Deccan Chronicle, May 5, 2016
BJP assures total prohibition if voted to power, while CPI ensures the prohibition in a phased manner.
Puducherry: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Communist Party of India (CPI) promise to implement total prohibition in the Union Territory, in their election manifestos released here on Wednesday. [. . .]
read more at: http://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/politics/050516/in-pondicherry-bjp-and-cpi-promise-prohibition.html
|
Showing posts with label Pondicherry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pondicherry. Show all posts
January 28, 2016
India's education ministry ordered a probe about Islamisation of Pondicherry university following compalint by Hindutva nuts
newslaundry.com - Jan 28, 2016
When HRD ministry ordered a probe into a complaint about ‘Islamisation’ of Pondicherry University
The complaint was endorsed by Union Minister Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti.
Posted by Arunabh Saikia
| in Articles, Featured | 0 Comments
The human resource development (HRD) ministry’s zealous pursuit of the complaint against Rohith Vemula is not the only instance in recent times it has acted proactively in matters pertaining to a central university.
According to documents in Newslaundry’s possession, the ministry, in September last year (2015), asked the Pondicherry University to probe a complaint regarding “Islamisation” of the university. The complaint, filed by a Delhi-based organisation called Patriots Forum, alleges that the university had been Islamised under one of its former vice-chancellors, JAK Tareen. Tareen, incidentally, retired more than two years ago in February, 2013.
Patriots Forum’s complaint (Newslaundry has a copy of it), addressed to the HRD minister, Smriti Z Irani, states:
“The process [Islamisation] started with Dr. JAK Tareen taking over as the Vice Chancellor on March 16 in 2007 and continued in an unbroken run over 6 years till February 1, 2013. Whether in the selection of faculty or admission of students, the stamp of gradual Islamisation of the Pondicherry living was clear all through. A good number of Muslim students were from Kashmir, raising a clear suspicion that some among them could be genuine terrorists. Do not, Madam, all these make one believe that it was a planned strategy to develop a strong hold for the minority community in this part of the country? [sic]”
The complaint further accuses Tareen of attempting to build a mosque inside the university campus and introducing halal meat.
To negate the “pollution”, the complainant suggests a “suddhikaran” (purification) ceremony of the university and the town by “organisations like the Vivekananda Kendra of Kanyakumari or the Arya Samaj”.
Official records of the university confirm that it set up a three-member committee, in response to an email sent by the HRD ministry, to investigate the charges.
Pondicherry
This committee, then, submitted a report that gave a clean chit to Tareen, disproving all allegations leveled against him. The report has been accessed by Newslaundry.
On the accusation of the university being home to a disproportionately high number of Muslim teachers, the committee remarks that the university has “only 22 faculty members of the Muslim community as on date”, accounting for 5.9 per cent of the total teaching staff. “The committee felt that the percentage in no way reflects alarming trend of Islamisation,” the report states.
The report also concludes that the number of Muslim students is less than six per cent of the total student population. “From the figures…the conclusion is that the number of Muslim students is rather small compared to the overall student population,” it notes.
Additionally, refuting the complainant’s claim of a mosque being built inside the university campus, the report calls the charge “not factually correct”.
DC Nath, president of Patriots Forum – “a group of like minded Members dedicated and devoted to Preservation and Promotion of ancient Indic culture , its heritage and values [sic]” – told Newslaundry that his complaint was based on a “research paper” prepared by a “research organisation” called IndiaFacts, based in Bangalore. “We prepared a brief summary of the research done by them and forwarded it to the HRD Ministry, marking the National Security Advisor, Union Home Secretary, the Prime Minister’s Office and BJP president among others,” said Nath. Nath is a retired Indian Police Service officer and has served as the Special Director of the Intelligence Bureau.
[. . .]
The Pondicherry University’s committee report reveals that Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti, Minister of State for Food Processing Industries, also wrote to the HRD minister, endorsing the complaint. Jyoti wasn’t available for comment.
[. . .]
SEE FULL TEXT AND ORIGINAL REPORT AT: http://www.newslaundry.com/2016/01/28/when-hrd-ministry-ordered-a-probe-into-a-complaint-about-islamisation-of-pondicherry-university/
When HRD ministry ordered a probe into a complaint about ‘Islamisation’ of Pondicherry University
The complaint was endorsed by Union Minister Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti.
Posted by Arunabh Saikia
| in Articles, Featured | 0 Comments
The human resource development (HRD) ministry’s zealous pursuit of the complaint against Rohith Vemula is not the only instance in recent times it has acted proactively in matters pertaining to a central university.
According to documents in Newslaundry’s possession, the ministry, in September last year (2015), asked the Pondicherry University to probe a complaint regarding “Islamisation” of the university. The complaint, filed by a Delhi-based organisation called Patriots Forum, alleges that the university had been Islamised under one of its former vice-chancellors, JAK Tareen. Tareen, incidentally, retired more than two years ago in February, 2013.
Patriots Forum’s complaint (Newslaundry has a copy of it), addressed to the HRD minister, Smriti Z Irani, states:
“The process [Islamisation] started with Dr. JAK Tareen taking over as the Vice Chancellor on March 16 in 2007 and continued in an unbroken run over 6 years till February 1, 2013. Whether in the selection of faculty or admission of students, the stamp of gradual Islamisation of the Pondicherry living was clear all through. A good number of Muslim students were from Kashmir, raising a clear suspicion that some among them could be genuine terrorists. Do not, Madam, all these make one believe that it was a planned strategy to develop a strong hold for the minority community in this part of the country? [sic]”
The complaint further accuses Tareen of attempting to build a mosque inside the university campus and introducing halal meat.
To negate the “pollution”, the complainant suggests a “suddhikaran” (purification) ceremony of the university and the town by “organisations like the Vivekananda Kendra of Kanyakumari or the Arya Samaj”.
Official records of the university confirm that it set up a three-member committee, in response to an email sent by the HRD ministry, to investigate the charges.
Pondicherry
This committee, then, submitted a report that gave a clean chit to Tareen, disproving all allegations leveled against him. The report has been accessed by Newslaundry.
On the accusation of the university being home to a disproportionately high number of Muslim teachers, the committee remarks that the university has “only 22 faculty members of the Muslim community as on date”, accounting for 5.9 per cent of the total teaching staff. “The committee felt that the percentage in no way reflects alarming trend of Islamisation,” the report states.
The report also concludes that the number of Muslim students is less than six per cent of the total student population. “From the figures…the conclusion is that the number of Muslim students is rather small compared to the overall student population,” it notes.
Additionally, refuting the complainant’s claim of a mosque being built inside the university campus, the report calls the charge “not factually correct”.
DC Nath, president of Patriots Forum – “a group of like minded Members dedicated and devoted to Preservation and Promotion of ancient Indic culture , its heritage and values [sic]” – told Newslaundry that his complaint was based on a “research paper” prepared by a “research organisation” called IndiaFacts, based in Bangalore. “We prepared a brief summary of the research done by them and forwarded it to the HRD Ministry, marking the National Security Advisor, Union Home Secretary, the Prime Minister’s Office and BJP president among others,” said Nath. Nath is a retired Indian Police Service officer and has served as the Special Director of the Intelligence Bureau.
[. . .]
The Pondicherry University’s committee report reveals that Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti, Minister of State for Food Processing Industries, also wrote to the HRD minister, endorsing the complaint. Jyoti wasn’t available for comment.
[. . .]
SEE FULL TEXT AND ORIGINAL REPORT AT: http://www.newslaundry.com/2016/01/28/when-hrd-ministry-ordered-a-probe-into-a-complaint-about-islamisation-of-pondicherry-university/
January 06, 2013
Male Chauvinists Need Not Wait for the Return of the Taliban, They Can Meet Govt officials in Puducherry (Pondicherry) Who Want Segregation Between Sexes
The Hindu
PUDUCHERRY, January 5, 2013
Puducherry prescription: separate buses, overcoats for girls
Kavita Kishore
Separate buses for schoolboys and schoolgirls, overcoats for girls, ban on mobile phones on campuses and restricted interaction of girls and boys — these are the steps the Puducherry government has decided on to enforce to prevent harassment of girl students.
The measures came after a meeting between Education Minister T. Thiagarajan and principals in the wake of the rape of a 17-year-old student by two men on Tuesday.
By reducing contact between boys and girls, it was possible to prevent basic misbehaviour and it would also reduce “temptation,” said an Education Department official.
Instead of ‘dupatta,’ a student should wear an overcoat. Squads would be formed to check use of mobile phones by students, Secretary of Education G. Ragesh Chandra told The Hindu. These guidelines were for both private and government schools and a similar meeting with college principals would be held next week, he said.
Principals’ suggestions
During the meeting, the principals emphasised need for greater interaction of parents and teachers, advanced intimation to parents if special classes were conducted and maintenance of a record of the mobile phones of parents and guardians so that they could be informed if their wards were not present.
The move for separate buses came after several principals voiced concern that “when boys and girls travel together, they often did not get off the bus even when their stop arrived,” Mr. Chandra said.
“Many principals also observed that boys and girls sat inside the bus even before classes were over for the day, as the buses are parked on school premises. By having separate buses, these activities could be prevented.”
The measures drew flak from academicians and activists.
PUDUCHERRY, January 5, 2013
Puducherry prescription: separate buses, overcoats for girls
Kavita Kishore
Separate buses for schoolboys and schoolgirls, overcoats for girls, ban on mobile phones on campuses and restricted interaction of girls and boys — these are the steps the Puducherry government has decided on to enforce to prevent harassment of girl students.
The measures came after a meeting between Education Minister T. Thiagarajan and principals in the wake of the rape of a 17-year-old student by two men on Tuesday.
By reducing contact between boys and girls, it was possible to prevent basic misbehaviour and it would also reduce “temptation,” said an Education Department official.
Instead of ‘dupatta,’ a student should wear an overcoat. Squads would be formed to check use of mobile phones by students, Secretary of Education G. Ragesh Chandra told The Hindu. These guidelines were for both private and government schools and a similar meeting with college principals would be held next week, he said.
Principals’ suggestions
During the meeting, the principals emphasised need for greater interaction of parents and teachers, advanced intimation to parents if special classes were conducted and maintenance of a record of the mobile phones of parents and guardians so that they could be informed if their wards were not present.
The move for separate buses came after several principals voiced concern that “when boys and girls travel together, they often did not get off the bus even when their stop arrived,” Mr. Chandra said.
“Many principals also observed that boys and girls sat inside the bus even before classes were over for the day, as the buses are parked on school premises. By having separate buses, these activities could be prevented.”
The measures drew flak from academicians and activists.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
