Remove 'secular' from Constitution as it puts Hindus at disadvantage, says Sanatan Sanstha
Amid a debate over banning Sanatan
Sanstha, the radical Hindutva outfit made a demand on Monday to exclude
the word "secular" from the Preamble.
Through the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India, added in 1976, the Preamble asserts that India is a secular nation. Elaborating on the demand at a press conference, Sanatan Sanstha spokesperson Chetan Rajhans said that the Constitution does not define which aspect of India is secular: the country, government, or the people. He further added that because of the addition of the term, Hindus are "at a disadvantage"."No other country in the world puts its majority at a disadvantage," the outfit said.
Rajhans further claimed that "secular" was enacted at the time of Emergency by former prime minister Indira Gandhi, under pressure from various entities. "So, if there is a provision to add words, these can also be removed by the same provisions," he told a media conference in Mumbai.
Facing a barrage of questions, Rajhans said that the issue is "nothing new" and that the organisation has been demanding this for long through constitutional means.
Although the outfit is a non-government charitable trust, it is currently facing massive criticism for being allegedly linked to terror activities, and murder cases of rationalist thinker Narendra Dabholkar and journalist Gauri Lankesh.
Rajhans said that both Sanatan Sanstha and another outfit Hindu Janjagruti Samiti, which are facing the heat of various investigating agencies, are purely religious organisations. "We are being defamed in a pre-planned manner. We do not support or approve of violence in any form. Our mission for the past 27 years is to propagate 'dharma and spirituality," he said.
He pointed out that neither the
Anti-Terrorism Squad-CBI chargesheets nor the remand applications have
named Sanatan Sanstha in any of the murder cases. "It is only parties
like the Congress, communists, some intellectuals and thinkers and
progressive organisations who are targeting the small organisation," he
said.
"Demanding a ban on us or arresting our leader, just because the accused are arrested, is ridiculous," Rajhans said.
On 23 August, Prithviraj Chavan, who
had served as the state's chief minister from November 2010 to September
2014, said that his government had sent a proposal to ban the
organisation in 2011 and followed it up with a 1000-page dossier
detailing the activities of the radical outfit in 2012.
He said the dossier was "without any prejudice" and was based on a report prepared by the ATS on the activities of the Sanstha.
Chavan's comments came a day after Union minister of state for home affairs Hansraj Ahir said the Centre did not have "complete information" on any proposal from the Maharashtra government to ban the outfit.
With inputs from agencies
Updated Date: Aug 27, 2018 22:14 PM
Through the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India, added in 1976, the Preamble asserts that India is a secular nation. Elaborating on the demand at a press conference, Sanatan Sanstha spokesperson Chetan Rajhans said that the Constitution does not define which aspect of India is secular: the country, government, or the people. He further added that because of the addition of the term, Hindus are "at a disadvantage"."No other country in the world puts its majority at a disadvantage," the outfit said.
Rajhans further claimed that "secular" was enacted at the time of Emergency by former prime minister Indira Gandhi, under pressure from various entities. "So, if there is a provision to add words, these can also be removed by the same provisions," he told a media conference in Mumbai.
Facing a barrage of questions, Rajhans said that the issue is "nothing new" and that the organisation has been demanding this for long through constitutional means.
Although the outfit is a non-government charitable trust, it is currently facing massive criticism for being allegedly linked to terror activities, and murder cases of rationalist thinker Narendra Dabholkar and journalist Gauri Lankesh.
Rajhans said that both Sanatan Sanstha and another outfit Hindu Janjagruti Samiti, which are facing the heat of various investigating agencies, are purely religious organisations. "We are being defamed in a pre-planned manner. We do not support or approve of violence in any form. Our mission for the past 27 years is to propagate 'dharma and spirituality," he said.
"Demanding a ban on us or arresting our leader, just because the accused are arrested, is ridiculous," Rajhans said.
He said the dossier was "without any prejudice" and was based on a report prepared by the ATS on the activities of the Sanstha.
Chavan's comments came a day after Union minister of state for home affairs Hansraj Ahir said the Centre did not have "complete information" on any proposal from the Maharashtra government to ban the outfit.
With inputs from agencies
Also Watch
Kerala, After The Flood: Migrant family in Ernakulam highlights apathy it faced for being Hindi-speaking
-
Tuesday, August 7, 2018 Assam NRC: Tarun Gogoi drops a bombshell, says people in voter list could have been accommodated in citizens' register
-
Tuesday, August 21, 2018 It's a Wrap: Gold stars Akshay Kumar, Mouni Roy in conversation with Parul Sharma
-
Thursday, August 23, 2018 Manika Batra interview part 2: Table tennis star on her bid to be unpredictable, what keeps her motivated off court and more
-
Thursday, August 23, 2018 Sharath Kamal Interview part 2: Veteran paddler on journey since career threatening injury, motivation to carry on and more
Also See
-
Umar Khalid issues statement a day after attack in Delhi, says 'they can't scare us into silence'
-
Investigators trace links between murders of Narendra Dabholkar, Gauri Lankesh, MM Kalburgi, Govind Pansare
-
Narendra Dabholkar murder: Activists hold protests in Pune, slam Maharashtra govt for slow pace of investigation