Jalna”. Dhawade is said to be a ‘weapons collector’ because of his vast collection of antique arms. In a statement recorded before a magistrate, Dhawade has named Sharad Kunte, a Pune professor who teaches at the Narsooji Wadia College, as the man who taught students to make bombs. Kunte was the VHP’s Pune unit president for many years. He has been questioned by the ATS, but not booked.

13.LOKESH SHARMA

Abhinav Bharat MURDER ACCUSED & BLAST SUSPECT ACCUSED OF Involvement in the Ajmer Sharif bombing

The Indore resident, who is among the 14 who have been charged with the murder of a local Congress leader in August 2003, was picked up by the Rajasthan ATS from the Chhindwara district of Madhya Pradesh on May 14. The ATS got wind of him after it had questioned the Ajmer blast accused, Devendra Gupta and Chandrashekhar Borad, who had been arrested on April 29. Sunil Joshi, deceased suspected bomber, was also one of the accused in the Congress leader’s murder. Sharma is out on bail in the case. The common link that binds all of them is their loyalty to the fiery sadhvi, Pragya Thakur.

UNITED TO DIVIDE BHARAT

The key people who were prepared to go to any length to wreck India for their dream to establish a Hindu Rashtra

January 31, 2009

Purohit planned Israel-based Hindu govt-in-exile, support from Thai contacts

(Indian Express, Jan 20, 2009
http://www.indianexpress.com/story_print.php?storyid=412947 )

The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad chargesheet in the Malegaon blast case claims that as per statements from the accused the town was singled out for the blast as "it was the ideal place where the Muslim community crowd was the maximum" and that prime accused Lt Col Prasad Purohit had told fellow conspirators it was time to set up a parallel, Hindu government-in-exile which could operate out of Israel and ensure a completely sashastra (armed) India. Purohit, according to the chargesheet, promised "all logistic help" with finances from several quarters and support from some of his contacts in Thailand. The ATS chargesheet, which includes two important confession statements, statements of witnesses under Section 164, laptop records, telephonic records, detailed SMSes and financial transactions across states, will be filed tomorrow in the designated MCOCA court chaired by sessions judge Y D Shinde.

The ATS will tell the court how a group called Abhinav Bharat became a "front organisation" for a conspiracy which led to an explosion at 9.26 pm on September 29, 2008 at Bhikku Chowk, Malegaon. While all eleven accused have been charged with conspiracy, logistics and execution of the blast, the key roles, according to the ATS, were those of Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Sudhakar Dardwivedi alias Dayanand Pandey. This will be the first case where a probe has been able to reach the conspirators - unlike other cases where only those who planted bombs have been arrested. In this case, the alleged bomb planters - Sameer Dange, Ramji Kalsangra - and Pravin Patil, another on the wanted list, remain at large. Patil also used the cover name of Mutalik and is a close aide of Purohit.

While the forensic finding of the chassis and engine number of the motorcycle used in the blast - it was a Gujarat registration number GJ-05-1920, owned by Pragya Singh Thakur - led the ATS to Gujarat, it was the statements of witnesses and the forensic report that helped the ATS build a strong case. The ATS chargesheet has relied heavily on the statement of Sudhakar Chaturvedi (37), the last to be arrested, who said Purohit had called him on September 17, asking him to give the keys of his house in Deolali to a person named Pawar. According to the ATS, Pawar handed the keys to Ramji Kalsangra who along with some others used the house to assemble the bomb that was eventually used in Malegaon. The ATS team took a picture of Ramji to the locality where Chaturvedi stayed. Two witnesses identified him and confirmed that Ramji did come to the house. A search of the house revealed remains of items used in making the bomb - this was verified by a forensic team. Evidences include recordings from the laptop of Sudhakar Dardwivedi which also has footage of various meetings.

Of the arrested, it is Rakesh Dataram Dhavde's involvement in the conspiracy that led the ATS to slap MCOCA charges against all ten accused. Pragya Singh's telephonic conversations recorded with accused Shyam Sahu immediately after the blasts will be included in the chargesheet. According to the ATS, the Abhinav Bharat, a group founded on June 12, 2006 in Raigad where Shivaji was coronated, initially had retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay in the role of working president. Later, under the control of Purohit, it became the "front for an agenda of creating a Hindu Rajya". While the "anger and the determination" to create a parallel government which "gives power to Hindus" can be seen in the records of the many meetings that transpired between the accused, the ATS says that it was at a meeting in Bhopal where the conspiracy for Malegaon was hatched.

Purohit was said to have convinced the group that the time had come for a parallel government - and he detailed the idea of a bomb blast.The group, according to many statements of the accused, was told about possible safe houses in Israel from where the conspirators could operate once their ideology took root and their numbers increased. According to the ATS, Pragya Singh promised "two of her men" from Gujarat. Upadhyay and Pune-based Ajay Rahirkar played key roles in logistics, conspiracy meetings and finances while Sudhakar and Sameer Kulkarni, the ATS says, were active foot soldiers of Abhinav Bharat who were paid a monthly sum of Rs 5,000 and were called 'Chanakyas'.