Norway killer's common cause with Hindutva - excerpts from Anders Breivik’s manifesto

Source: expressindia.com

Express news service, July 27, 2011

Norway killer Anders Breivik’s manifesto for a new European order, posted online, mentions India in various contexts. Excerpts:

Common cause with Hindu nationalists

On the Indian subcontinent the history is tragic indeed, that’s where the Hindu holocaust took place in medieval times, a little-known episode in the history of Islam in the Western world, but one that left a deep traumatic mark on the people of the region and where the conflict is still present in the province of Kashmir.

All standard reference books agree that the name “Hindu Kush” of the mountain range in eastern Afghanistan means “Hindu Slaughter” or “Hindu Killer”. Most likely, the mountain range was deliberately named as “Hindu Slaughter” by Muslim conquerors, as a lesson to the future generations of Indians. However, Indians in general and Hindus in particular are completely oblivious to this tragic genocide.

If the name Hindu Kush relates such a horrible genocide of Hindus, why are Hindus ignorant about it? And why doesn’t the Government of India teach them about Hindu Kush? The history and geography curricula in Indian schools barely even mention Hindu Kush. The Indian government, instead of giving details of this “dark chapter” in Indian history, is busy in the whitewash of Muslim atrocities and the Hindu holocaust.

In 1982, the National Council of Educational Research and Training issued a directive for the rewriting of school texts. Among other things it stipulated that “characterisation of the medieval period as a time of conflict between Hindus and Moslems is forbidden”. Thus denial of history or negationism has become India’s official “educational” policy.

Hindu nationalism

Saffronisation is a political neologism (after the saffron robes of the Hindu clerics), used to refer to the policy of right-wing Hindu nationalism (or Hindutva) which seeks to make the Indian state into a “Hindu nation” and its Sikh, Buddhist and Jain minorities incorporated into Hinduism. These nationalist movements are also called Sanatana Dharma movements.

A related term, the Saffron Brigade, is used as a descriptor of people and organisations in India that promote Hindu nationalism such as the Sangh Parivar by their critics, who allege a militant Hindu agenda. The Sanatana Dharma movements or Hindu nationalists in general are suffering from the same persecution by the Indian cultural Marxists as their European cousins.

The thing is, Indian government (current government United Progressive Alliance coalition led by Indian National Congress) is (made up of) Socialist-Leftist Liberalists. The other side is National Democratic Alliance led by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), a political arm to the RSS: these people are of Hindu right-wing nationalism comprising Hindu parties (including Sikh, Buddhist, and Jain sub-sects), strongly supported by Jewish and Zoroastrian minorities.

The UPA relies on appeasing Muslims and very sadly proselytising Christian missionaries who illegally convert low-caste Hindus with lies and fear, alongside Communists who want total destruction of the Hindu faith and culture.

The irony in India is that the Hindus who are living abroad (expatriate Hindus) are more concerned about Hindu culture than the ones in India, because from abroad, they can get an eagle’s view of what’s happening in India while Indian Hindu residents don’t see it being on the scene.

The only positive thing about the Hindu right wing is that they dominate the streets. They do not tolerate the current injustice and often riot and attack Muslims when things get out of control, usually after the Muslims disrespect and degrade Hinduism too much. This behaviour is nonetheless counterproductive. Because instead of attacking the Muslims they should target the category A and B traitors in India and consolidate military cells and actively seek the overthrow of the cultural Marxist government.

India will continue to wither and die unless the Indian nationalists consolidate properly and strike to win. It is essential that the European and Indian resistance movements learn from each other and cooperate as much as possible. Our goals are more or less identical.

The PCCTS, Knights Templar support the Sanatana Dharma movements and Indian nationalists in general.

Flip side: Indians as labourers, servants

Tombstone

A future overseer organisation should provide and subsidise a standard edition of the Justiciar Knight tombstone. A European tombstone carver, preferably specialised in traditional tombstone architecture, is likely to charge more than 5,000-10,000 Euro in order to create the stone.

As such, producers in low-cost countries should be contacted for the task of creating one or multiple stones in the future. Perhaps Armenia and even China or India should be considered as well. Creating unique accessories (such as commendations, medals, tombstones etc) in India or China will allow us to save up to 80% of the estimated cost. I realise that this might sound hypocritical considering the fact that cultural conservatives in general oppose Indian or Chinese membership in WTO and the fact that we generally prefer insourcing as many industries as possible. However, conserving our funds is a central part of our struggle.

Cheap labour

It would be logical to use cheap foreign labour, especially within the construction sector. These workers should be given 12-month “focus contracts” and must return to their country of origin after the term has ended. One of the primary arguments for modern mass immigration is to justify the demand for labour, jobs the indigenous Europeans are unwilling to take. Now, who will take these jobs when we have halted immigration completely and deported all the Muslims?

Six-to-12-month “focus contracts” will be offered to individuals from Bangladesh, Pakistan and India (these services may be reserved for Christians, Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists considering our hostile stance towards the global Islamic Ummah). These will be flown in in bulk every month and will leave at the end of the contract. During their stay they will work 12 hours a day for the duration of their contracts (6 or 12 months) and will then be flown back to their homelands. There should be at least a 6-month quarantine period between every 12-month contract to prevent the individuals from becoming too culturally attached.

These individuals will live in segregated communities in pre-defined areas of each major city and must be provided free medical services, free housing in restricted barrack towns and subsidised food/essentials and subsidised transportation costs. This will allow them to return with a larger portion of their salary. They will be compensated at a rate equivalent to 300% of what they would have earned in their country of origin.

This might sound cynical to especially females (this is not slavery as slavery is taking away people’s freedom) but it is in fact much more generous than what currently Arab countries are offering their guest workers from Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and the Philippines. Furthermore, these arrangements are not very different from what the southern states in the US are currently offering Latin American guest workers.

The economical impacts of extensive usage of these “guest worker” arrangements will have significant impacts on the competitiveness of our civilisation... It will allow us to become the economical powerhouse of the world and the beacon of light for all humanity. It will allow us to contribute significantly to the furtherance of mankind.

Hip-hop youth: Pakistani friend, gangs and a broken nose

Since I was 12 years old, I was into the hip-hop movement. If you wanted girls and respect then it was all about the hip-hop community at that time. The more reckless you were, the more respect and admiration you gained.

I remember my friends at that time, Jon Trygve, Richard and Arsalan; we did everything together. In fact, it was my Muslim friend who sparked my interest for Christianity, Islam and politics in general. At the time, I couldn’t understand why he loathed Norway and my culture so much.

I remember during the first Gulf War, he used to cheer loudly whenever a scud missile was launched against the Americans. His total lack of respect for my culture (and Western culture in general) actually sparked my interest and passion for it. Thanks to him, I gradually developed a passion for my own cultural identity. This was apparently very annoying for him, as I was unwilling to convert to Islam. Instead, I suggested he convert to Christianity and embrace our norms and culture.

We used to hang out with GSV crew, or B-Gjengen as they are popularly called today, a Muslim Pakistani gang, quite violent even back then. “Gang alliances” were a part of our everyday life at that point and assured that you avoided threats and harassment. We had close ties with B-Gjengen (B-Gang) and A-Gjengen (A-Gang), both Muslim Pakistani gangs, through my best friend Arsalan who was also a Pakistani. I was one of the protected “potatoes”, having friends and allies in the Jihadi-racist gangs such as the A and B gangs and many other Muslim gangs.

One day there was an incident and my close friendship with them ended. They chose to continue the same path without me...

I’ve only experienced eight assaults, attempted robberies and multiple threats. I’ve never actually been severely ravaged, robbed or beaten by Muslims (a broken nose is the worst thing that occurred) but I know more than 20 people who have.

(At the age of) 16 years, an older and much stronger/bigger Pakistani hit me without provocation in front of Majorstuenhuset. Apparently, he wanted to subdue me in front of my “friend” Arsalan who apparently had told him to do it. This concluded, for my part, my friendship with him and I re-connected with my old friends after this incident.

People reading this might ask if I contributed in any way to the above conflicts. The answer is no... As all my friends can attest to, I wouldn’t be willing to hurt a fly and I have never used violence against others.

Role models

(The rhetorical questions are asked and answered by Breivik himself)

Name one living person you would like to meet.

The Pope or Vladimir Putin. Putin seems like a fair and resolute leader worthy of respect. I’m unsure at this point whether he has the potential to be our best friend or our worst enemy though. He’s very hard to psychoanalyse. Obviously, he has to openly condemn us at this point which is understandable.

[Russia reacts: “Breivik is the devil incarnate, absolutely mad. No matter what he wrote or said, this is the delirium of a madman” — Putin's spokesman Dmitri S Peskov, as per an NYT report quoting Kommersant newspaper]

Other people you’d want to meet?

The following people have to condemn us at this point which is fine. Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Geert Wilders, Radovan Karadzic, Lee Myung-bak and Taro Aso. But isn’t Radovan Karadzic a mass murderer and a racist?! As far as my studies show, he is neither. I condemn any atrocities committed against Croats and vice versa, but for his efforts to rid Serbia of Islam he will always be remembered as an honourable Crusader and a European war hero.

Model countries: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are today the most peaceful societies due to their monocultural model... our role models for the conservative movement. They are peaceful and anti-imperialistic just like we have aspirations to be. Our aim should be to implement a cultural conservative political model similar to (theirs), which is the same model used in Europe in the 1950s.