|

June 15, 2013

Ishrat Jahan Case - Was Modi involved ?

Name of book:
Ishrat Jahan, the girl sacrificed at the altar of a Hindutva Moloch

Mustafa Khan


[Like my other four books this book is evolving through my blog and is
meant for net free loading]


Chapter 4

Finally it is out Modi was behind the fake encounter of Ishrat Jahan

Calling IB as Intelligence Bureau of rogues and thugs and Modi playing
in their hands may not go down well with the upstarts chanting NaMo
for the post of the prime minister because he is worse than Pol Pot.
The chief minister of Gujarat was a pal of Rajendra Kuma of IB whose
brief he accepted and ordered the police to let Hindus take revenge on
Muslims in 2002 and again got Ishrat Jahan killed in fake encounter in
2004. Haren Pandya’s murder would now be laid at the door of the chief
minister. Under the ruse of democracy and ‘India First’ rather than
avowal of secularism enshrined in the constitution he ruled the state
as the enemy of the constitution. What is the difference between him
sworn to uphold the constitution of India and Lt Col Prasad Purohit
sworn to uphold the same and yet secretly planning to rescind the
constitution? Purohit’s secret alliance with the Israelis and Modi’s
subscription to Apco makes them birds of the same feather.

I have often called Modi as a real time avenger. He was in touch with
Rajendra Kumar now a special director of IB but then joint director in
2004; during the real time fake encounter on June 15 2004 he had
called and talked 40 times with Kumar. “If the job of the IB is just
to pass information which they had done a month ago, why was Kumar
constantly in touch with the Chief Minister’s office[on the day of the
fake encounter]?” What surely threatens to tighten the noose around
Modi’s neck is : “There are witnesses to prove that he[Kumar] was with
officers like DG Vanzara just few days before the encounter.” Vanzara
was the closest senior police officer of the Home Minister Modi.
Remember Kumar it was who had cajoled RB Sreekumar to accept the
conspiracy theory that the accidental fire in Sabarmati Express was
the work of ISI of Pakistan. IB’s intrusion in the administration of
Gujarat was like the tail wagging the dog.

We know physical motor action where a stimulus in the brain leads to
an action like the hand lifting or fingers picking anything. The phone
of the main public prosecutor was connected with the home department
of the state government of Gujarat. The Home Minister of Gujarat is
and was no other than the Chief Minister Narendra Modi. This was the
case in the night of June 14, 2004 when Ishrat Jahan was killed. Her
dead body with those of the others would be dumped at the fake
encounter spot several hours later when it would be morning wee hours
of June 15. As if this was not enough the phone of the main public
prosecutor Sudhir Brahmbhatt had been in direct line of communication
with the home ministry for days together. Thus this single instance of
crime against humanity emanated from the home ministry of the state of
Gujarat. The Crime Branch and the main public prosecutor were also in
league. During the pendency of the case the branch wanted the case to
be closed in unseemly hurry but the prosecution was lingering it with
the excuse that the absconders in the case who helped Ishrat Jahan
were not traceable. How could they when they were incarcerated in a
Jammu and Kashmir jail. The police officers making investigation into
the fake encounter were DySPs Narendra Amin, Tarun Barot, J G Parmar
and police inspector Bharat Patel. They did not bother to take into
custody the absconders who were very much available for prosecution in
the jail in J&K. Furthermore the four were also not arraigned as
accused. This is quid pro quo in which the consent of thehighest
police officers like Commissioner of Police Kaushik and Modi was
inevitable. Modi may be too sharp to go on record but then this give
and take in such a serious matter cannot be done without his consent.
If the arrangement was done through Amit Shah, junior minister in the
home department then Modi’s confidence in him speaks of close
connectivity of Modi in the crime.

The spy network of Shivaji helped Modi to know instantly what was
happening around. He flaunted how he could see from his chair an
octroi peon collecting toll. This watch may deter the peon but
watching Haren Pandya was the last straw on the back of the camel. He
must have been counseled by Rajendra Kumar to have Pandya liquidated.
The widow of Pandya, Jagruty had not so far openly blamed Modi and
used the means of her party BJP and its patriarch Advani to give
justice to her. However her telling that Kumar had also generated
false intelligence report that led o the killing of her husband
confirms her father in law’s strong belief that it was after all a
political murder. There can be no other rival as fatal as Modi. Modi
did not spare Ahsan Jafri so would he spare Pandya? Ishrat Jahan led
to this new angle. Shooting through the testicle of Pandya could have
been done by a sharp shooter and that was Tulsiram Prajapati. To wipe
out Tulsiram the arrangement was made at the highest level between
Amit Shah and Modi. So at long last it would be Modi who would get the
rarest of the rare punishment. This syllogism holds on the basis of
the twists of events so far.
That may not be just an individual affair of the ruler because several
officers of IB are involved and hence the agency will have a new
sobriquet of apparatus of rogues and thugs presided over by Modi. Even
then there is a catch: directly involved police officers alone will
again shield the political bosses. So the need to vet: "We have got
CDRs (call data records) of cellphones of some of the police officers
to show that they were involved in the plot until the last minute,
although they may not have been physically present at the site of the
fake encounter.” Modi was not present at the site but such an
operation could not have been undertaken without his knowledge. If he
is exempted so will have to be the Commissioner of Police Kaushik who
knew in advance that the fake encounter was to take place. GL Singhal
was to shoot Ishrat Jahan with AK 47 supplied by IB and Modi to shield
him.
-------
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/CBI-grills-prosecutor-Sudhir-Brahmbhatt-in-Ishrat-Jahan-fake-encounter-case/articleshow/20322966.cms
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/130614/news-current-affairs/article/ishrat-case-proof-against-top-ip-official-available-says-cbi

Arrest of IB special director Rajinder Kumar in the Ishrat Jahan Case imminent