|

March 04, 2016

India: Mahishasur in the 'Temple' of Democracy (Neshat Quaiser)

[Forwarded email message]

March 2, 2016 10:49 PM, Jamia_Millia_Alumni_directory <jamia.millia.alumni@gmail.com> wrote:


26-02-2016

MHISHASUR IN THE ‘TEMPLE’ OF DEMOCRACY

Neshat Quaiser

Mahshasur figured in the Temple of Democracy, the Indian Parliament. No, he was not installed in the Temple of Democracy. Multiplicity, diversity, tolerance are some of the constitutive elements of democracy. But Mahishasur, worshiped by many, cannot find a place in the temple of democracy according to ruling party. His annihilation was not mourned but eulogized in a sense. No wonder a brahmin priest on a private t.v channel declared that Mahisasur was a rakshasa and that is why he was killed by mother Durga.

Whether, the Parliament should be characterized as the ‘Temple’ of Democracy, or a university should be called as ‘Temple’ of Learning, is a serious ideological and theoretical question, that I am not going into at the moment, but it deserves serious academic consideration.

In March 2015 I wrote to a student: Mahishasur–Durga story has an alternative interpretation by some people – you would perhaps like to keep this also in mind – ultimately it is you who will decide – but whatever you stand for should be after due critical examination of history. And of course everybody has the right to uphold any idea that one professes.
Any way I am not competent enough to say anything authoritatively on the issue at the moment, but I thought I should bring to your notice certain facts, in case you are not aware of.

The reinterpretation Mahishasur–Durga story goes as follows:

Mahishasur - mahish+asur - mahish means buffalo and Asur means demon, so mahishasur means Buffalo Demon. In other words, demons are not God i.e Sur. In Hindu pantheon God stands for Brahmins, the high castes, that is touchable castes who in this context do not involve themselves in manual labour. While, Asur are those who are manual labourers. Mahisasur may have been the one who reared baffalows – so, not Aryans.

It is argued by these re-interpreters that the Durga killing Mahisasur in fact is the celebration of the genocide of native people by the Aryan invaders. Dalit research scholars have strongly argued that Mahisasur was actually a Dalit king killed by Aryans and they strongly object his being portrayed as demon Mahishasur.

Durga story, thus has an alternative interpretation by some people – you would perhaps like to keep this also in mind – ultimately it is you who will decide – but whatever you stand for should be after due critical examination of history. More importantly, methodology of not disregarding multiple understanding and interpretations of a phenomenon is must for any student of sociology.

There are tribal groups in Jharkand area who celebrate Mahishasur. A FB friend wrote that in certain parts of South India we adore Mahishasura. In fact city of Mysore is named after him (shortened from Mahishasurana ooru). If worshipping Mahishasura is seditious, the whole city of Mysore is anti-national. Moreover, the temple of the city’s guardian deity—Chamundi—has a giant statue of Mahishasura.
In certain parts of Bundelkhand, Mahishasur is even now revered.

Prof Neshat Quaiser
Department of Sociology
--
While posting a message please include the Subject heading and your full name, highest degree from Jamia Millia, year of graduation, and present location. Jamia Millia Alumni directory messages may be forwarded to other newsgroups and e-mailed to others, provided that they are not edited, author name, and URL https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/jamia_millia_alumni_directory included.