Assam flare-up linked to elections |
|
SUMIR KARMAKAR AND OUR BUREAU | |
Guwahati, May 3: The flare-up in
Assam that has claimed at least 30 lives so far has been linked to the
Lok Sabha polls following national and local allegations that lay the
blame at diametrically different doors.
Outside Assam,
Narendra Modi’s speeches in the state blaming Bangladeshi infiltration
have been held responsible for creating an atmosphere that fomented
trouble.
Within Assam, the
ally of the Congress-led government is under fire for an alleged ethnic
cleansing campaign aimed at re-engineering the voting population.
Jammu and Kashmir
chief minister Omar Abdullah told an election rally that “the BJP’s
prime ministerial candidate made a speech in Assam three days ago and
tried to incite people. This truth cannot be denied”.
The BJP responded by saying that “in Assam what is happening is because of the vote-bank politics of the Congress”.
Modi was not in
Assam three days ago — he was there last on April 19. But he has been
referring to Bangladeshi infiltration in his speeches in eastern India,
including in Assam and in Bengal (last Sunday). In Assam, he had gone so
far as to suggest that rhinos were being killed in Kaziranga National
Park to find room for infiltrators.
However, within
Assam itself, attention was focused on Congress ally Bodo People’s Front
(BPF), that was accused of issuing indirect threats to a community for
not voting for its candidate in the Lok Sabha polls that took place on
April 24.
Till late last night, suspicion for
the carnage had largely revolved around a militant faction opposed to
talks with the government. The outfit, the NDFB (Songbijit), today
formally denied any involvement and blamed a “third party”.
Aware of the
cross-country implications in the middle of the elections — 105 seats
are yet to vote — a clamour is growing within the Congress to snap ties
with the BPF which has had a militant past. The state Congress does not
need the 12-MLA BPF to remain in power.
Congress leaders
are openly demanding the arrest of senior BPF legislator Pramila Rani
Brahma who has been accused of making inflammatory statements on
television. AICC secretary Bhupen Kumar Borah called her “Lady Macbeth”.
Pramila said her
statement had been misinterpreted. “I said we were expecting 80 per cent
votes (from the community) but got much less. I am also pained at the
developments. I demand a CBI probe into the allegations so that the
truth is out,” she said.
The Assam
government is trying to ensure that the events of 2012, when violence
claimed 102 lives and displaced as many as four lakh people, do not
recur. Officials have been asked to convince village heads to prevent an
exodus.
Multiple versions
appeared to converge on one theme: an apprehension in the Bodo camp that
a victory in the Kokrajhar Lok Sabha seat by a non-Bodo candidate would
strike at the root of the demand for a Bodo state that has been high on
the agenda of the BPF.
Naba Kumar
Sarania, the commander of Ulfa’s 709 battalion that joined the pro-talks
faction of the outfit led by Arabinda Rajkhowa before being expelled,
is contesting against the BPF nominee and state minister, Chandan
Brahma.
“Eighty-seven per
cent of the people in the BTAD area are non-Bodos,” Jogeswar Kalita of
the Oboro Suraksha Samiti (OSS), the anti-Bodoland organisation that
supports Sarania, said. “Sarania will win and that makes the BPF
insecure.”
The All Assam
Minority Students’ Union leader, Abdur Rahim Khan, and Krishak Mukti
Sangram Samiti president Akhil Gogoi said the violence was “fully
political”. “The BPF is behind the killings; they are trying to threaten
the people to ensure that they don’t vote for anyone else in the BTC
council elections slated for 2015,” Khan said.
“The police are
blaming the NDFB(S) but villagers have told me that former Bodo
Liberation Tigers cadres had attacked them. It seems to be an
after-effect of the Lok Sabha election,” Gogoi of the KMSS said.
But the All Bodo
Students’ Union (Absu), at the forefront of the movement for a separate
state, rejected the population theory. “A majority population is not
constitutionally required for the creation of a separate state,” Pramod
Boro, the president of the Absu, said.
The civil society
is vocal that BTAD’s politics must be cleansed of militancy. “Politics
of the gun was a phenomenon in north Indian states before but now has
become an Assam phenomenon. Till it is cleansed, democracy won’t be
safe,” said Deven Dutta, the former vice-principal of Cotton College in
Guwahati.
While BPF leader
Hagrama Mohilary once led the militant Bodo Liberation Tigers, Chandan
Brahma was its vice-chairman. Hira Sarania, who was brought in to
represent the non-Bodos, was an Ulfa leader.
|
May 04, 2014
India: Assam flare-up linked to 2014 elections
The Telegraph - 4 May 2014