ISIS, Oil Politics and
Peaking of Islamophobia
Ram Puniyani
Just a month ago (August 2014) a group of Muslim
activists-scholars organized press meets in various cities. They issued a statement
condemning the brutal violence being committed by ISIS. There statement carried
a visual saying Islam Means Peace. The statement said “Indian Muslims Condemn the Brutal Atrocities by
ISIS against Minorities in Iraq and Syria; denounce religious intolerance,
persecution and violence in the name of Islam” I circulated the statement to many lists. One of the members on
the list wrote back that “‘Islam means Peace’ is the biggest joke of the
century”. Simultaneously in India, the propaganda about love Jihad is being
spread like wild fire by communal elements. Irrespective of the fact that in
such a propaganda few cases of marriage-conversion, the girls changing their
version the boundary line between love and imposition being regularly breached,
have been picked up as an example of Muslim men on a path to Jihad for
conversion to Islam, by marrying Hindu girls by deceit. A friend demanded
whether I can cite even 100 cases where Muslim girls have married Hindu men. To
my good fortune I could locate a list longer than that of 100 and also a Google
search of Hindu Men Muslim wife gave good many beautiful stories (https://www.facebook.com/
The ‘social common sense’ is so heavily weighted against Islam
and Muslims that to talk of reason in understanding religion and its abuse for
political goals seems to be a very difficult exercise. The current ghastly acts
are being described to be due to Islam and in turn Muslim community is blamed
for the violence. The understanding that religions are for ‘morality and peace’
is accepted for other religions but not for Islam in popular perception. Many a
processes of ‘Manufacturing Consent’ are today fusing to create a picture of
Muslims which is neither true nor of any good to the peace in the World. All
Muslims are being presented in homogenous-uniform image and the selective
examples of the criminal Muslims and intolerant version of Islam is being
projected as ‘the Islam’ feeding into the massive prejudices which have
intensified during last several decades.
While the ISIS is an offshoot of AL Qaeda, which was trained by
USA-ISI through Madrasa’s set up in Pakistan. There are enough good resources
to tell us about the scheme of US in the West Asia to control the oil wealth.
The US dictum for this area has been ‘Oil is too precious a commodity to be left
to control of natives’. While one has burnt midnight oil to unravel the
trajectory of US policy through books with solid scholarship, the job of
understanding this has become easy with a small video clip of Hillary Clinton.
Very smartly and briskly she tells us that it was US which created Al Qaeda by
indoctrinating the Muslim youth. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?
This force, Al Qaeda was created, richly funded and armed to the
teeth by US, to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. With the brutality
of Al Qaeda being manifest, US media presented its demonic image by coining the
word ‘Islamic terrorism’ after 9/11 2001. Before this 9/11 episode, the acts of
terror were not linked to religion, though people coming from different religions
have resorted to such acts. From killer of Mahatama Gandhi, Indira Gandhi,
Rajiv Gandhi, to Buddhist monks resorting to terror acts in Thailand, Mynmar,
Sri Lanka to Anders Berling Brevik of Norway, people coming from different
religious stocks have indulged in acts of terror for diverse political reasons.
After 9/11 the acts of terror was associated exclusively with Islam.
Interestingly the version of Islam picked up by US to create Al
Qaeda, to indoctrinate Mujahideen in to terror trails, was formulated by Abd
al-Wahhab, who had started rigidifying Islam; imposing his exclusive version in
the projection of Islam. He pontificates that "any doubt or
hesitation" on the part of a believer in respect to his or her
acknowledging this (Wahab’s) particular interpretation of Islam should "deprive a man of immunity of his property and
his life." This was the version of Islam which
was one amongst many. Why did it become more dominant? Mostly because this version got the sanction
form the political masters as this version got patronage
of the rulers of Saudi Arabia. “One of the main tenets of Abd al-Wahhab's
doctrine is takfir. As per this doctrine fellow Muslims are called infidels
if they engage in activities that in any way could be said to encroach on the
sovereignty of the absolute Authority (that is, the King)." Those who would not
conform to this view should be killed, their wives and daughters violated, and
their possessions confiscated, he wrote.” (http://www.huffingtonpost.
This version suited the
Saudi rulers in keeping their control over oil resources and the same version
suited the US designs, where the meaning of Kafir (One who hides the truth) is
changed to the non Muslim, the ‘other’. This is the version where the word
Jihad is made synonymous with killing the non believer. As such scholars of
repute tell us that Jihad stands for striving to your utmost for good deeds.
The same Islam, which says ‘to me my din
(faith) to you yours’ is changed over to killing those who disagree with you. The
same Islam which tells us that ‘killing of even a single innocent human being tantamount
to killing the whole humanity’ (Koran, chapter 5 verse 32) was manipulated to
kill innocent human beings. This interpretation of Islam was the perfect recipe
for those who wanted to fight Russian army through proxy! The indoctrination of
this variety cannot be undone once the goals are achieved. The Al Qaeda elements
after collaborating in defeating Russian army; retain the distorted version of
Islam and the dangerous weapons supplied by US. What do they do now with Wahabi
Islam in head and armaments received courtesy the United States, in hands? So ISIS
comes up in due course, and the illusion that they can now rule the World, they
will install Khalifa, and all the insanity follows!
As such US has been out
to play ‘divide and rule’ like the earlier colonial powers. In India colonial
powers sowed the seeds of communal politics. In West Asia, during last few
decades after the demise of Soviet Union; US imperialism is aiming to create
smaller states along ethnic-sectarian divides and feeding into the divides and
clashes along Shia-Sunni-Kurd lines. ‘Divide-et-empera’ (divide and rule) is at
its peak but is also at the same time demonizing the Muslims Worldwide through
the Islam phobia which is constructed around the evil deeds of the likes of Al
Qaeda or ISIS.
How can we bring in reason
in ‘social thinking’ in the face of powerful vested interests who want to use
and abuse religion for their political goals, demonize a religious community is
a question not easy to resolve. Challenging the prevalence of ideas of the
dominant sections, dominant social powers; is a tall order, which has to be
taken up in all seriousness if we want peace and progress in our society.
